INTRODUCTION: Despite proven benefits of regular physical activity, estimates indicate that few cancer survivors meet physical activity guidelines. The purpose of this paper is to identify and compare exercise barriers among cancer survivors, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally as they undergo home-based behavioral interventions. METHODS: Data on a sample of 452 breast and prostate cancer survivors who completed the FRESH START trial were analyzed collectively, as well as separately by cancer type. RESULTS: More total barriers (3.5 vs. 2.4; p < 0.01) were reported among breast cancer survivors compared with prostate cancer survivors. Commonly reported baseline exercise barriers among both groups were "too busy" (breast, 52% and prostate, 45%) and "no willpower" (breast, 51% and prostate, 44%). At baseline, breast cancer survivors who reported "no willpower" also reported 18.7 fewer minutes of physical activity compared with those not reporting this barrier (p < 0.01). Among prostate cancer survivors, this difference was 39.5 min (p < 0.01). Change in barriers was not associated with change in minutes of physical activity from baseline to post-intervention in either cancer survivor group. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study evaluating barriers and physical activity over time among cancer survivors. There are similarities and differences that both need to be taken into consideration when promoting physical activity among subgroups of survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Knowledge concerning barriers associated with reported physical activity may be helpful in designing optimally targeted physical activity interventions among breast and prostate cancer survivors.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Despite proven benefits of regular physical activity, estimates indicate that few cancer survivors meet physical activity guidelines. The purpose of this paper is to identify and compare exercise barriers among cancer survivors, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally as they undergo home-based behavioral interventions. METHODS: Data on a sample of 452 breast and prostate cancer survivors who completed the FRESH START trial were analyzed collectively, as well as separately by cancer type. RESULTS: More total barriers (3.5 vs. 2.4; p < 0.01) were reported among breast cancer survivors compared with prostate cancer survivors. Commonly reported baseline exercise barriers among both groups were "too busy" (breast, 52% and prostate, 45%) and "no willpower" (breast, 51% and prostate, 44%). At baseline, breast cancer survivors who reported "no willpower" also reported 18.7 fewer minutes of physical activity compared with those not reporting this barrier (p < 0.01). Among prostate cancer survivors, this difference was 39.5 min (p < 0.01). Change in barriers was not associated with change in minutes of physical activity from baseline to post-intervention in either cancer survivor group. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study evaluating barriers and physical activity over time among cancer survivors. There are similarities and differences that both need to be taken into consideration when promoting physical activity among subgroups of survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Knowledge concerning barriers associated with reported physical activity may be helpful in designing optimally targeted physical activity interventions among breast and prostate cancer survivors.
Authors: J O Prochaska; W F Velicer; J S Rossi; M G Goldstein; B H Marcus; W Rakowski; C Fiore; L L Harlow; C A Redding; D Rosenbloom Journal: Health Psychol Date: 1994-01 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Bernardine M Pinto; Georita M Frierson; Carolyn Rabin; Joseph J Trunzo; Bess H Marcus Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-05-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kerry S Courneya; Christine M Friedenreich; H Arthur Quinney; Anthony L A Fields; Lee W Jones; Jeffrey K H Vallance; Adrian S Fairey Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2005-04
Authors: Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Elizabeth C Clipp; Colleen McBride; David F Lobach; Isaac Lipkus; Bercedis Peterson; Denise Clutter Snyder; Richard Sloane; Jennifer Arbanas; William E Kraus Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Roanne J Segal; Robert D Reid; Kerry S Courneya; Shawn C Malone; Matthew B Parliament; Chris G Scott; Peter M Venner; H Arthur Quinney; Lee W Jones; Monika E Slovinec D'Angelo; George A Wells Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Carol A Mancuso; Wendy Sayles; Laura Robbins; Erica G Phillips; Karima Ravenell; Christine Duffy; Suzanne Wenderoth; Mary E Charlson Journal: J Asthma Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 2.515
Authors: D Santa Mina; D Au; J Brunet; J Jones; G Tomlinson; N Taback; D Field; A Berlingeri; H Bradley; D Howell Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2017-10-25 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Emily E Ventura; Patricia A Ganz; Julienne E Bower; Liana Abascal; Laura Petersen; Annette L Stanton; Catherine M Crespi Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Dong Hoon Lee; Ji Young Kim; Mi Kyung Lee; Choae Lee; Ji-Hee Min; Duck Hyoun Jeong; Ji-Won Lee; Sang Hui Chu; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Jennifer Ligibel; Lee W Jones; Nam Kyu Kim; Justin Y Jeon Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Vanessa J Thomas; Catherine Seet-Lee; Michael Marthick; Birinder S Cheema; Michael Boyer; Kate M Edwards Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 3.603