Literature DB >> 19638578

Prolonged cell cycle response of HeLa cells to low-level alkylation exposure.

Allen G Schroering1, Anbarasi Kothandapani, Steve M Patrick, Saravanan Kaliyaperumal, Vishal P Sharma, Kandace J Williams.   

Abstract

Alkylation chemotherapy has been a long-standing treatment protocol for human neoplasia. N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) is a direct-acting monofunctional alkylator. Temozolomide is a clinical chemotherapeutic equivalent requiring metabolic breakdown to the alkylating agent. Both chemicals have similar mechanistic efficacy against DNA mismatch repair-proficient tumor cells that lack expression of methylguanine methyltransferase. Clinically relevant concentrations of both agents affect replicating cells only after the first cell cycle. This phenomenon has been attributed to replication fork arrest at unrepaired O(6)-methyldeoxyguanine lesions mispaired with thymine during the first replication cycle. Here, we show, by several different approaches, that MNNG-treated tumor cells do not arrest within the second cell cycle. Instead, the population slowly traverses through mitosis without cytokinesis into a third cell cycle. The peak of both ssDNA and dsDNA breaks occurs at the height of the long mitotic phase. The majority of the population emerges from mitosis as multinucleated cells that subsequently undergo cell death. However, a very small proportion of cells, <1:45,000, survive to form new colonies. Taken together, these results indicate that multinucleation within the third cell cycle, rather than replication fork arrest within the second cell cycle, is the primary trigger for cell death. Importantly, multinucleation and cell death are consistently avoided by a small percentage of the population that continues to divide. This information should prove clinically relevant for the future design of enhanced cancer chemotherapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19638578      PMCID: PMC2737279          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  38 in total

1.  Mismatch repair deficient human cells: spontaneous and MNNG-induced mutational spectra in the HPRT gene.

Authors:  A Tomita-Mitchell; A G Kat; L A Marcelino; X C Li-Sucholeiki; J Goodluck-Griffith; W G Thilly
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2000-05-30       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 2.  The multifaceted mismatch-repair system.

Authors:  Josef Jiricny
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  The cell cycle and DNA mismatch repair.

Authors:  Allen G Schroering; Michael A Edelbrock; Timothy J Richards; Kandace J Williams
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 3.905

Review 4.  Repair of alkylated DNA: recent advances.

Authors:  Barbara Sedgwick; Paul A Bates; Johanna Paik; Susan C Jacobs; Tomas Lindahl
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2006-11-16

5.  ATR kinase activation mediated by MutSalpha and MutLalpha in response to cytotoxic O6-methylguanine adducts.

Authors:  Ken-ichi Yoshioka; Yoshiko Yoshioka; Peggy Hsieh
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  A single cycle of treatment with temozolomide, alone or combined with O(6)-benzylguanine, induces strong chemoresistance in melanoma cell clones in vitro: role of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase and the mismatch repair system.

Authors:  Ester Alvino; Daniele Castiglia; Simona Caporali; Rita Pepponi; Patrizia Caporaso; Pedro Miguel Lacal; Giancarlo Marra; Franziska Fischer; Giovanna Zambruno; Enzo Bonmassar; Joseph Jiricny; Stefania D'Atri
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.650

7.  Mismatch repair-dependent processing of methylation damage gives rise to persistent single-stranded gaps in newly replicated DNA.

Authors:  Nina Mojas; Massimo Lopes; Josef Jiricny
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Rapid induction of chromatin-associated DNA mismatch repair proteins after MNNG treatment.

Authors:  Allen G Schroering; Kandace J Williams
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-05-12

9.  Phosphohistone H3 labelling for histoprognostic grading of breast adenocarcinomas and computer-assisted determination of mitotic index.

Authors:  C Bossard; A Jarry; C Colombeix; K Bach-Ngohou; A Moreau; D Loussouarn; J-F Mosnier; C L Laboisse
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Mismatch repair-dependent iterative excision at irreparable O6-methylguanine lesions in human nuclear extracts.

Authors:  Sally J York; Paul Modrich
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  10 in total

1.  Phosphorylated hMSH6: DNA mismatch versus DNA damage recognition.

Authors:  Saravanan Kaliyaperumal; Steve M Patrick; Kandace J Williams
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  The homologous recombination protein RAD51D mediates the processing of 6-thioguanine lesions downstream of mismatch repair.

Authors:  Preeti Rajesh; Alexandra V Litvinchuk; Douglas L Pittman; Michael D Wyatt
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 3.  Multifaceted roles of alkyltransferase and related proteins in DNA repair, DNA damage, resistance to chemotherapy, and research tools.

Authors:  Anthony E Pegg
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Nuclear reorganization of DNA mismatch repair proteins in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Adam S Mastrocola; Christopher D Heinen
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-12-08

Review 5.  Structural, molecular and cellular functions of MSH2 and MSH6 during DNA mismatch repair, damage signaling and other noncanonical activities.

Authors:  Michael A Edelbrock; Saravanan Kaliyaperumal; Kandace J Williams
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Major differences between tumor and normal human cell fates after exposure to chemotherapeutic monofunctional alkylator.

Authors:  Maithili Gupte; Andrew N Tuck; Vishal P Sharma; Kandace J Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  HOXA10 is associated with temozolomide resistance through regulation of the homologous recombinant DNA repair pathway in glioblastoma cell lines.

Authors:  Jin Wook Kim; Ji Young Kim; Ja Eun Kim; Seung-Ki Kim; Hyun-Tai Chung; Chul-Kee Park
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2014-05

8.  Dose-dependent spatiotemporal responses of mammalian cells to an alkylating agent.

Authors:  Ann Rancourt; Sachiko Sato; Masahiko S Satoh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Complex DNA repair pathways as possible therapeutic targets to overcome temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Koji Yoshimoto; Masahiro Mizoguchi; Nobuhiro Hata; Hideki Murata; Ryusuke Hatae; Toshiyuki Amano; Akira Nakamizo; Tomio Sasaki
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Spontaneous production of immunoglobulin M in human epithelial cancer cells.

Authors:  Fanlei Hu; Li Zhang; Jie Zheng; Ling Zhao; Jing Huang; Wenwei Shao; Qinyuan Liao; Teng Ma; Li Geng; C Cameron Yin; Xiaoyan Qiu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.