Brigid M Lynch1, Neville Owen, Anna L Hawkes, Joanne F Aitken. 1. Cancer Prevention Research Centre, School of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, 4006 Brisbane, Australia. b.lynch@sph.uq.edu.au
Abstract
PURPOSE: Promoting physical activity among cancer survivors is a high priority. Understanding barriers to physical activity provides an evidence base to inform relevant strategies for doing so. METHODS: Telephone interviews were conducted with colorectal cancer survivors at 5 (n = 538) and 12 months post-diagnosis (n = 403). We used an ecological model of health behaviour to classify participants' perceived barriers to physical activity into four sub-categories: physical environment, social environment, personal attributes, and disease-specific barriers. RESULTS: Disease-specific barriers were perceived as the greatest challenge to colorectal cancer survivors being more physically active, closely followed by personal attributes. The physical environment presented the least salient perceived barriers; however, the physical environment was most closely associated with achieving sufficient levels of physical activity at 5 months post-diagnosis. The difficulties most frequently reported by participants at both time points were belief that they were already active enough, not feeling well enough to be physically active, and experiencing fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest potential points for intervention to influence physical activity among colorectal cancer survivors.
PURPOSE: Promoting physical activity among cancer survivors is a high priority. Understanding barriers to physical activity provides an evidence base to inform relevant strategies for doing so. METHODS: Telephone interviews were conducted with colorectal cancer survivors at 5 (n = 538) and 12 months post-diagnosis (n = 403). We used an ecological model of health behaviour to classify participants' perceived barriers to physical activity into four sub-categories: physical environment, social environment, personal attributes, and disease-specific barriers. RESULTS: Disease-specific barriers were perceived as the greatest challenge to colorectal cancer survivors being more physically active, closely followed by personal attributes. The physical environment presented the least salient perceived barriers; however, the physical environment was most closely associated with achieving sufficient levels of physical activity at 5 months post-diagnosis. The difficulties most frequently reported by participants at both time points were belief that they were already active enough, not feeling well enough to be physically active, and experiencing fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest potential points for intervention to influence physical activity among colorectal cancer survivors.
Authors: Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Denise Heseltine; Donna Niedzwiecki; Donna Hollis; Leonard B Saltz; Robert J Mayer; James Thomas; Heidi Nelson; Renaud Whittom; Alexander Hantel; Richard L Schilsky; Charles S Fuchs Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-07-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kerry S Courneya; Christine M Friedenreich; H Arthur Quinney; Anthony L A Fields; Lee W Jones; Jeffrey K H Vallance; Adrian S Fairey Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2005-04
Authors: Roanne J Segal; Robert D Reid; Kerry S Courneya; Shawn C Malone; Matthew B Parliament; Chris G Scott; Peter M Venner; H Arthur Quinney; Lee W Jones; Monika E Slovinec D'Angelo; George A Wells Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Linda Trinh; Kristian Larsen; Guy E Faulkner; Ronald C Plotnikoff; Ryan E Rhodes; Scott North; Kerry S Courneya Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2015-06-06 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Scarlett Lin Gomez; Salma Shariff-Marco; Mindy DeRouen; Theresa H M Keegan; Irene H Yen; Mahasin Mujahid; William A Satariano; Sally L Glaser Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Erin L McGowan; Daniel Fuller; Nicoleta Cutumisu; Scott North; Kerry S Courneya Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-06-27 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Lawson Eng; Dan Pringle; Jie Su; XiaoWei Shen; Mary Mahler; Chongya Niu; Rebecca Charow; Kyoko Tiessen; Christine Lam; Oleksandr Halytskyy; Hiten Naik; Henrique Hon; Margaret Irwin; Vivien Pat; Christina Gonos; Catherine Chan; Jodie Villeneuve; Luke Harland; Ravi M Shani; M Catherine Brown; Peter Selby; Doris Howell; Wei Xu; Geoffrey Liu; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Jennifer M Jones Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Allison J Ottenbacher; R Sue Day; Wendell C Taylor; Shreela V Sharma; Richard Sloane; Denise C Snyder; William E Kraus; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2011-05-20 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Julienne E Bower; Kate Bak; Ann Berger; William Breitbart; Carmelita P Escalante; Patricia A Ganz; Hester Hill Schnipper; Christina Lacchetti; Jennifer A Ligibel; Gary H Lyman; Mohammed S Ogaily; William F Pirl; Paul B Jacobsen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-04-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Robert S Krouse; Christopher S Wendel; David O Garcia; Marcia Grant; Larissa K F Temple; Scott B Going; Mark C Hornbrook; Joanna E Bulkley; Carmit K McMullen; Lisa J Herrinton Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2017-07-04 Impact factor: 4.147