Literature DB >> 15983399

Evaluation of randomized discontinuation design.

Boris Freidlin1, Richard Simon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Single-arm phase II trials may not be appropriate for testing cytostatic agents. We evaluate two kinds of randomized designs for the early development of target-based cytostatic agents.
METHODS: We compared power of the randomized discontinuation and upfront randomization designs under two models for the treatment effect of targeted cytostatic agents.
RESULTS: The randomized discontinuation design is not as efficient as upfront randomization if treatment has a fixed effect on tumor growth rate or if treatment benefit is restricted to slower-growing tumors. On the other hand, the randomized discontinuation design can be advantageous under a model where only a subset of patients, those expressing the molecular target, is sensitive to the agent. To achieve efficiency, the design parameters must be carefully structured to provide adequate enrichment of the randomly assigned patients.
CONCLUSION: With careful planning, the randomized discontinuation designs can be useful in some settings in the early development of targeted agents where a reliable assay to select patients expressing the target is not available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15983399     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  17 in total

1.  Run-in phase III trial design with pharmacodynamics predictive biomarkers.

Authors:  Fangxin Hong; Richard Simon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Enriched enrollment: definition and effects of enrichment and dose in trials of pregabalin and gabapentin in neuropathic pain. A systematic review.

Authors:  Sebastian Straube; Sheena Derry; Henry J McQuay; R Andrew Moore
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Adaptive clinical trial designs in oncology.

Authors:  Yong Zang; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12

4.  Bayesian enrichment strategies for randomized discontinuation trials.

Authors:  Lorenzo Trippa; Gary L Rosner; Peter Müller
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Drug development in oncology: classical cytotoxics and molecularly targeted agents.

Authors:  Shivaani Kummar; Martin Gutierrez; James H Doroshow; Anthony J Murgo
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Randomized phase II designs.

Authors:  Larry Rubinstein; John Crowley; Percy Ivy; Michael Leblanc; Dan Sargent
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Next generation oncology drug development: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Martin E Gutierrez; Shivaani Kummar; Giuseppe Giaccone
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Comparison of power between randomized discontinuation design and upfront randomization design on progression-free survival.

Authors:  Pingfu Fu; Afshin Dowlati; Mark Schluchter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Suggested response criteria for phase II antitumor drug studies for neurofibromatosis type 2 related vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Scott R Plotkin; Chris Halpin; Jaishri O Blakeley; William H Slattery; D Bradley Welling; Susan M Chang; Jay S Loeffler; Gordon J Harris; A Gregory Sorensen; Michael J McKenna; Fred G Barker
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Estimation of Progression-Free Survival for All Treated Patients in the Randomized Discontinuation Trial Design.

Authors:  Theodore G Karrison; Mark J Ratain; Walter M Stadler; Gary L Rosner
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 8.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.