Literature DB >> 19638788

Further insights into the roles of the medical educator: the importance of scholarly management.

John Bligh1, Julie Brice.   

Abstract

Medical educators need to be able to define excellence within the various roles they occupy so that they can demonstrate internationally recognized, high-quality scholarship. Previous definitions of scholarship have focused on research and teaching but have been unable to integrate other roles such as leadership, management, and administration. Clearer definition of the various roles of the medical educator, coupled with a broader understanding of medical education scholarship that is able to encompass management, as well as teaching and research, will help institutions to evaluate and reward faculty members appropriately. We propose that management should now be introduced as a third "priority of the professoriate." We outline the concept of the scholarly manager, particularly as it applies to management in medical education. We offer a new conceptual model which situates the role of the academic manager within the scholarship of medical education and shows it to be an essential part of the skills and competences of the excellent medical educator. We emphasize that at the heart of all scholarly activity in medical education lie the core skills, values, and behaviors shared by all involved in the education of doctors and medical students. Future research is needed to explore and, where possible, achieve consensus on the core skills, values, and behaviors of an excellent medical educator. In addition, work should commence to define and categorize the various stages in the development of a significant management portfolio in medical education teaching and research.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19638788     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ace633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  8 in total

1.  Scholarly activity in the next accreditation system: moving from structure and process to outcomes.

Authors:  Ingrid Philibert; Mary Lieh-Lai; Rebecca Miller; John R Potts; Timothy Brigham; Thomas J Nasca
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-12

2.  Determining the Drivers of Academic Success in Surgery: An Analysis of 3,850 Faculty.

Authors:  Nakul P Valsangkar; Teresa A Zimmers; Bradford J Kim; Casi Blanton; Mugdha M Joshi; Teresa M Bell; Attila Nakeeb; Gary L Dunnington; Leonidas G Koniaris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Faculty development programs improve the quality of Multiple Choice Questions items' writing.

Authors:  Hamza Mohammad Abdulghani; Farah Ahmad; Mohammad Irshad; Mahmoud Salah Khalil; Ghadeer Khalid Al-Shaikh; Sadiqa Syed; Abdulmajeed Abdurrahman Aldrees; Norah Alrowais; Shafiul Haque
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Exploring the tensions of being and becoming a medical educator.

Authors:  Ahsan Sethi; Rola Ajjawi; Sean McAleer; Susie Schofield
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Creating a medical education enterprise: leveling the playing fields of medical education vs. medical science research within core missions.

Authors:  Satid Thammasitboon; B Lee Ligon; Geeta Singhal; Gordon E Schutze; Teri L Turner
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2017

6.  A needs assessment for faculty development at two medical colleges of Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi.

Authors:  Nusrat Shah; Afifa Tabassum; Nighat Shah
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

7.  Setting Agenda for Medical Education Research in Pakistan.

Authors:  Sarah Ali; Ahsan Sethi
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.088

8.  Motivations of assessment item writers in medical programs: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sowmiya Karthikeyan; Elizabeth O'Connor; Wendy Hu
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.