Literature DB >> 19643240

Factors predicting successful microsurgical vasectomy reversal.

Harris M Nagler1, Howard Jung.   

Abstract

A man who desires restoration of fertility after vasectomy has two main treatment options for having his genetic child: vasectomy reversal or sperm extraction with subsequent in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Microsurgical reconstructive techniques and their widespread availability have made vasectomy reversal a realistic option for many couples; however, vasectomy reversal outcomes are varied because there are many factors that alter the chance of success. Some of these factors become known preoperatively, whereas others can only be ascertained at the time of surgery. Intraoperatively, the urologist must identify factors and understand how they will affect the decision to proceed. This article systematically reviews each of these phases of decision-making and management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19643240     DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2009.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  7 in total

1.  Robotic vasovasostomy: description of technique and review of initial results.

Authors:  Michael G Santomauro; Chong H Choe; James O L'Esperance; Brian K Auge
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-07-08

Review 2.  [45 years of microsurgery in urology : Contemporary witnesses report with special reference to vasectomy reversal].

Authors:  Horst Oesterwitz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Factors predicting success after microsurgical vasovasostomy.

Authors:  Marco Cosentino; Maria F Peraza; Alvaro Vives; Josvany Sanchez; Daniel Moreno; Judith Perona; Gerardo Ortiz; Maria Alcoba; Eduardo Ruiz; Joaquim Sarquella
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Predictors of success after bilateral epididymovasostomy performed during vasectomy reversal: A multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Jesse Ory; Sirpi Nackeeran; Udi Blankstein; Joshua T White; Ethan Grober; Sheldon H Marks; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 5.  Current status of vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  J Ullrich Schwarzer; Heiko Steinfatt
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Microsurgical Management of Male Infertility: Compelling Evidence That Collaboration with Qualified Male Reproductive Urologists Enhances Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Outcomes.

Authors:  Jessica Marinaro; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 7.  Vasectomy reversal: a clinical update.

Authors:  Abhishek P Patel; Ryan P Smith
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.