Literature DB >> 11919289

Inferring the history of speciation from multilocus DNA sequence data: the case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives.

Carlos A Machado1, Richard M Kliman, Jeffrey A Markert, Jody Hey.   

Abstract

The divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura from its close relatives, D. persimilis and D. pseudoobscura bogotana, was examined using the pattern of DNA sequence variation in a common set of 50 inbred lines at 11 loci from diverse locations in the genome. Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis show a marked excess of low-frequency variation across loci, consistent with a model of recent population expansion in both species. The different loci vary considerably, both in polymorphism levels and in the levels of polymorphisms that are shared by different species pairs. A major question we address is whether these patterns of shared variation are best explained by gene flow or by persistence since common ancestry. A new test of gene flow, based on patterns of linkage disequilibrium, is developed. The results from these, and other tests, support a model in which D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis have exchanged genes at some loci. However, the pattern of variation suggests that most gene flow, although occurring after speciation began, was not recent. There is less evidence of gene flow between D. pseudoobscura and D. p. bogotana. The results are compared with recent work on the genomic locations of genes that contribute to reproductive isolation between D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. We show that there is a good correspondence between the genomic regions associated with reproductive isolation and the regions that show little or no evidence of gene flow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11919289     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  131 in total

1.  Nuclear gene genealogies reveal historical, demographic and selective factors associated with speciation in field crickets.

Authors:  Richard E Broughton; Richard G Harrison
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The causes of phylogenetic conflict in a classic Drosophila species group.

Authors:  Carlos A Machado; Jody Hey
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Testing the chromosomal speciation hypothesis for humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Jianzhi Zhang; Xiaoxia Wang; Ondrej Podlaha
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Multilocus methods for estimating population sizes, migration rates and divergence time, with applications to the divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.

Authors:  Jody Hey; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Patterns of selection on synonymous and nonsynonymous variants in Drosophila miranda.

Authors:  Carolina Bartolomé; Xulio Maside; Soojin Yi; Anna L Grant; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Geographic selection in the small heat shock gene complex differentiating populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Allie M Graham; Jennifer D Merrill; Suzanne E McGaugh; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 2.645

Review 7.  Recombination rate variation and speciation: theoretical predictions and empirical results from rabbits and mice.

Authors:  Michael W Nachman; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Quantifying the variation in the effective population size within a genome.

Authors:  Toni I Gossmann; Megan Woolfit; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Contrasting patterns of introgression at X-linked loci across the hybrid zone between subspecies of the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus).

Authors:  Armando Geraldes; Nuno Ferrand; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-02       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.