Literature DB >> 19651059

Risk tolerance and bile duct injury: surgeon characteristics, risk-taking preference, and common bile duct injuries.

Nader N Massarweh1, Allison Devlin, Rebecca Gaston Symons, Jo Ann Broeckel Elrod, David R Flum.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about surgeon characteristics associated with common bile duct injury (CBDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Risk-taking preferences can influence physician behavior and practice. We evaluated self-reported differences in characteristics and risk-taking preference among surgeons with and without a reported history of CBDI. STUDY
DESIGN: A mailed survey was sent to 4,100 general surgeons randomly selected from the mailing list of the American College of Surgeons. Surveys with a valid exclusion (retired, no LC experience) were considered responsive, but were excluded from data analysis.
RESULTS: Forty-four percent responded (1,412 surveys analyzed), 37.7% reported being the primary surgeon when a CBDI occurred, and 12.9% had more than one injury. Surgeons reporting an injury were slightly older (52.8 +/- 9.0 years versus 51.3 +/- 9.8 years; p < 0.004) and in practice longer (20.8 +/- 9.7 years versus 18.9 +/- 10.5 years; p < 0.001). Surgeons not reporting a CBDI were more likely trained in LC during residency (63.3% versus 55.4% injuring) as compared with surgeons reporting a CBDI, who were more likely trained at an LC course (29.8% versus 38.2%). Surgeons in academic practice or who work with residents had lower reported rates of CBDI (7.9% versus 14.5% [academics]; 18.7% versus 25.0% [residents]). Mean risk score was 12.4 +/- 4.4 (range 6 to 30 [30 = highest]) with a similar average between those who did (12.2 +/- 4.5) and did not (11.9 +/- 4.4) report a CBDI (p < 0.23). Compared with surgeons in the lowest three deciles of risk score, relative risk for CBDI among surgeons in the upper three deciles was 17% greater (p = 0.07).
CONCLUSIONS: More years performing LC and certain practice characteristics were associated with an increased rate of CBDI. The impact of extremes of risk-taking preference on surgical decision making can be an important part of decreasing adverse events during LC and should be evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19651059     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.02.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  11 in total

1.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS™) versus standard laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of performance using a surgical simulator.

Authors:  Byron F Santos; Daniel Enter; Nathaniel J Soper; Eric S Hungness
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Variation in the use of intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kristin M Sheffield; Yimei Han; Yong-Fang Kuo; Courtney M Townsend; James S Goodwin; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 3.  Quality of Life and Medico-Legal Implications Following Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injuries.

Authors:  Deepak Hariharan; Emmanouil Psaltis; John H Scholefield; Dileep N Lobo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Comparing early and delayed repair of common bile duct injury to identify clinical drivers of outcome and morbidity.

Authors:  Russell C Kirks; T E Barnes; Patrick D Lorimer; Allyson Cochran; Imran Siddiqui; John B Martinie; Erin H Baker; David A Iannitti; Dionisios Vrochides
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in hospitals with and without surgical residency programs: is there a difference?

Authors:  Vincent L Harrison; James P Dolan; Thai H Pham; Brian S Diggs; Alexander J Greenstein; Brett C Sheppard; John G Hunter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Transition from a low: to a high-volume centre for bile duct repair: changes in technique and improved outcome.

Authors:  Miguel Ángel Mercado; Bernardo Franssen; Ismael Dominguez; Juan Carlos Arriola-Cabrera; Fernando Ramírez-Del Val; Alejandro Elnecavé-Olaiz; Rigoberto Arámburo-García; Artemio García
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Management of Bile Duct Injuries: A 6-year Experience in a High Volume Referral Center.

Authors:  Simay Dal Çavuşoğlu; Mutlu Doğanay; Birkan Birben; Gökhan Akkurt; Özgur Akgul; Mehmet Keşkek
Journal:  Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol       Date:  2020 Jan-Jun

8.  Visibility enhancement of common bile duct for laparoscopic cholecystectomy by vivid fiber-optic indication: a porcine experiment trial.

Authors:  Hsing-Ying Lin; Chen-Han Huang; Shannon Shy; Yu-Chung Chang; Hsiang-Chen Chui; Tsung-Chih Yu; Chih-Han Chang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Biliary complications postlaparoscopic cholecystectomy: mechanism, preventive measures, and approach to management: a review.

Authors:  Norman Oneil Machado
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2011-06-12

Review 10.  Difficult iatrogenic bile duct injuries following different types of upper abdominal surgery: report of three cases and review of literature.

Authors:  Jerzy Lubikowski; Bernard Piotuch; Anna Stadnik; Marta Przedniczek; Piotr Remiszewski; Piotr Milkiewicz; Michael A Silva; Maciej Wojcicki
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.