Literature DB >> 21825285

Adjunctive rifampin is crucial to optimizing daptomycin efficacy against rabbit prosthetic joint infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Azzam Saleh-Mghir1, Claudette Muller-Serieys, Aurélien Dinh, Laurent Massias, Anne-Claude Crémieux.   

Abstract

Daptomycin is an attractive option for treating prosthetic joint infection, but the 6-mg/kg of body weight/day dose was linked to clinical failure and emergence of resistance. Using a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) knee prosthesis infection in rabbits, we studied the efficacies of high-dose daptomycin (22 mg/kg given intravenously [i.v.] once daily [o.d.]; equivalent to 8 mg/kg/day in humans) or vancomycin (60 mg/kg given intramuscularly [i.m.] twice daily [b.i.d.]), both either alone or with adjunctive rifampin (10 mg/kg i.m. b.i.d.). After partial knee replacement with a silicone implant, 10(7) MRSA CFU was injected into the knees. Treatment started 7 days postinoculation and lasted 7 days. Positive cultures were screened for the emergence of mutant strains, defined as having 3-fold-increased MICs. Although in vivo mean log(10) CFU/g of daptomycin-treated (4.23 ± 1.44; n = 12) or vancomycin-treated (4.63 ± 1.08; n = 12) crushed bone was significantly lower than that of controls (5.93 ± 1.15; n = 9) (P < 0.01), neither treatment sterilized bone (2/12 and 0/12 rabbits with sterile bone, respectively). Daptomycin mutant strains were found in 6/12, 3/12, and 2/9 daptomycin-treated, vancomycin-treated, and control rabbits, respectively; no resistant strains emerged (MIC was always <1 mg/liter). Adjunctive rifampin with daptomycin (1.47 ± 0.04 CFU/g of bone [detection threshold]; 11/11 sterile bones) or vancomycin (1.5 ± 0.12 CFU/g of bone; 6/8 sterile bones) was significantly more effective than monotherapy (P < 0.01) and prevented the emergence of daptomycin mutant strains. In this MRSA joint prosthesis infection model, combining rifampin with daptomycin was highly effective. Daptomycin mutant strains were isolated in vivo even without treatment, but adjunctive rifampin prevented this phenomenon, previously found after monotherapy in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21825285      PMCID: PMC3186998          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00675-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  22 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of infections associated with surgical implants.

Authors:  Rabih O Darouiche
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A new model of experimental prosthetic joint infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a microbiologic, histopathologic, and magnetic resonance imaging characterization.

Authors:  N Belmatoug; A C Crémieux; R Bleton; A Volk; A Saleh-Mghir; M Grossin; L Garry; C Carbon
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 3.  Prosthetic-joint infections.

Authors:  Werner Zimmerli; Andrej Trampuz; Peter E Ochsner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Experimental models of bone and prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  A C Crémieux; C Carbon
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Efficacy of sparfloxacin and autoradiographic diffusion pattern of [14C]Sparfloxacin in experimental Staphylococcus aureus joint prosthesis infection.

Authors:  A C Crémieux; A S Mghir; R Bleton; M Manteau; N Belmatoug; L Massias; L Garry; N Sales; B Mazière; C Carbon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Emergence of daptomycin resistance following vancomycin-unresponsive Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in a daptomycin-naïve patient--a review of the literature.

Authors:  S J van Hal; D L Paterson; I B Gosbell
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Combination of quinupristin-dalfopristin (Synercid) and rifampin is highly synergistic in experimental Staphylococcus aureus joint prosthesis infection.

Authors:  Azzam Saleh-Mghir; Nourdine Ameur; Claudette Muller-Serieys; Farid Ismael; Françoise Lemaitre; Laurent Massias; Céline Feger; Rémy Bléton; Anne-Claude Crémieux
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Efficacy of teicoplanin and autoradiographic diffusion pattern of [14C]teicoplanin in experimental Staphylococcus aureus infection of joint prostheses.

Authors:  A Saleh Mghir; A C Crémieux; R Bleton; F Ismael; M Manteau; S Dautrey; L Massias; L Garry; N Sales; B Mazière; C Carbon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Comparative efficacy of daptomycin and vancomycin in the therapy of experimental foreign body infection due to Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Pierre Vaudaux; Patrice Francois; Carmelo Bisognano; Dongmei Li; Daniel P Lew; Jacques Schrenzel
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  The safety and efficacy of daptomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections.

Authors:  Robert D Arbeit; Dennis Maki; Francis P Tally; Edward Campanaro; Barry I Eisenstein
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 9.079

View more
  37 in total

1.  Should daptomycin-rifampin combinations for MSSA/MRSA isolates be avoided because of antagonism?

Authors:  C Stein; O Makarewicz; C Forstner; S Weis; S Hagel; B Löffler; M W Pletz
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 2.  Rifamycins, Alone and in Combination.

Authors:  David M Rothstein
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 3.  Propionibacterium acnes: from commensal to opportunistic biofilm-associated implant pathogen.

Authors:  Yvonne Achermann; Ellie J C Goldstein; Tom Coenye; Mark E Shirtliff
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 4.  Intracellular Pharmacokinetics of Antibacterials and Their Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Federico Pea
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Relationship of in vitro synergy and treatment outcome with daptomycin plus rifampin in patients with invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  Warren E Rose; Andrew D Berti; Jacob B Hatch; Dennis G Maki
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Altering the proclivity towards daptomycin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus using combinations with other antibiotics.

Authors:  Andrew D Berti; Justine E Wergin; Gary G Girdaukas; Scott J Hetzel; George Sakoulas; Warren E Rose
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Avoiding the perfect storm: the biologic and clinical case for reevaluating the 7-day expectation for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia before switching therapy.

Authors:  Ravina Kullar; James A McKinnell; George Sakoulas
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  3D Bioprinted Scaffolds Containing Viable Macrophages and Antibiotics Promote Clearance of Staphylococcus aureus Craniotomy-Associated Biofilm Infection.

Authors:  Amy Aldrich; Mitchell A Kuss; Bin Duan; Tammy Kielian
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 9.  Role of Rifampin against Staphylococcal Biofilm Infections In Vitro, in Animal Models, and in Orthopedic-Device-Related Infections.

Authors:  Werner Zimmerli; Parham Sendi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Mechanisms of daptomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: role of the cell membrane and cell wall.

Authors:  Arnold S Bayer; Tanja Schneider; Hans-Georg Sahl
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.