Literature DB >> 19638905

Subcutaneous mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola skin: broadening the indications.

Stefan Paepke1, Rainer Schmid, Stefanie Fleckner, Daniela Paepke, Markus Niemeyer, Barbara Schmalfeldt, Volker R Jacobs, Marion Kiechle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous authors take multiple predictive factors into account to decide whether or not the nipple-areola complex (NAC) can be conserved during mastectomy. These factors include the tumor-nipple distance, tumor size, axillary lymph node status, and lymphovascular invasion. Thus only a very limited percentage of patients can keep their NAC. If the breast gland tissue and all milk ducts can be separated completely from the nipple-areola skin (NA-skin) during subcutaneous mastectomy (SCM), conservation of the NA-skin is feasible even in the case of large, central, and retroareolar tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 2003 to May 2006, we performed 109 SCMs on 96 patients. Total mastectomy was indicated in 94 of these breasts, in 16 because of extensive ductal carcinoma in situ, and 78 breasts with invasive carcinoma required additional axillary dissection resulting in indication for modified radical mastectomy. At least 33 of the breasts had malignancy underneath the skin within the areolar margin (centrally located tumors). After dissection of all the breast tissue, the skin envelope with the areola is turned inside out and all milk ducts and any tissue beneath the areola are precisely dissected under the surgeon's visual control. Frozen sections and HE histopathologic examination of this retroareolar tissue next to the skin are requested to decide whether the NA-skin can be preserved or not. This study was registered on the www.clinicaltrials.com website and has the following identification number ID: NCT00641628.
RESULTS: We found it necessary to dissect the NA-skin in 13 of 109 breasts (12%), altering the procedure to a skin sparing mastectomy. Necrosis of the NA-skin requiring surgical intervention occurred in only 1 of the conserved 96 breasts. After follow-up of 20 to 54 months (median: 34 months), no recurrence within the nipple-areola region was observed. One local recurrence on the chest wall and 1 axillary recurrence were detected. Of 96 patients, 2 developed distant metastases. One death was recorded. Occasionally, partial necrosis of the nipple occurred, with residual depigmentation of the skin but a good or excellent cosmetic result was maintained in most cases.
CONCLUSION: SCM with NAC-skin conservation may be performed according to total mastectomy indications if an intraoperative frozen section (and the corresponding HE histopathology) of the tissue next to the nipple-areola skin is free of tumor. The remaining contraindications for SCM are: extensive tumor involvement of the skin, inflammatory breast cancer, and a clinically suspicious nipple.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19638905     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b0c7d8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  22 in total

Review 1.  What is the evidence behind conservative mastectomies?

Authors:  Nicola Rocco; Giuseppe Catanuto; Maurizio Bruno Nava
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

2.  Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy - Extended Indications and Limitations.

Authors:  Markus Niemeyera; Johannes Ettla; Birgit Plattnera; Rainer Schmida; Daniel Müllerb; Hans-Günther Machensb; Marion Kiechlea; Stefan Paepkea
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Long-term follow-up of nipple-sparing mastectomy without radiotherapy: a single center study at a Japanese institution.

Authors:  Teruhisa Sakurai; Ning Zhang; Takaomi Suzuma; Teiji Umemura; Goro Yoshimura; Takeo Sakurai; Qifeng Yang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 4.  Immediate nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy reconstruction: An update on oncological and reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Eduardo Montag; José Roberto Filassi; Rolf Gemperli
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

5.  Nipple-areola-complex sparing mastectomy: five years of experience in a single centre.

Authors:  Antonio Tancredi; Luigi Ciuffreda; Lucia Petito; Francesca Natale; Roberto Murgo
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-07-26

6.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients: The role of adjuvant radiotherapy (Review).

Authors:  Stefan Janssen; Edna Holz-Sapra; Dirk Rades; Alexander Moser; Gabriela Studer
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Pure hemi-periareolar incision versus conventional lateral radial incision mastectomy and direct-to-implant breast reconstructions: comparison of indocyanine green angiographic perfusion and necrosis of the nipple.

Authors:  Jin-Woo Park; Ik Hyun Seong; Woosung Lim; Kyong-Je Woo
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-10

8.  Feasibility of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients with Tumor-Nipple Distance Less Than 2.0 cm.

Authors:  Jai Min Ryu; Seok Jin Nam; Seok Won Kim; Se Kyung Lee; Soo Youn Bae; Ha Woo Yi; Sungmin Park; Hyun-June Paik; Jeong Eon Lee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  The effect of incision choice on outcomes of nipple-sparing mastectomy reconstruction.

Authors:  Vinay Rawlani; Julia Fiuk; Sarah A Johnson; Donald W Buck; Elliot Hirsch; Nora Hansen; Seema Khan; Neil A Fine; John Ys Kim
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2011

Review 10.  Nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Bruna S Mota; Rachel Riera; Marcos Desidério Ricci; Jessica Barrett; Tiago B de Castria; Álvaro N Atallah; Jose Luiz B Bevilacqua
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.