Literature DB >> 21160619

Positron emission tomography as predictor of rectal cancer response during or following neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Shane Hopkins1, Marwan Fakih, Gary Y Yang.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) shows great promise as a tool to evaluate the effectiveness of rectal cancer neoadjuvant therapy as it has demonstrated high predictive value in several studies. Creating a standardized method of using PET has the potential to reduce ineffective treatments. However, relevant studies have been heterogenous in approach, making any unified standard difficult to establish. PET related parameters used to assess treatment response include magnitude and change of standard uptake value, total lesion glycolysis, and visual response. Finding the best evaluation interval and parameters to use for interpreting PET results in the neo-adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer needs additional study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neoadjuvant therapy; Positron emission tomography; Rectal cancer

Year:  2010        PMID: 21160619      PMCID: PMC2998836          DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v2.i5.213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol


  27 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Attenuation correction of PET images with respiration-averaged CT images in PET/CT.

Authors:  Tinsu Pan; Osama Mawlawi; Sadek A Nehmeh; Yusuf E Erdi; Dershan Luo; Hui H Liu; Richard Castillo; Radhe Mohan; Zhongxing Liao; H A Macapinlac
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Can molecular imaging predict response to preoperative chemoradiation in patients with rectal cancer? A Fox Chase Cancer Center prospective experience.

Authors:  Andre Konski; John Hoffman; Elin Sigurdson; Oleh Haluszka; Paul Engstrom; Jonathan D Cheng; Steven J Cohen; James C Watson; Debra Eisenberg; Eileen McGarrity; Gary Freedman; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  The predictive value of metabolic response to preoperative radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer measured by PET/CT.

Authors:  Robert Rosenberg; Ken Herrmann; Ralf Gertler; Beat Künzli; Markus Essler; Florian Lordick; Karen Becker; Tibor Schuster; Hans Geinitz; Matthias Maak; Markus Schwaiger; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert; Bernd Krause
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  18F-FDG positron emission tomography staging and restaging in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation.

Authors:  Felipe A Calvo; Marta Domper; Raúl Matute; Raúl Martínez-Lázaro; José A Arranz; Manuel Desco; Emilio Alvarez; José Luis Carreras
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Cancer statistics, 2009.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Can an FDG-PET/CT predict tumor clearance of the mesorectal fascia after preoperative chemoradiation of locally advanced rectal cancer?

Authors:  Roy F A Vliegen; Regina G Beets-Tan; Bart Vanhauten; Ann Driessen; Michel Oellers; Alfons G Kessels; Ann Arens; Geerard L Beets; Jeroen Buijsen; Angela van Baardwijk; Dirk de Ruysscher; Guido Lammering
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Sequential preoperative fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography assessment of response to preoperative chemoradiation: a means for determining longterm outcomes of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jose G Guillem; Harvey G Moore; Timothy Akhurst; David S Klimstra; Leyo Ruo; Madhu Mazumdar; Bruce D Minsky; Leonard Saltz; W Douglas Wong; Steven Larson
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Sequential FDG-PET/CT reliably predicts response of locally advanced rectal cancer to neo-adjuvant chemo-radiation therapy.

Authors:  Carlo Capirci; Lucia Rampin; Paola A Erba; Fabrizio Galeotti; Giorgio Crepaldi; Elena Banti; Marcello Gava; Stefano Fanti; Giuliano Mariani; Pier Carlo Muzzio; Domenico Rubello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Use of molecular imaging to predict clinical outcome in patients with rectal cancer after preoperative chemotherapy and radiation.

Authors:  Andre Konski; Tianyu Li; Elin Sigurdson; Steven J Cohen; William Small; Stewart Spies; Jian Q Yu; Andrew Wahl; Steven Stryker; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  2 in total

1.  Role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in predicting the pathologic response to preoperative chemoradiation therapy in patients with resectable T3 pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Hirotada Kittaka; Hidenori Takahashi; Hiroaki Ohigashi; Kunihito Gotoh; Terumasa Yamada; Yasuhiko Tomita; Yoshihisa Hasegawa; Masahiko Yano; Osamu Ishikawa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Difference between carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in evaluating the treatment efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Results of a dual-center study.

Authors:  Hirofumi Akita; Hidenori Takahashi; Hidetoshi Eguchi; Kei Asukai; Shinichiro Hasegawa; Hiroshi Wada; Yoshifumi Iwagami; Daisaku Yamada; Yoshito Tomimaru; Takehiro Noda; Kunihito Gotoh; Shogo Kobayashi; Yuichiro Doki; Masato Sakon
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2020-12-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.