Literature DB >> 16835759

Identification of newborns with Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR) in weight and/or length based on constitutional growth potential.

Nicole Mamelle1, Magali Boniol, Olivier Rivière, Marie O Joly, Georges Mellier, Bernard Maria, Bernard Rousset, Olivier Claris.   

Abstract

This study was carried out to build statistical models for defining FGR (Fetal Growth Restriction) in weight and/or length after taking growth potential of an infant into account. From a cohort of pregnant women having given birth to 47,733 infants in 141 French maternity units, two statistical models gave individualized limits of birth weight and birth length (based on the 5th centile) below which, after adjustment for its individual growth potential, a newborn must be considered as FGR in weight and/or in length. A sample of 906 infants had measures taken of cord blood growth factors (IGF1, IGFBP3). The FGR(W) definition (weight<5th centile for growth potential) permitted the identification of infants who presented rates of maternal hypertension (13.6%) and of Apgar score at 5 min<6 (2.9%) higher than in the classical group SGA(W) (weight<5th centile for sex and gestational age) (9.6% and 2.2% respectively). By combining FGR(W) and SGA(W), a subgroup of infants, not currently recognized as SGA, presented very high rates of maternal hypertension (19.9%) and of low Apgar score (3.9%). Conversely a subgroup of infants, currently recognized as SGA(W), had rates as low as in the normal infants group, and had to be considered as "constitutionally small" (that is to say 24% of the SGA(W)). Combining FGR(W) and FGR(L) (length<5th centile of growth potential), 7.6% of infants appeared growth-restricted, and 1.8% appeared constitutionally small in weight and/or in length. The FGR(W)-FGR(L) infants showed the lowest mean values of IGF1 (126.2+/-3.2) and IGFBP3 (0.86+/-0.03). These new definitions of FGR(W) and FGR(L) could help to better identify infants at birth requiring neonatal care, and monitoring of growth catch-up and neurodevelopmental outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16835759     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-005-0045-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  25 in total

1.  Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards.

Authors:  B Clausson; J Gardosi; A Francis; S Cnattingius
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Intrauterine growth restriction increases morbidity and mortality among premature neonates.

Authors:  Thomas J Garite; Reese Clark; James A Thorp
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Individual correction of birth weight for parental stature with special reference to small-for-date and large-for-date infants.

Authors:  P Lazar; J Dreyfus; E Papiernik-Berkauer
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 1.901

4.  Academic achievement of small-for-gestational-age children at age 10 years.

Authors:  Outi Hollo; Päivi Rautava; Tapio Korhonen; Hans Helenius; Pentti Kero; Mattiä Sillanpää
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2002-02

Review 5.  Small for gestational age and intrauterine growth restriction: definitions and standards.

Authors:  R L Goldenberg; S P Cliver
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.190

6.  IGF-I, IGF-II, free IGF-I and IGFBP-1, -2 and -3 levels in venous cord blood: relationship to birthweight, length and gestational age in healthy newborns.

Authors:  D Klauwer; W F Blum; S Hanitsch; W Rascher; P D Lee; W Kiess
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.299

Review 7.  Fetal and infant origins of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  D J Barker; C H Fall
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Are all growth-restricted newborns created equal(ly)?

Authors:  M S Kramer; R Platt; H Yang; H McNamara; R H Usher
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 9.  International Small for Gestational Age Advisory Board consensus development conference statement: management of short children born small for gestational age, April 24-October 1, 2001.

Authors:  Peter A Lee; Steven D Chernausek; Anita C S Hokken-Koelega; Paul Czernichow
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Third trimester fetal growth and umbilical venous blood concentrations of IGF-1, IGFBP-1, and growth hormone at term.

Authors:  J A Spencer; T C Chang; J Jones; S C Robson; M A Preece
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.747

View more
  10 in total

1.  Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies following gastric bypass surgery: a retrospective cohort study in a French referral centre.

Authors:  Pietro Santulli; Laurent Mandelbrot; Enrico Facchiano; Chloé Dussaux; Pierre-François Ceccaldi; Séverine Ledoux; Simon Msika
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Smoking and smoking cessation during early pregnancy and its effect on adverse pregnancy outcomes and fetal growth.

Authors:  Constantine I Vardavas; Leda Chatzi; Evridiki Patelarou; Estel Plana; Katerina Sarri; Anthony Kafatos; Antonis D Koutis; Manolis Kogevinas
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Association of Placental Parameters with Low Birth Weight Among Neonates Born in the Public Hospitals of Hadiya Zone, Southern Ethiopia: An Institution-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Simeon Meskele Leyto; Kusse Urmale Mare
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-05-16

4.  Maternal nutritional history modulates the hepatic IGF-IGFBP axis in adult male rat offspring.

Authors:  Timothy Smith; Deborah M Sloboda; Richard Saffery; Eric Joo; Mark H Vickers
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  Newborn adiposity measured by plethysmography is not predicted by late gestation two-dimensional ultrasound measures of fetal growth.

Authors:  Laurie J Moyer-Mileur; Hillarie Slater; J Anne Thomson; Nicole Mihalopoulos; Jan Byrne; Michael W Varner
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Early diagnosis and treatment referral of children born small for gestational age without catch-up growth are critical for optimal growth outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher P Houk; Peter A Lee
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2012-05-04

7.  Being Small for Gestational Age: Does it Matter for the Neurodevelopment of Premature Infants? A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Myriam Bickle Graz; Jean-François Tolsa; Céline Julie Fischer Fumeaux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Exposure to Bisphenol A and Phthalates during Pregnancy and Ultrasound Measures of Fetal Growth in the INMA-Sabadell Cohort.

Authors:  Maribel Casas; Damaskini Valvi; Ana Ballesteros-Gomez; Mireia Gascon; Mariana F Fernández; Raquel Garcia-Esteban; Carmen Iñiguez; David Martínez; Mario Murcia; Nuria Monfort; Noelia Luque; Soledad Rubio; Rosa Ventura; Jordi Sunyer; Martine Vrijheid
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Influence of the umbilical cord insertion site on the optimal individual birth weight achievement.

Authors:  Sophie Brouillet; Anaïs Dufour; Fabien Prot; Jean-Jacques Feige; Véronique Equy; Nadia Alfaidy; Pierre Gillois; Pascale Hoffmann
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Self-reported parental exposure to pesticide during pregnancy and birth outcomes: the MecoExpo cohort study.

Authors:  Flora Mayhoub; Thierry Berton; Véronique Bach; Karine Tack; Caroline Deguines; Adeline Floch-Barneaud; Sophie Desmots; Erwan Stéphan-Blanchard; Karen Chardon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.