Literature DB >> 19642020

Are prediction models for Lynch syndrome valid for probands with endometrial cancer?

Floor J Backes1, Heather Hampel, Katherine A Backes, Luis Vaccarello, George Lewandowski, Jeffrey A Bell, Gary C Reid, Larry J Copeland, Jeffrey M Fowler, David E Cohn.   

Abstract

Currently, three prediction models are used to predict a patient's risk of having Lynch syndrome (LS). These models have been validated in probands with colorectal cancer (CRC), but not in probands presenting with endometrial cancer (EMC). Thus, the aim was to determine the performance of these prediction models in women with LS presenting with EMC. Probands with EMC and LS were identified. Personal and family history was entered into three prediction models, PREMM(1,2), MMRpro, and MMRpredict. Probabilities of mutations in the mismatch repair genes were recorded. Accurate prediction was defined as a model predicting at least a 5% chance of a proband carrying a mutation. From 562 patients prospectively enrolled in a clinical trial of patients with EMC, 13 (2.2%) were shown to have LS. Nine patients had a mutation in MSH6, three in MSH2, and one in MLH1. MMRpro predicted that 3 of 9 patients with an MSH6, 3 of 3 with an MSH2, and 1 of 1 patient with an MLH1 mutation could have LS. For MMRpredict, EMC coded as "proximal CRC" predicted 5 of 5, and as "distal CRC" three of five. PREMM(1,2) predicted that 4 of 4 with an MLH1 or MSH2 could have LS. Prediction of LS in probands presenting with EMC using current models for probands with CRC works reasonably well. Further studies are needed to develop models that include questions specific to patients with EMC with a greater age range, as well as placing increased emphasis on prediction of LS in probands with MSH6 mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19642020     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-009-9273-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  23 in total

1.  Refining the Amsterdam Criteria and Bethesda Guidelines: testing algorithms for the prediction of mismatch repair mutation status in the familial cancer clinic.

Authors:  L R Lipton; V Johnson; C Cummings; S Fisher; P Risby; A T Eftekhar Sadat; T Cranston; L Izatt; P Sasieni; S V Hodgson; H J W Thomas; I P M Tomlinson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Cancer risk in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: later age of onset.

Authors:  Heather Hampel; Julie A Stephens; Eero Pukkala; Risto Sankila; Lauri A Aaltonen; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Albert de la Chapelle
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Screening for Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) among endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Heather Hampel; Wendy Frankel; Jenny Panescu; Janet Lockman; Kaisa Sotamaa; Daniel Fix; Ilene Comeras; Jennifer La Jeunesse; Hidewaki Nakagawa; Judith A Westman; Thomas W Prior; Mark Clendenning; Pamela Penzone; Janet Lombardi; Patti Dunn; David E Cohn; Larry Copeland; Lynne Eaton; Jeffrey Fowler; George Lewandowski; Luis Vaccarello; Jeffrey Bell; Gary Reid; Albert de la Chapelle
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Gynecologic cancer as a "sentinel cancer" for women with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome.

Authors:  Karen H Lu; Mai Dinh; Wendy Kohlmann; Patrice Watson; Jane Green; Sapna Syngal; Prathap Bandipalliam; Lee-May Chen; Brian Allen; Peggy Conrad; Jonathan Terdiman; Charlotte Sun; Molly Daniels; Thomas Burke; David M Gershenson; Henry Lynch; Patrick Lynch; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  New clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome) proposed by the International Collaborative group on HNPCC.

Authors:  H F Vasen; P Watson; J P Mecklin; H T Lynch
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Prophylactic surgery to reduce the risk of gynecologic cancers in the Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Kathleen M Schmeler; Henry T Lynch; Lee-may Chen; Mark F Munsell; Pamela T Soliman; Mary Beth Clark; Molly S Daniels; Kristin G White; Stephanie G Boyd-Rogers; Peggy G Conrad; Kathleen Y Yang; Mary M Rubin; Charlotte C Sun; Brian M Slomovitz; David M Gershenson; Karen H Lu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Prediction of MLH1 and MSH2 mutations in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Judith Balmaña; David H Stockwell; Ewout W Steyerberg; Elena M Stoffel; Amie M Deffenbaugh; Julia E Reid; Brian Ward; Thomas Scholl; Brant Hendrickson; John Tazelaar; Lynn Anne Burbidge; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Lower incidence of colorectal cancer and later age of disease onset in 27 families with pathogenic MSH6 germline mutations compared with families with MLH1 or MSH2 mutations: the German Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Consortium.

Authors:  Jens Plaschke; Christoph Engel; Stefan Krüger; Elke Holinski-Feder; Constanze Pagenstecher; Elisabeth Mangold; Gabriela Moeslein; Karsten Schulmann; Johannes Gebert; Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz; Josef Rüschoff; Markus Loeffler; Hans K Schackert
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Cancer risk in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer due to MSH6 mutations: impact on counseling and surveillance.

Authors:  Yvonne M C Hendriks; Anja Wagner; Hans Morreau; Fred Menko; Astrid Stormorken; Franz Quehenberger; Lodewijk Sandkuijl; Pal Møller; Maurizio Genuardi; Hans Van Houwelingen; Carli Tops; Marjo Van Puijenbroek; Paul Verkuijlen; Gemma Kenter; Anneke Van Mil; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Gita B Tan; Martijn H Breuning; Riccardo Fodde; Juul Th Wijnen; Annette H J T Bröcker-Vriends; Hans Vasen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Gene-related cancer spectrum in families with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC).

Authors:  Johanne Geary; Peter Sasieni; Richard Houlston; Louise Izatt; Ros Eeles; Stewart J Payne; Samantha Fisher; Shirley V Hodgson
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 2.375

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory Assays in Evaluation of Lynch Syndrome in Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Bojana Djordjevic; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Surg Pathol Clin       Date:  2016-04-11

2.  Acceptance of genetic counseling and testing in a hospital-based series of patients with gynecological cancer.

Authors:  Nicky Dekker; Eleonora B L van Dorst; Rob B van der Luijt; Marielle E van Gijn; Marc van Tuil; Johan A Offerhaus; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Performance of PREMM(1,2,6), MMRpredict, and MMRpro in detecting Lynch syndrome among endometrial cancer cases.

Authors:  Rowena C Mercado; Heather Hampel; Fay Kastrinos; Ewout Steyerberg; Judith Balmana; Elena Stoffel; David E Cohn; Floor J Backes; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins; Noralane M Lindor; Graham Casey; Robert Haile; Subha Madhavan; Albert de la Chapelle; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Combined Microsatellite Instability, MLH1 Methylation Analysis, and Immunohistochemistry for Lynch Syndrome Screening in Endometrial Cancers From GOG210: An NRG Oncology and Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  Paul J Goodfellow; Caroline C Billingsley; Heather A Lankes; Shamshad Ali; David E Cohn; Russell J Broaddus; Nilsa Ramirez; Colin C Pritchard; Heather Hampel; Alexis S Chassen; Luke V Simmons; Amy P Schmidt; Feng Gao; Louise A Brinton; Floor Backes; Lisa M Landrum; Melissa A Geller; Paul A DiSilvestro; Michael L Pearl; Shashikant B Lele; Matthew A Powell; Richard J Zaino; David Mutch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 44.544

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.