Literature DB >> 25070247

Corneal back surface radius after DSEK and DSAEK: a comparative single surgeon case control study.

Jan D Unterlauft1, Katharina Elsässer, Wolfgang Haigis, Gerd Geerling.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyse and compare the visual and refractive results after DSEK with manual donor dissection and DSAEK with microkeratome-assisted donor dissection in a retrospective unmasked case control study. DSEK was performed in 15 eyes of 15 patients (74.9 ± 7.9 years; 4♂, 11♀). DSAEK was performed in 15 eyes of 15 patients (76.5 ± 6.6 years; 4♂, 11♀) using the Carriazo-Pendular-microkeratome and Schwindt artificial anterior chamber. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal geometry assessed using Scheimpflug photography (SP) and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) was regularly measured in 15 matched pairs receiving DSEK or DSAEK. Mean BCVA improved from 1.1 ± 0.5 to 0.5 ± 0.2 logMAR (p = 0.001) after DSEK and from 1.0 ± 0.5 to 0.2 ± 0.2 logMAR (p = 0.001) in the DSAEK-group. After 6 months, BCVA was significantly better in the DSAEK-group. Corneal refractive power decreased from 36.9 ± 1.5 to 35.9 ± 1.3 D (p = 0.01) in the DSEK-group and from 37.7 ± 1.6 to 36.4 ± 1.6 D (p = 0.01) in the DSAEK-group. The corneal back surface radius changed from 6.05 ± 1.6 to 5.82 ± 0.45 in the DSEK (p = 0.03) and from 6.72 ± 0.96 to 5.39 ± 0.33 in the DSAEK-group (p = 0.01). Mean central corneal thickness (CCT) measured by SP decreased from 741 ± 105 to 605 ± 63 µm (p = 0.26) after DSEK and from 700 ± 98 to 607 ± 88 µm (p = 0.01) after DSAEK. At no point in time during follow-up, mean CCT was significantly different in both groups. The ratio between central and peripheral transplant thickness decreased slightly from 0.65 ± 0.16 to 0.59 ± 0.16 after DSEK (p = 0.57) and from 0.52 ± 0.08 to 0.43 ± 0.14 after DSAEK (p = 0.17). The ratio difference between DSEK and DSAEK-groups was not statistically significant. The use of a pendular microkeratome for DSAEK results in faster visual rehabilitation but does not decrease the surgically induced change of cornea-based hyperopisation which is due to posterior corneal curvature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25070247     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-014-9980-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  24 in total

1.  Sutureless, posterior lamellar keratoplasty: a case report of a modified technique.

Authors:  Gerrit R J Melles; Frank Lander; Carla Nieuwendaal
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Posterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Authors:  C W TILLETT
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1956-03       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Monitoring cornea and graft morphometric dynamics after descemet stripping and endothelial keratoplasty with anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Dorota Tarnawska; Edward Wylegala
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Planar flaps with the Carriazo-Pendular microkeratome.

Authors:  Diego de Ortueta
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Eine erfolgreiche totale Keratoplastik (A successful total keratoplasty). 1906.

Authors:  E K Zirm
Journal:  Refract Corneal Surg       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug

6.  Posterior lamellar keratoplasty for a case of pseudophakic bullous keratopathy.

Authors:  G R Melles; F Lander; W H Beekhuis; L Remeijer; P S Binder
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Michael Rudolph; Kathrin Laaser; Bjoern O Bachmann; Claus Cursiefen; Daniel Epstein; Friedrich E Kruse
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  [1-year results after posterior lamellar keratoplasty with manually dissected donor tissue].

Authors:  K K Weller; J D Unterlauft; G Geerling
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 0.700

9.  Endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs' dystrophy with cataract: complications and clinical results with the new triple procedure.

Authors:  Mark A Terry; Neda Shamie; Edwin S Chen; Paul M Phillips; Anand K Shah; Karen L Hoar; Daniel J Friend
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-02-08       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant.

Authors:  Francis W Price; Marianne O Price
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  1 in total

1.  Corneal Structural Changes in Congenital Glaucoma.

Authors:  Jennifer Drechsler; Adrianna Lee; Snehaa Maripudi; Laura Kueny; Moran R Levin; Osamah J Saeedi; Marlet Bazemore; Bethany Karwoski; Richard Birdsong; Camilo Martinez; Mohamad S Jaafar; Sairah Yousaf; Zubair M Ahmed; William P Madigan; Janet Leath Alexander
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.152

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.