Literature DB >> 11519569

Auditory detection of hollowness.

R A Lutfi1.   

Abstract

The airborne sounds produced by freely vibrating hollow and solid bars were synthesized according to the equations of bar motion from theoretical acoustics, and were presented to listeners over headphones. In a two-interval, forced-choice task, listeners were asked to distinguish between the hollow and solid bar sounds as bar length was varied at random from one presentation to the next. All other physical properties of the bar were held constant across trials. Listener decision strategies for detecting hollowness in iron, aluminum, and wood bars were determined from regression weights describing the relation between the listener's response and the frequency, intensity, and decay modulus of the individual partials comprising these sounds. The obtained weights were compared to those of a hypothetical listener that bases judgments on the acoustic relations intrinsic to hollowness, as determined from the equations for motion. Results indicate that listeners adopt roughly one of two decision strategies, either basing judgments on the appropriate acoustic relations, or basing judgments predominantly on frequency alone. The decision strategy of some listeners also changed from one type to the other with a change in bar material or upon replication of the same condition. The results are interpreted in terms of the vulnerability of the intrinsic acoustic relations to small perturbations in acoustic parameters, as would be associated with listener internal noise. They demonstrate that basic limits of human sensitivity can have a profound effect on the identification of rudimentary source attributes from sound, even in conditions where acoustic variation is largely dictated by physical variation in the source.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11519569     DOI: 10.1121/1.1385903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Psychophysical reverse correlation with multiple response alternatives.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  A new approach to sound source segregation.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Ching-Ju Liu; Christophe N J Stoelinga
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Sensory constraints on auditory identification of the material and geometric properties of struck bars.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Christophe N J Stoelinga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Limiting unwanted cues via random rove applied to the yes-no and multiple-alternative forced choice paradigms.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory discrimination of force of impact.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Ching-Ju Liu; Christophe N J Stoelinga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Modeling manner of contact in the synthesis of impact sounds for perceptual research.

Authors:  Christophe N J Stoelinga; Robert A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Discrimination of the spectral density of multitone complexes.

Authors:  Christophe N J Stoelinga; Robert A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Neural and behavioral investigations into timbre perception.

Authors:  Stephen M Town; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-13

9.  Metal Sounds Stiffer than Drums for Ears, but Not Always for Hands: Low-Level Auditory Features Affect Multisensory Stiffness Perception More than High-Level Categorical Information.

Authors:  Juan Liu; Hiroshi Ando
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  On the generalization of tones: A detailed exploration of non-speech auditory perception stimuli.

Authors:  Michael Schutz; Jessica Gillard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.