Russell C Kirks1, T E Barnes1, Patrick D Lorimer2, Allyson Cochran1, Imran Siddiqui1, John B Martinie1, Erin H Baker1, David A Iannitti1, Dionisios Vrochides3. 1. Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA. 2. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA. 3. Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA. Electronic address: Dionisios.Vrochides@carolinashealthcare.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Outcomes following repair of common bile duct injury (CBDI) are influenced by center and surgeon experience. Determinants of morbidity related to timing of repair are not fully described in this population. METHODS: Patients with CBDI managed surgically at a single center from January 2008 to June 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes of patients undergoing early (≤48 h from injury) and delayed (>48 h) repair were compared. Predictive modeling for readmission was performed for patients undergoing delayed repair. RESULTS: In total, 61 patients underwent surgical biliary reconstruction. Between the early and delayed repair groups, no differences were found in patient demographics, injury classification subtype, vasculobiliary injury (VBI) incidence, hospital length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, or 90-day mortality rate. Patients undergoing delayed repair exhibited increased chance of readmission if VBI was present or if multiple endoscopic procedures were performed prior to repair. A predictive model was constructed with these variables (ROC 0.681). CONCLUSION: When managed by a tertiary hepatopancreatobiliary center, equivalent outcomes can be realized for patients undergoing early and delayed repair of CBDI. Establishment of evidence-based consensus guidelines for evaluation and treatment of CBDI may allow identification of factors that drive morbidity and predict clinical outcomes in this population.
BACKGROUND: Outcomes following repair of common bile duct injury (CBDI) are influenced by center and surgeon experience. Determinants of morbidity related to timing of repair are not fully described in this population. METHODS:Patients with CBDI managed surgically at a single center from January 2008 to June 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes of patients undergoing early (≤48 h from injury) and delayed (>48 h) repair were compared. Predictive modeling for readmission was performed for patients undergoing delayed repair. RESULTS: In total, 61 patients underwent surgical biliary reconstruction. Between the early and delayed repair groups, no differences were found in patient demographics, injury classification subtype, vasculobiliary injury (VBI) incidence, hospital length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, or 90-day mortality rate. Patients undergoing delayed repair exhibited increased chance of readmission if VBI was present or if multiple endoscopic procedures were performed prior to repair. A predictive model was constructed with these variables (ROC 0.681). CONCLUSION: When managed by a tertiary hepatopancreatobiliary center, equivalent outcomes can be realized for patients undergoing early and delayed repair of CBDI. Establishment of evidence-based consensus guidelines for evaluation and treatment of CBDI may allow identification of factors that drive morbidity and predict clinical outcomes in this population.
Authors: Nader N Massarweh; Allison Devlin; Rebecca Gaston Symons; Jo Ann Broeckel Elrod; David R Flum Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2009-05-01 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Kristoffer Lassen; Marielle M E Coolsen; Karem Slim; Francesco Carli; José E de Aguilar-Nascimento; Markus Schäfer; Rowan W Parks; Kenneth C H Fearon; Dileep N Lobo; Nicolas Demartines; Marco Braga; Olle Ljungqvist; Cornelis H C Dejong Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2012-09-26 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Kristoffer Lassen; Marielle M E Coolsen; Karem Slim; Francesco Carli; José E de Aguilar-Nascimento; Markus Schäfer; Rowan W Parks; Kenneth C H Fearon; Dileep N Lobo; Nicolas Demartines; Marco Braga; Olle Ljungqvist; Cornelis H C Dejong Journal: World J Surg Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: U O Gustafsson; M J Scott; W Schwenk; N Demartines; D Roulin; N Francis; C E McNaught; J Macfie; A S Liberman; M Soop; A Hill; R H Kennedy; D N Lobo; K Fearon; O Ljungqvist Journal: World J Surg Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Christopher J Goodenough; Tien C Ko; Lillian S Kao; Mylan T Nguyen; Julie L Holihan; Zeinab Alawadi; Duyen H Nguyen; Juan R Flores; Nestor T Arita; J Scott Roth; Mike K Liang Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2015-01-02 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Vicente Valero; Joshua C Grimm; Arman Kilic; Russell L Lewis; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Jin He; James F Griffin; John L Cameron; Matthew J Weiss; Charles M Vollmer; Christopher L Wolfgang Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2015-01-08 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Eduardo de Santibañes; Victoria Ardiles; Adrian Gadano; Martin Palavecino; Juan Pekolj; Miguel Ciardullo Journal: World J Surg Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Juan Pekolj; Fernando A Alvarez; Martin Palavecino; Rodrigo Sánchez Clariá; Oscar Mazza; Eduardo de Santibañes Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2013-03-18 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Anne Marthe Schreuder; Olivier R Busch; Marc G Besselink; Povilas Ignatavicius; Antanas Gulbinas; Giedrius Barauskas; Dirk J Gouma; Thomas M van Gulik Journal: Dig Surg Date: 2019-01-17 Impact factor: 2.588
Authors: Jerzy Lubikowski; Bernard Piotuch; Anna Stadnik; Marta Przedniczek; Piotr Remiszewski; Piotr Milkiewicz; Michael A Silva; Maciej Wojcicki Journal: BMC Surg Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Włodzimierz Otto; Janusz Sierdziński; Justyna Smaga; Oskar Kornasiewicz; Krzysztof Dudek; Krzysztof Zieniewicz Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 4.964