Literature DB >> 19641347

Consumer perception and insights on fats and fatty acids: knowledge on the quality of diet fat.

Connie Diekman1, Kim Malcolm.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research indicates that consumers do not understand dietary fat, either the importance of the quality or the quantity of fats needed for health. Previous consumer surveys suggest the priority placed on fat in various nutrition communications (i.e., low fat or reduction in fats) has contributed to this confusion.
METHODS: This consumer study was carried out in 16 countries in two waves, investigating in total 6,426 subjects. The survey was conducted by phone, internet and face-to-face interviews, depending on the acceptable method for the population. Participants, aged 18-70 years, were the main family shopper.
RESULTS: Knowledge about fat is conflicted, including which fats have health benefits; 59% of respondents think fat should be avoided, 65% think a low-fat diet is a healthy diet and 38% claim to avoid foods containing fat. Respondents were aware of different types of fats but did not know which ones were healthier. Omegas have the greatest level of recognition but at the same time many people do not realize they are fats.
CONCLUSIONS: Around half of consumers do not know whether fats are good or bad, meaning they do not know what to eat. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19641347     DOI: 10.1159/000220824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Nutr Metab        ISSN: 0250-6807            Impact factor:   3.374


  8 in total

1.  Adverse outcomes associated with media exposure to contradictory nutrition messages.

Authors:  Rebekah H Nagler
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2013-10-11

Review 2.  Dietary Patterns and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in People with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  M Carolina Archundia Herrera; Fatheema B Subhan; Catherine B Chan
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2017-12

3.  Measuring Media Exposure to Contradictory Health Information: A Comparative Analysis of Four Potential Measures.

Authors:  Rebekah H Nagler; Robert C Hornik
Journal:  Commun Methods Meas       Date:  2012-03-02

4.  Postprandial Glycaemic, Hormonal and Satiety Responses to Rice and Kiwifruit Preloads in Chinese Adults: A Randomised Controlled Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Alex Lubransky; John Monro; Suman Mishra; Hui Yu; Jillian J Haszard; Bernard J Venn
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Types of Nutrition Knowledge, Their Socio-Demographic Determinants and Their Association With Food Consumption: Results of the NEMONIT Study.

Authors:  Franziska Koch; Ingrid Hoffmann; Erika Claupein
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-02-12

6.  The effect of a nutrition education intervention on knowledge, attitude, and intake of foods high in fats in women.

Authors:  Fatemeh Zeynalzadeh Borjloo; Tahereh Dehdari; Jamileh Abolghasemi; Fatemehsadat Amiri; Ali Vasheghani-Farahani
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2021-06-30

7.  Primary Barriers of Adherence to a Structured Nutritional Intervention in Patients with Dyslipidemia.

Authors:  Fabiola Mabel Del Razo-Olvera; Angélica J Martin-Vences; Griselda X Brito-Córdova; Daniel Elías-López; María Victoria Landa-Anell; Marco Antonio Melgarejo-Hernández; Ivette Cruz-Bautista; Iliana Manjarrez-Martínez; Donají Verónica Gómez-Velasco; Carlos Alberto Aguilar-Salinas
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 8.  A healthy approach to dietary fats: understanding the science and taking action to reduce consumer confusion.

Authors:  Ann G Liu; Nikki A Ford; Frank B Hu; Kathleen M Zelman; Dariush Mozaffarian; Penny M Kris-Etherton
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.271

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.