Literature DB >> 16116565

Intrauterine growth restriction and fetal body composition.

G Larciprete1, H Valensise, G Di Pierro, B Vasapollo, B Casalino, D Arduini, S Jarvis, E Cirese.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the differences in fetal body compartments between fetuses with normal growth and those with reduced intrauterine growth, during the third trimester, through ultrasonographic determination of subcutaneous tissue thickness (SCTT).
METHODS: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled into this case control study carried out at 30-31 weeks' gestation. Two study groups were matched for maternal age and pregestational body mass index: controls (n = 14) and intrauterine growth-restricted (IUGR) fetuses (n = 14). Routine ultrasound-derived biometric parameters (head circumference, abdominal circumference, femur length and humerus length) were measured. Additionally, the mid-arm fat mass and lean mass (MAFM and MALM), the mid-thigh fat mass and lean mass (MTFM and MTLM), the abdominal fat mass (AFM) and the subscapular fat mass (SSFM) were measured. The Mann-Whitney U-test and Student's t-test were used to compare the two groups.
RESULTS: The abdominal circumference and the humerus were significantly smaller in IUGR fetuses than in controls. Most of the SCTT values were different in the two groups. The SSFM (3.6 +/- 1.1 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.7 mm; P = 0.011), the AFM (5.1 +/- 0.7 vs. 4 +/- 1 mm; P = 0.01), the MAFM (3.5 +/- 0.9 vs. 2.2 +/- 0.8 cm2; P < 0.01) and MALM (2.1 +/- 0.4 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.5 cm2; P = 0.029) were all significantly greater in fetuses with normal development compared to those with growth restriction.
CONCLUSIONS: During the third trimester, SCTT (with the exception of MTFM and MTLM) is reduced in fetuses with IUGR. Furthermore, MALM is lower in growth-restricted fetuses, confirming that the parameters measured in this study are affected in IUGR fetuses. Our findings indicate that specific changes in fetal body compartments occur as a result of chronic metabolic impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16116565     DOI: 10.1002/uog.1980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  32 in total

1.  Relationship between in utero sonographic evaluation and subcutaneous plicometry after birth in infants with intrauterine growth restriction: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Nadia Liotto; Tatjana Radaelli; Anna Orsi; Emanuela Taricco; Paola Roggero; Maria L Giannì; Dario Consonni; Fabio Mosca; Irene Cetin
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.638

Review 2.  ASAS-SSR Triennnial Reproduction Symposium: Looking Back and Moving Forward-How Reproductive Physiology has Evolved: Fetal origins of impaired muscle growth and metabolic dysfunction: Lessons from the heat-stressed pregnant ewe.

Authors:  Dustin T Yates; Jessica L Petersen; Ty B Schmidt; Caitlin N Cadaret; Taylor L Barnes; Robert J Posont; Kristin A Beede
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Intrauterine growth-restricted sheep fetuses exhibit smaller hindlimb muscle fibers and lower proportions of insulin-sensitive Type I fibers near term.

Authors:  Dustin T Yates; Caitlin N Cadaret; Kristin A Beede; Hannah E Riley; Antoni R Macko; Miranda J Anderson; Leticia E Camacho; Sean W Limesand
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Myoblasts from intrauterine growth-restricted sheep fetuses exhibit intrinsic deficiencies in proliferation that contribute to smaller semitendinosus myofibres.

Authors:  Dustin T Yates; Derek S Clarke; Antoni R Macko; Miranda J Anderson; Leslie A Shelton; Marie Nearing; Ronald E Allen; Robert P Rhoads; Sean W Limesand
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Skeletal muscle protein accretion rates and hindlimb growth are reduced in late gestation intrauterine growth-restricted fetal sheep.

Authors:  Paul J Rozance; Laura Zastoupil; Stephanie R Wesolowski; David A Goldstrohm; Brittany Strahan; Melanie Cree-Green; Melinda Sheffield-Moore; Giacomo Meschia; William W Hay; Randall B Wilkening; Laura D Brown
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Irisin in idiopathic foetal growth restriction.

Authors:  Mete Çağlar; Mehmet Göksu; Bekir Sıtkı Isenlik; Ali Yavuzcan; Musa Yılmaz; Yusuf Üstün; Suleyman Aydin; Selahattin Kumru
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 7.  The intrauterine growth restriction phenotype: fetal adaptations and potential implications for later life insulin resistance and diabetes.

Authors:  Stephanie R Thorn; Paul J Rozance; Laura D Brown; William W Hay
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 1.303

8.  A modified prenatal growth assessment score for the evaluation of fetal growth in the third trimester using single and composite biometric parameters.

Authors:  Russell L Deter; Wesley Lee; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Adi L Tarca; Lami Yeo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2014-07-11

Review 9.  Impact of placental insufficiency on fetal skeletal muscle growth.

Authors:  Laura D Brown; William W Hay
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.102

10.  A fingerprint marker from early gestation associated with diabetes in middle age: the Dutch Hunger Winter Families Study.

Authors:  Henry S Kahn; Mariaelisa Graff; Aryeh D Stein; L H Lumey
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 7.196

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.