Literature DB >> 16272210

A new management of syncope: prospective systematic guideline-based evaluation of patients referred urgently to general hospitals.

Michele Brignole1, Carlo Menozzi, Angelo Bartoletti, Franco Giada, Alfonso Lagi, Andrea Ungar, Irene Ponassi, Chiara Mussi, Roberto Maggi, Giuseppe Re, Raffaello Furlan, Gianni Rovelli, Patrizia Ponzi, Alessandro Scivales.   

Abstract

AIMS: The guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) define the current standard for the management of syncope, but are still incompletely applied in the clinical setting. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Prospective systematic evaluation, on strict adherence to the guidelines, of consecutive patients referred for syncope to the emergency departments of 11 general hospitals. In order to maximize the application, a decision-making guideline-based software was used and trained core medical personnel were designated-both locally in each hospital and centrally-to verify adherence to the diagnostic pathway and give advice on its correction. A diagnostic work-up consistent with the guidelines was completed in 465/541 patients (86%). A definite diagnosis was established in 98% (unexplained in 2%): neurally mediated syncope accounted for 66% of diagnosis, orthostatic hypotension 10%, primary arrhythmias 11%, structural cardiac or cardiopulmonary disease 5%, and non-syncopal attacks 6%, respectively. The initial evaluation (consisting of history, physical examination, and standard electrocardiogram) established a diagnosis in 50% of cases. Hospitalization for the management of syncope was appropriate in 25% and was required for other reasons in a further 13% of cases. The median in-hospital stay was 5.5 days (interquartile range, 3-9). Apart from the initial evaluation, a mean of 1.9+/-1.1 appropriate tests per patient was performed in 193 patients and led to a final diagnosis in 182 of these (94%).
CONCLUSION: The results of this study assess the current standard for the management of syncope on the basis of a rigorous adherence to guidelines of the ESC and provide a frame of reference for daily activity when dealing with syncope.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16272210     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  48 in total

1.  ISHNE/EHRA expert consensus on remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs).

Authors:  Sergio Dubner; Angelo Auricchio; Jonathan S Steinberg; Panos Vardas; Peter Stone; Josep Brugada; Ryszard Piotrowicz; David L Hayes; Paulus Kirchhof; Günter Breithardt; Wojciech Zareba; Claudio Schuger; Mehmet K Aktas; Michal Chudzik; Suneet Mittal; Niraj Varma
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 2.  Diagnosis and treatment of syncope.

Authors:  Michele Brignole
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Current concepts in the evaluation and management of syncope.

Authors:  Vikas Kuriachan; Robert S Sheldon
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009).

Authors:  Angel Moya; Richard Sutton; Fabrizio Ammirati; Jean-Jacques Blanc; Michele Brignole; Johannes B Dahm; Jean-Claude Deharo; Jacek Gajek; Knut Gjesdal; Andrew Krahn; Martial Massin; Mauro Pepi; Thomas Pezawas; Ricardo Ruiz Granell; Francois Sarasin; Andrea Ungar; J Gert van Dijk; Edmond P Walma; Wouter Wieling
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  [A patient with syncope].

Authors:  Helene Höhler
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  2009-10-15

6.  2015 heart rhythm society expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of postural tachycardia syndrome, inappropriate sinus tachycardia, and vasovagal syncope.

Authors:  Robert S Sheldon; Blair P Grubb; Brian Olshansky; Win-Kuang Shen; Hugh Calkins; Michele Brignole; Satish R Raj; Andrew D Krahn; Carlos A Morillo; Julian M Stewart; Richard Sutton; Paola Sandroni; Karen J Friday; Denise Tessariol Hachul; Mitchell I Cohen; Dennis H Lau; Kenneth A Mayuga; Jeffrey P Moak; Roopinder K Sandhu; Khalil Kanjwal
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 7.  San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict short-term serious outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ramon T Saccilotto; Christian H Nickel; Heiner C Bucher; Ewout W Steyerberg; Roland Bingisser; Michael T Koller
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Permanent cardiac pacing for neurocardiogenic syncope.

Authors:  J H Ruiter; M Barrett
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Evaluation of the current prognostic role of cardiogenic syncope.

Authors:  Filippo Numeroso; Gianluigi Mossini; Giuseppe Lippi; Gianfranco Cervellin
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.397

10.  A dedicated investigation unit improves management of syncopal attacks (Syncope Study of Unselected Population in Malmo--SYSTEMA I).

Authors:  Artur Fedorowski; Philippe Burri; Steen Juul-Möller; Olle Melander
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 5.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.