Literature DB >> 19635963

Efficacy of high doses of daptomycin versus alternative therapies against experimental foreign-body infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

O Murillo1, C Garrigós, M E Pachón, G Euba, R Verdaguer, C Cabellos, J Cabo, F Gudiol, J Ariza.   

Abstract

Since the currently approved dose of daptomycin (6 mg/kg of body weight/day) has been associated with clinical failures and resistance development, higher doses for some difficult-to-treat infections are being proposed. We studied the efficacy of daptomycin at high doses (equivalent to 10 mg/kg/day in humans) and compared it to that of reference and alternative treatments in a model of foreign-body infection with methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. In vitro studies were conducted with bacteria in the log and stationary phases. For the in vivo model, therapy with daptomycin at 100 mg/kg/day, vancomycin at 50 mg/kg/12 h, rifampin (rifampicin) at 25 mg/kg/12 h, or linezolid at 35 mg/kg/12 h was administered for 7 days. Antibiotic efficacy was evaluated using either bacteria from tissue cage fluids or those attached to coverslips. We screened for the emergence of linezolid- and rifampin-resistant strains and analyzed the surviving population from the daptomycin-treated group. Only daptomycin was bactericidal in both the log- and stationary-phase studies. Daptomycin (decrease in the log number of CFU per milliliter of tissue cage fluid, 2.57) and rifampin (decrease, 2.6 log CFU/ml) were better (P < 0.05) than vancomycin (decrease, 1.1 log CFU/ml) and linezolid (decrease, 0.9 log CFU/ml) in the animal model. Rifampin-resistant strains appeared in 60% of cases, whereas no linezolid resistance emerged. No daptomycin-resistant subpopulations were detected at frequencies of 10(-7) or higher. In conclusion, daptomycin at high doses proved to be as effective as rifampin, and the two were the most active therapies for this experimental foreign-body infection. These high doses ensured a profile of safety from the development of resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19635963      PMCID: PMC2764164          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00208-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  36 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus in human skin blister fluid.

Authors:  A Trampuz; M Wenk; Z Rajacic; W Zimmerli
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Prosthetic-joint infections.

Authors:  Werner Zimmerli; Andrej Trampuz; Peter E Ochsner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Characterization of an isogenic set of methicillin-resistant and susceptible mutants of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  B Berger-Bächi; A Strässle; F H Kayser
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Comparison of levofloxacin, alatrofloxacin, and vancomycin for prophylaxis and treatment of experimental foreign-body-associated infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Pierre Vaudaux; Patrice Francois; Carmelo Bisognano; Jacques Schrenzel; Daniel P Lew
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Linezolid in vitro: mechanism and antibacterial spectrum.

Authors:  David M Livermore
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Correlation between in vivo and in vitro efficacy of antimicrobial agents against foreign body infections.

Authors:  A F Widmer; R Frei; Z Rajacic; W Zimmerli
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Comparative efficacy of daptomycin and vancomycin in the therapy of experimental foreign body infection due to Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Pierre Vaudaux; Patrice Francois; Carmelo Bisognano; Dongmei Li; Daniel P Lew; Jacques Schrenzel
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  The safety and efficacy of daptomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections.

Authors:  Robert D Arbeit; Dennis Maki; Francis P Tally; Edward Campanaro; Barry I Eisenstein
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  In vivo pharmacodynamic activity of daptomycin.

Authors:  Nasia Safdar; David Andes; W A Craig
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Daptomycin in bone and joint infections: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Dennis A K Rice; Luke Mendez-Vigo
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  18 in total

1.  Efficacy of usual and high doses of daptomycin in combination with rifampin versus alternative therapies in experimental foreign-body infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  C Garrigós; O Murillo; G Euba; R Verdaguer; F Tubau; C Cabellos; J Cabo; J Ariza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Comparative efficacies of cloxacillin-daptomycin and the standard cloxacillin-rifampin therapies against an experimental foreign-body infection by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Cristina El Haj; Oscar Murillo; Alba Ribera; Mireia Vivas; Dolors Garcia-Somoza; Fe Tubau; Javier Cabo; Javier Ariza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Relationship of in vitro synergy and treatment outcome with daptomycin plus rifampin in patients with invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  Warren E Rose; Andrew D Berti; Jacob B Hatch; Dennis G Maki
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Biofilm-related infections: bridging the gap between clinical management and fundamental aspects of recalcitrance toward antibiotics.

Authors:  David Lebeaux; Jean-Marc Ghigo; Christophe Beloin
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 11.056

5.  In vitro activity of daptomycin, linezolid and rifampicin on Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms.

Authors:  Bruna Leite; Fernanda Gomes; Pilar Teixeira; Clovis Souza; Elisabeth Pizzolitto; Rosário Oliveira
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 2.188

6.  Adjunctive rifampin is crucial to optimizing daptomycin efficacy against rabbit prosthetic joint infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Azzam Saleh-Mghir; Claudette Muller-Serieys; Aurélien Dinh; Laurent Massias; Anne-Claude Crémieux
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  In Vivo Effects of Cefazolin, Daptomycin, and Nafcillin in Experimental Endocarditis with a Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Strain Showing an Inoculum Effect against Cefazolin.

Authors:  Esteban C Nannini; Kavindra V Singh; Cesar A Arias; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Tedizolid as Step-Down Therapy following Daptomycin versus Continuation of Daptomycin against Enterococci and Methicillin- and Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Rat Endocarditis Model.

Authors:  Kavindra V Singh; Cesar A Arias; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Efficacy of fosfomycin and its combination with linezolid, vancomycin and imipenem in an experimental peritonitis model caused by a Staphylococcus aureus strain with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin.

Authors:  M E Pachón-Ibáñez; S Ribes; M A Domínguez; R Fernández; F Tubau; J Ariza; F Gudiol; C Cabellos
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Factors associated with rifampin resistance in staphylococcal periprosthetic joint infections (PJI): a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Y Achermann; K Eigenmann; B Ledergerber; L Derksen; P Rafeiner; M Clauss; R Nüesch; C Zellweger; M Vogt; W Zimmerli
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.