Literature DB >> 23661098

Visual outcome and histological findings following femtosecond laser-assisted versus microkeratome-assisted DSAEK.

S Heinzelmann1, P Maier, D Böhringer, C Auw-Hädrich, T Reinhard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the visual outcome of femtosecond laser-assisted Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) to microkeratome-assisted DSAEK as well as to contrast precut versus surgeon-cut grafts. Histologic characterization of failed DSAEK grafts was performed in order to correlate ultrastructural changes with graft failures.
METHODS: In this case control study, 47 cases of DSAEK were investigated in terms of visual acuity, keratometric astigmatism, spherical equivalent, endothelial cell count, and postoperative complications. We formed three groups: the femtosecondlaser-assisted DSAEK with precut grafts, the microkeratome-assisted DSAEK with precut and with surgeon-cut grafts. Mean follow-up was 6 months. In the case of graft failure, penetrating keratoplasty was performed, and the excised corneal buttons were investigated by light and electron microscopy.
RESULTS: Microkeratome-assisted DSAEK lead to better visual outcome than femtosecond laser-assisted DSAEK. Keratometric astigmatism, spherical equivalent and endothelial cell count did not differ significantly between both methods. Precut and surgeon-cut grafts in microkeratome-assisted DSAEK did not show any significant difference regarding all upraised parameters. No definite histological correlate for graft failure following femtosecond laser-assisted DSAEK was found.
CONCLUSIONS: Femtosecond laser-assisted DSAEK is not the method of choice, and needs further technical improvement. However, failed femtosecondlaser-assisted DSAEK grafts did not show significant histological changes related to the technique to explain reduced visual acuity. In microkeratome-assisted DSAEK, the preparation time point of the graft does not seem to influence the visual and optical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23661098     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-013-2359-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  24 in total

1.  Corneal wound healing after photorefractive keratectomy: a 3-year confocal microscopy study.

Authors:  Jay C Erie
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2003

Review 2.  Endothelial keratoplasty - a review.

Authors:  Marianne O Price; Francis W Price
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.207

3.  Posterior lamellar keratoplasty: DLEK to DSEK to DMEK.

Authors:  Gerrit R J Melles
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Histopathologic examination of failed grafts in descemet's stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Leejee H Suh; Daniel G Dawson; Lejla Mutapcic; Steven I Rosenfeld; William W Culbertson; Sonia H Yoo; Terrence P O'Brien; Sander R Dubovy
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-02-08       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 5.  Graft survival and endothelial outcomes in the new era of endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Sanjay V Patel
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.467

6.  Three-year visual acuity outcomes after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Jennifer Y Li; Mark A Terry; Jeffrey Goshe; David Davis-Boozer; Neda Shamie
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 7.  Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: innovations in surgical technique.

Authors:  Neelofar Ghaznawi; Edwin S Chen
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.761

8.  Femtosecond laser-assisted posterior lamellar keratoplasty: initial studies of surgical technique in eye bank eyes.

Authors:  H Kaz Soong; Shahzad Mian; Omar Abbasi; Tibor Juhasz
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Primary graft failure after Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: clinico-pathological study.

Authors:  Jodhbir Singh Mehta; Jocelyn Chua; Rebekah Poh; Roger Wilmer Beuerman; Donald Tan
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.651

10.  Corneal endothelial viability after femtosecond laser preparation of posterior lamellar discs for Descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Yanny Y Y Cheng; Elisabeth Pels; Jack P M Cleutjens; Robert J van Suylen; Fred Hendrikse; Rudy M M A Nuijts
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.651

View more
  10 in total

1.  Outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty from a single centre study.

Authors:  S Heinzelmann; D Böhringer; P Eberwein; T Reinhard; P Maier
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Deep Laser-Assisted Lamellar Anterior Keratoplasty With Microkeratome-Cut Grafts.

Authors:  Hideaki Yokogawa; Maolong Tang; Yan Li; Liang Liu; Winston Chamberlain; David Huang
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Effects of corneal irregular astigmatism on visual acuity after conventional and femtosecond laser-assisted Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Daisuke Tomida; Takefumi Yamaguchi; Akiko Ogawa; Yumiko Hirayama; Seika Shimazaki-Den; Yoshiyuki Satake; Jun Shimazaki
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Graft dislocation and graft failure following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) using precut tissue: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sonja Heinzelmann; Daniel Böhringer; Philipp Eberwein; Thomas Reinhard; Philip Maier
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Comparative study of corneal endothelial cell damage after femtosecond laser assisted deep stromal dissection.

Authors:  Ting Liu; Jingjing Zhang; Dapeng Sun; Wenjie Sui; Yangyang Zhang; Dongfang Li; Zhaoli Chen; Hua Gao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Analysis of the changes in keratoplasty indications and preferred techniques.

Authors:  Stefan J Lang; Mona Bischoff; Daniel Böhringer; Berthold Seitz; Thomas Reinhard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy.

Authors:  Mayank A Nanavaty; Xue Wang; Alex J Shortt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-02-14

Review 8.  The evolution of corneal and refractive surgery with the femtosecond laser.

Authors:  Antonis Aristeidou; Elise V Taniguchi; Michael Tsatsos; Rodrigo Muller; Colm McAlinden; Roberto Pineda; Eleftherios I Paschalis
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2015-07-14

9.  Influence of microkeratome parameters on the stromal bed and flap edge quality in laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Jens Heichel; Frank Wilhelm; Kathleen S Kunert; Rabea Schlueter; Ute Stuhltraeger; Thomas Hammer
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-12-17

10.  Surface quality and endothelial cell viability after femtosecond laser-assisted donor lenticule preparation for endothelial keratoplasty - An in-vitro study.

Authors:  Jeewan S Titiyal; M J Aravind; Manpreet Kaur; Tapas C Nag; Namrata Sharma; Tushar Agarwal; Rajesh Sinha
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.848

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.