Literature DB >> 19636031

Yield of diagnostic tests in evaluating syncopal episodes in older patients.

Mallika L Mendu1, Gail McAvay, Rachel Lampert, Jonathan Stoehr, Mary E Tinetti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Syncopal episodes are common among older adults; etiologies range from benign to life threatening. We determined the frequency, yield, and costs of tests obtained to evaluate older persons with syncope. We also calculated the cost per test yield and determined whether the San Francisco syncope rule (SFSR) improved test yield.
METHODS: Review of 2106 consecutive patients 65 years or older admitted following a syncopal episode.
RESULTS: Electrocardiograms (in 99% of admissions), telemetry (in 95%), cardiac enzyme tests (in 95%), and head computed tomographic (CT) scans (in 63%) were the most frequently obtained tests. Results from cardiac enzymes tests, CT scans, echocardiography, carotid ultrasonography, and electroencephalography all affected diagnosis or management in less than 5% of cases and helped determine the etiology of syncope less than 2% of the time. Postural blood pressure (BP) recording, performed in only 38% of episodes, had the highest yield with respect to affecting diagnosis (18%-26%) or management (25%-30%) and determining etiology of the syncopal episode (15%-21%). The cost per test affecting diagnosis or management was highest for electroencephalography ($32 973), CT scans ($24 881), and cardiac enzymes test ($22 397) and lowest for postural BP recording ($17-$20). The yields and costs for cardiac tests were better among patients meeting, vs those not meeting, the SFSR. For example, the cost per cardiac enzymes test affecting diagnosis or management was $10 331 in those meeting, vs $111 518 in those not meeting, the SFSR.
CONCLUSIONS: Many unnecessary tests are obtained to evaluate syncope. Selecting tests based on history and examination and prioritizing less expensive and higher yield tests would ensure a more informed and cost-effective approach to evaluating older patients with syncope.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19636031      PMCID: PMC3752785          DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  39 in total

1.  Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope.

Authors:  M Brignole; P Alboni; D Benditt; L Bergfeldt; J J Blanc; P E Bloch Thomsen; J G van Dijk; A Fitzpatrick; S Hohnloser; J Janousek; W Kapoor; R A Kenny; P Kulakowski; A Moya; A Raviele; R Sutton; G Theodorakis; W Wieling
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Derivation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with short-term serious outcomes.

Authors:  James V Quinn; Ian G Stiell; Daniel A McDermott; Karen L Sellers; Michael A Kohn; George A Wells
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 3.  Current evaluation and management of syncope.

Authors:  Wishwa N Kapoor
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-09-24       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Extending the P4P agenda, part 2: how Medicare can reduce waste and improve the care of the chronically ill.

Authors:  John E Wennberg; Elliott S Fisher; Jonathan S Skinner; Kristen K Bronner
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 5.  Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, pure autonomic failure and multiple system atrophy.

Authors:  H Kaufmann
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.435

6.  A new management of syncope: prospective systematic guideline-based evaluation of patients referred urgently to general hospitals.

Authors:  Michele Brignole; Carlo Menozzi; Angelo Bartoletti; Franco Giada; Alfonso Lagi; Andrea Ungar; Irene Ponassi; Chiara Mussi; Roberto Maggi; Giuseppe Re; Raffaello Furlan; Gianni Rovelli; Patrizia Ponzi; Alessandro Scivales
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Failure to validate the San Francisco Syncope Rule in an independent emergency department population.

Authors:  Adrienne Birnbaum; David Esses; Polly Bijur; Andrew Wollowitz; E John Gallagher
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Does the use of a syncope diagnostic protocol improve the investigation and management of syncope?

Authors:  D J Farwell; A N Sulke
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  The value of cardiac enzymes in elderly patients presenting to the emergency department with syncope.

Authors:  Shamai A Grossman; Sara Van Epp; Ryan Arnold; Richard Moore; Lily Lee; Nathan I Shapiro; Richard E Wolfe; Lewis A Lipsitz
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.053

10.  Chart reviews in emergency medicine research: Where are the methods?

Authors:  E H Gilbert; S R Lowenstein; J Koziol-McLain; D C Barta; J Steiner
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.721

View more
  32 in total

1.  Falls in the elderly: spectrum and prevention.

Authors:  Tareef Al-Aama
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  A 62-year-old woman with syncope.

Authors:  Christine Soong; Benjamin H Chen; Brian M Wong
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  [Diagnostics and treatment of syncope].

Authors:  Peter Dovjak
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 4.  San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict short-term serious outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ramon T Saccilotto; Christian H Nickel; Heiner C Bucher; Ewout W Steyerberg; Roland Bingisser; Michael T Koller
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  ECG Predictors of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Older Adults With Syncope.

Authors:  Daniel K Nishijima; Amber L Lin; Robert E Weiss; Annick N Yagapen; Susan E Malveau; David H Adler; Aveh Bastani; Christopher W Baugh; Jeffrey M Caterino; Carol L Clark; Deborah B Diercks; Judd E Hollander; Bret A Nicks; Manish N Shah; Kirk A Stiffler; Alan B Storrow; Scott T Wilber; Benjamin C Sun
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 6.  2016 Update on Medical Overuse: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Daniel J Morgan; Sanket S Dhruva; Scott M Wright; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Prevalence, associations, and risk factors for orthostatic hypotension in medical, surgical, and trauma inpatients: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Ar Kar Aung; Susan J Corcoran; Vathy Nagalingam; Eldho Paul; Harvey H Newnham
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2012

8.  Transvenous stimulation of the renal sympathetic nerves increases systemic blood pressure: a potential new treatment option for neurocardiogenic syncope.

Authors:  Malini Madhavan; Christopher V Desimone; Elisa Ebrille; Siva K Mulpuru; Susan B Mikell; Susan B Johnson; Scott H Suddendorf; Dorothy J Ladewig; Emily J Gilles; Andrew J Danielsen; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-07-28

9.  Substance abuse in emergency department patients with unexplained syncope.

Authors:  Zev Wiener; David Te-Wei Chiu; Nathan Ivan Shapiro; Shamai Aron Grossman
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.397

10.  Randomized clinical trial of an emergency department observation syncope protocol versus routine inpatient admission.

Authors:  Benjamin C Sun; Heather McCreath; Li-Jung Liang; Stephen Bohan; Christopher Baugh; Luna Ragsdale; Sean O Henderson; Carol Clark; Aveh Bastani; Emmett Keeler; Ruopeng An; Carol M Mangione
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.721

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.