Literature DB >> 19646450

Sampling bottlenecks in de novo protein structure prediction.

David E Kim1, Ben Blum, Philip Bradley, David Baker.   

Abstract

The primary obstacle to de novo protein structure prediction is conformational sampling: the native state generally has lower free energy than nonnative structures but is exceedingly difficult to locate. Structure predictions with atomic level accuracy have been made for small proteins using the Rosetta structure prediction method, but for larger and more complex proteins, the native state is virtually never sampled, and it has been unclear how much of an increase in computing power would be required to successfully predict the structures of such proteins. In this paper, we develop an approach to determining how much computer power is required to accurately predict the structure of a protein, based on a reformulation of the conformational search problem as a combinatorial sampling problem in a discrete feature space. We find that conformational sampling for many proteins is limited by critical "linchpin" features, often the backbone torsion angles of individual residues, which are sampled very rarely in unbiased trajectories and, when constrained, dramatically increase the sampling of the native state. These critical features frequently occur in less regular and likely strained regions of proteins that contribute to protein function. In a number of proteins, the linchpin features are in regions found experimentally to form late in folding, suggesting a correspondence between folding in silico and in reality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19646450      PMCID: PMC2760740          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.07.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  27 in total

1.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices.

Authors:  D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Towards understanding a molecular switch mechanism: thermodynamic and crystallographic studies of the signal transduction protein CheY.

Authors:  M Solà; E López-Hernández; P Cronet; E Lacroix; L Serrano; M Coll; A Párraga
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-10-20       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Cyclic coordinate descent: A robotics algorithm for protein loop closure.

Authors:  Adrian A Canutescu; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 4.  Progress in modeling of protein structures and interactions.

Authors:  Ora Schueler-Furman; Chu Wang; Phil Bradley; Kira Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Ubiquitin folds through a highly polarized transition state.

Authors:  Heather M Went; Sophie E Jackson
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 1.650

6.  Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins.

Authors:  Philip Bradley; Kira M S Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The structure of an energy-coupling protein from bacteria, IIBcellobiose, reveals similarity to eukaryotic protein tyrosine phosphatases.

Authors:  R L van Montfort; T Pijning; K H Kalk; J Reizer; M H Saier; M M Thunnissen; G T Robillard; B W Dijkstra
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Crystal structure of the DNA-binding domain of Mbp1, a transcription factor important in cell-cycle control of DNA synthesis.

Authors:  R M Xu; C Koch; Y Liu; J R Horton; D Knapp; K Nasmyth; X Cheng
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features.

Authors:  W Kabsch; C Sander
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.505

10.  De novo protein structure generation from incomplete chemical shift assignments.

Authors:  Yang Shen; Robert Vernon; David Baker; Ad Bax
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 2.835

View more
  34 in total

1.  An enumerative stepwise ansatz enables atomic-accuracy RNA loop modeling.

Authors:  Parin Sripakdeevong; Wipapat Kladwang; Rhiju Das
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  From laptop to benchtop to bedside: structure-based drug design on protein targets.

Authors:  Lu Chen; John K Morrow; Hoang T Tran; Sharangdhar S Phatak; Lei Du-Cuny; Shuxing Zhang
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.116

3.  Improved chemical shift based fragment selection for CS-Rosetta using Rosetta3 fragment picker.

Authors:  Robert Vernon; Yang Shen; David Baker; Oliver F Lange
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Time-averaged order parameter restraints in molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Niels Hansen; Fabian Heller; Nathan Schmid; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 5.  Principles and Overview of Sampling Methods for Modeling Macromolecular Structure and Dynamics.

Authors:  Tatiana Maximova; Ryan Moffatt; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov; Amarda Shehu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 6.  The Last Secret of Protein Folding: The Real Relationship Between Long-Range Interactions and Local Structures.

Authors:  Aoneng Cao
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 2.371

7.  Oxidative Damage? Not a Problem! The Characterization of Humanin-like Mitochondrial Peptide in Anoxia Tolerant Freshwater Turtles.

Authors:  Sanoji Wijenayake; Kenneth B Storey
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.371

Review 8.  Chemical shift-based methods in NMR structure determination.

Authors:  Santrupti Nerli; Andrew C McShan; Nikolaos G Sgourakis
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2018-03-11       Impact factor: 9.795

9.  CASP10 results compared to those of previous CASP experiments.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Krzysztof Fidelis; John Moult
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-12-17

10.  Protein Structure Refinement through Structure Selection and Averaging from Molecular Dynamics Ensembles.

Authors:  Vahid Mirjalili; Michael Feig
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.