Literature DB >> 23204883

The effect of incision choice on outcomes of nipple-sparing mastectomy reconstruction.

Vinay Rawlani1, Julia Fiuk, Sarah A Johnson, Donald W Buck, Elliot Hirsch, Nora Hansen, Seema Khan, Neil A Fine, John Ys Kim.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The indications for nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) are broadening as more breast surgeons appreciate the utility of preserving the nipple-areolar complex. A number of incision locations are available to the mastectomy surgeon, including inframammary, lateral and periareolar approaches. The present study investigated the effect of these three incisions on reconstructive outcomes; specifically, nipple necrosis.
METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective review of 37 breast NSM reconstructions treated with immediate tissue expander reconstruction with acellular dermis between 2007 and 2008 was performed. The primary outcome was the incidence of nipple necrosis associated with periareolar, lateral and inframammary incisions. Secondary outcomes were the effects of radiation, chemotherapy and breast size on nipple necrosis.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven breast procedures performed on 20 patients were included in the present study. Periareolar incisions were used in 21 cases, lateral incisions in 14 and inframammary incisions in two. The periareolar incision was associated with a significantly higher incidence of nipple necrosis compared with lateral or inframammary incisions (38.1% versus 6.3%, P=0.028). Patients receiving breast radiation (45.5% versus 15.4%, P=0.066) and those with larger breast size (540.4 g versus 425.7 g, P=0.130) also demonstrated a modest trend toward an increased rate of nipple necrosis.
CONCLUSION: The periareolar incision results in a higher rate of nipple necrosis following NSM and immediate tissue expander breast reconstruction. Using the lateral or inframammary incision reduces the incidence of nipple necrosis and may help improve overall reconstructive and cosmetic outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acellular dermis; Breast reconstruction; Nipple necrosis; Nipple-areola complex; Nipple-sparing mastectomy; Tissue expansion

Year:  2011        PMID: 23204883      PMCID: PMC3269196          DOI: 10.1177/229255031101900410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Plast Surg        ISSN: 1195-2199


  27 in total

1.  Subcutaneous mastectomy for benign breast lesions with immediate or delayed prosthetic replacement.

Authors:  B S FREEMAN
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull       Date:  1962-12

2.  Total skin-sparing mastectomy without preservation of the nipple-areola complex.

Authors:  Aaron G Margulies; Julio Hochberg; Julie Kepple; Ronda S Henry-Tillman; Kent Westbrook; V Suzanne Klimberg
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  D K Wellisch; W S Schain; R B Noone; J W Little
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Nipple sparing subcutaneous mastectomy: sixty-six months follow-up.

Authors:  F Caruso; M Ferrara; G Castiglione; G Trombetta; L De Meo; G Catanuto; G Carillio
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 4.424

5.  Necrotic complications after nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Andrzej L Komorowski; Vittorio Zanini; Lea Regolo; Adriana Carolei; Wojciech M Wysocki; Alberto Costa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy in association with intra operative radiotherapy (ELIOT): A new type of mastectomy for breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Jean Yves Petit; Umberto Veronesi; Roberto Orecchia; Alberto Luini; Piercarlo Rey; Mattia Intra; Florence Didier; Stefano Martella; Mario Rietjens; Cristina Garusi; Francesca DeLorenzi; Giovanna Gatti; Maria Elena Leon; Chiara Casadio
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem?

Authors:  Virgilio Sacchini; José A Pinotti; Alfredo C S D Barros; Alberto Luini; Alfonso Pluchinotta; Marianne Pinotti; Marcelo G Boratto; Marco D Ricci; Carlos A Ruiz; Antonio C Nisida; Paolo Veronesi; Jean Petit; Paolo Arnone; Fabio Bassi; Joseph J Disa; Carlos A Garcia-Etienne; Patrick I Borgen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy. Preliminary results.

Authors:  G Bistoni; A Rulli; L Izzo; G Noya; C Alfano; F Barberini
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-12

9.  Nipple sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: a short term analysis of our experience.

Authors:  A Psaila; M Pozzi; L Barone Adesi; A Varanese; M Costantini; P Gullo; M Panimolle; P Pugliese; C Botti; F Di Filippo; R De Vita
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-09

10.  Tissue oxygen measurements in delayed skin flaps: a reconsideration of the mechanisms of the delay phenomenon.

Authors:  K Jonsson; T K Hunt; S S Brennan; S J Mathes
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  20 in total

1.  A geometric analysis of mastectomy incisions: Optimizing intraoperative breast volume.

Authors:  David Chopp; Vinay Rawlani; Marco Ellis; Sarah A Johnson; Donald W Buck; Seema Khan; Kevin Bethke; Nora Hansen; John Ys Kim
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2011

Review 2.  What is the evidence behind conservative mastectomies?

Authors:  Nicola Rocco; Giuseppe Catanuto; Maurizio Bruno Nava
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 3.  The breast surgeons' approach to mastectomy and prepectoral breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Toni Storm-Dickerson; Noemi M Sigalove
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-02

Review 4.  Trends and controversies in multidisciplinary care of the patient with breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura S Dominici; Monica Morrow; Elizabeth Mittendorf; Jennifer Bellon; Tari A King
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 5.  Radiotherapy and nipple-areolar complex necrosis after nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yajuan Zheng; Miaochun Zhong; Chao Ni; Hongjun Yuan; Jingxia Zhang
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Pure hemi-periareolar incision versus conventional lateral radial incision mastectomy and direct-to-implant breast reconstructions: comparison of indocyanine green angiographic perfusion and necrosis of the nipple.

Authors:  Jin-Woo Park; Ik Hyun Seong; Woosung Lim; Kyong-Je Woo
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-10

Review 7.  Conservative mastectomies: an overview.

Authors:  Maurizio Bruno Nava; Nicola Rocco; Giuseppe Catanuto
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 8.  Nipple areola complex sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Camilla Rossi; Matteo Mingozzi; Annalisa Curcio; Federico Buggi; Secondo Folli
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 9.  Clinical outcomes of patients after nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction based on the expander/implant technique.

Authors:  Uhi Toh; Miki Takenaka; Nobutaka Iwakuma; Yoshito Akagi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Nipple sparing mastectomy and direct to implant breast reconstruction, validation of the safe procedure through the use of laser assisted indocyanine green fluorescent angiography.

Authors:  Roy de Vita; Ernesto Maria Buccheri
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.