Literature DB >> 19646825

Accurate prediction of pathological rectal tumor response after two weeks of preoperative radiochemotherapy using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging.

Marco H M Janssen1, Michel C Ollers, Robert G Riedl, Jørgen van den Bogaard, Jeroen Buijsen, Ruud G P M van Stiphout, Hugo J W L Aerts, Philippe Lambin, Guido Lammering.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the optimal time point for repeated (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (PET)-CT imaging during preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) and the best predictive factor for the prediction of pathological treatment response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 30 patients referred for preoperative RCT treatment were included in this prospective study. All patients underwent sequential PET-CT imaging at four time points: prior to therapy, at day 8 and 15 during RCT, and shortly before surgery. Tumor metabolic treatment responses were correlated with the pathological responses by evaluation of the tumor regression grade (TRG) and the pathological TN (ypT) stage of the resected specimen.
RESULTS: Based on their TRG evaluations, 13 patients were classified as pathological responders, whereas 17 patients were classified as pathological nonresponders. The response index (RI) for the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) on day 15 of RCT was found to be the best predictive factor for the pathological response (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.87) compared to the RI on day 8 (AUC = 0.78) or the RI of presurgical PET imaging (AUC = 0.66). A cutoff value of 43% for the reduction of SUV(max) resulted in a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 93%.
CONCLUSIONS: The SUV(max)-based RI calculated after the first 2 weeks of RCT provided the best predictor of pathological treatment response, reaching AUCs of 0.87 and 0.84 for the TRG and the ypT stage, respectively. However, a few patients presented with peritumoral inflammatory reactions, which led to mispredictions. Exclusion of these patients further enhanced the predictive accuracy of PET imaging to AUCs of 0.97 and 0.89 for TRG and ypT, respectively. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19646825     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  30 in total

1.  Tumor status at 12 weeks predicts survival in advanced colorectal cancer: findings from NCCTG N9741.

Authors:  James M Heun; Axel Grothey; Megan E Branda; Richard M Goldberg; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-05-31

2.  Positron emission tomography as predictor of rectal cancer response during or following neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Authors:  Shane Hopkins; Marwan Fakih; Gary Y Yang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2010-05-15

Review 3.  Computerized PET/CT image analysis in the evaluation of tumour response to therapy.

Authors:  W Lu; J Wang; H H Zhang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Adaptive radiation dose escalation in rectal adenocarcinoma: a review.

Authors:  Jonathan D Van Wickle; Eric S Paulson; Jerome C Landry; Beth A Erickson; William A Hall
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-10

5.  ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT-based treatment response evaluation in locally advanced rectal cancer: a prospective validation of long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Felipe A Calvo; Claudio V Sole; Dolores de la Mata; Luis Cabezón; Marina Gómez-Espí; Emilio Alvarez; Paz Madariaga; José L Carreras
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Early FDG PET response assessment of preoperative radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: correlation with long-term outcome.

Authors:  Antonio Avallone; Luigi Aloj; Corradina Caracò; Paolo Delrio; Biagio Pecori; Fabiana Tatangelo; Nigel Scott; Rossana Casaretti; Francesca Di Gennaro; Massimo Montano; Lucrezia Silvestro; Alfredo Budillon; Secondo Lastoria
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Letter to the editor re: positron emission tomography with [(18)F]-3'-deoxy-3'fluorothymidine (FLT) as a predictor of outcome in patients with locally advanced resectable rectal cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  A Chalkidou; G Mikhaeel; M J O'Doherty; P K Marsden
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Combined value of apparent diffusion coefficient-standardized uptake value max in evaluation of post-treated locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Davide Ippolito; Davide Fior; Chiara Trattenero; Elena De Ponti; Silvia Drago; Luca Guerra; Cammillo Talei Franzesi; Sandro Sironi
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-28

9.  Tumor SUVmax Normalized to Liver Uptake on (18)F-FDG PET/CT Predicts the Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jihyun Park; Kyoung Jin Chang; Young Seok Seo; Byung Hyun Byun; Joon Ho Choi; Hansol Moon; Ilhan Lim; Byung Il Kim; Chang Woon Choi; Sang Moo Lim
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-08-01

10.  The predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for assessing pathological response and survival in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy.

Authors:  Lucia Leccisotti; Maria Antonietta Gambacorta; Chiara de Waure; Antonella Stefanelli; Brunella Barbaro; Fabio Maria Vecchio; Claudio Coco; Roberto Persiani; Antonio Crucitti; Antonino Pio Tortorelli; Alessandro Giordano; Vincenzo Valentini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.