Literature DB >> 19636018

Comparison of power between randomized discontinuation design and upfront randomization design on progression-free survival.

Pingfu Fu1, Afshin Dowlati, Mark Schluchter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Enrichment based on molecular characteristics has emerged as an important inclusion criterion in phase II trials of targeted anticancer agents. In this study, we evaluate a well-described method of population enrichment by tumor growth characteristics in the early development stage of targeted cytostatic agents.
METHODS: For some solid tumors, such as pancreatic carcinoma, using a time-to-event end point (eg, time to disease progression) to evaluate the efficacy of a cytostatic agent in a phase II trial is more relevant than clinical response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. In this setting, we compared the power of the randomized discontinuation and upfront randomization designs under two previously proposed tumor growth models for treatment effect when the end point is time-to-event.
RESULTS: By selecting patients with more homogeneous tumor growth characteristics, the randomized discontinuation design is more efficient than the upfront randomization design when treatment benefit is restricted to slow-growing tumors. Under a model where only a subset of patients expressing the molecular target are sensitive to the agent, the randomized discontinuation design is more powerful than the upfront randomization design when the treatment effect is small; and vice versa when the treatment effect is moderate to large.
CONCLUSION: For selected targeted agents where a bioassay to select patients expressing the specific molecular target is not available, the randomized discontinuation design is a feasible alternative patient enrichment strategy in certain disease settings and provides a reasonable platform to evaluate drugs before phase III testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19636018      PMCID: PMC2734425          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  20 in total

1.  Application of a new multinomial phase II stopping rule using response and early progression.

Authors:  S Dent; B Zee; J Dancey; A Hanauske; J Wanders; E Eisenhauer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Richard Wooster; Barbara L Weber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Comparing the power of the discontinuation design to that of the classic randomized design on time-to-event endpoints.

Authors:  William B Capra
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2004-04

4.  Phase II studies of modern drugs directed against new targets: if you are fazed, too, then resist RECIST.

Authors:  Mark J Ratain; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Threats to the validity of clinical trials employing enrichment strategies for sample selection.

Authors:  P D Leber; C S Davis
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1998-04

6.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-03

7.  Randomized discontinuation trials: utility and efficiency.

Authors:  J A Kopec; M Abrahamowicz; J M Esdaile
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Randomized discontinuation design: application to cytostatic antineoplastic agents.

Authors:  Gary L Rosner; Walter Stadler; Mark J Ratain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Evaluation of randomized discontinuation design.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Richard Simon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-06-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Review of phase II trial designs used in studies of molecular targeted agents: outcomes and predictors of success in phase III.

Authors:  Robert H El-Maraghi; Elizabeth A Eisenhauer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  3 in total

1.  A phase II study of sorafenib in advanced uterine carcinoma/carcinosarcoma: a trial of the Chicago, PMH, and California Phase II Consortia.

Authors:  Halla S Nimeiri; Amit M Oza; Robert J Morgan; Dezheng Huo; Laurie Elit; James A Knost; James L Wade; Edem Agamah; Everett E Vokes; Gini F Fleming
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Bayesian enrichment strategies for randomized discontinuation trials.

Authors:  Lorenzo Trippa; Gary L Rosner; Peter Müller
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Estimation of Progression-Free Survival for All Treated Patients in the Randomized Discontinuation Trial Design.

Authors:  Theodore G Karrison; Mark J Ratain; Walter M Stadler; Gary L Rosner
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 8.710

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.