Literature DB >> 19635935

Chromosome aberrations resulting from double-strand DNA breaks at a naturally occurring yeast fragile site composed of inverted ty elements are independent of Mre11p and Sae2p.

Anne M Casper1, Patricia W Greenwell, Wei Tang, Thomas D Petes.   

Abstract

Genetic instability at palindromes and spaced inverted repeats (IRs) leads to chromosome rearrangements. Perfect palindromes and IRs with short spacers can extrude as cruciforms or fold into hairpins on the lagging strand during replication. Cruciform resolution produces double-strand breaks (DSBs) with hairpin-capped ends, and Mre11p and Sae2p are required to cleave the hairpin tips to facilitate homologous recombination. Fragile site 2 (FS2) is a naturally occurring IR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae composed of a pair of Ty1 elements separated by approximately 280 bp. Our results suggest that FS2 forms a hairpin, rather than a cruciform, during replication in cells with low levels of DNA polymerase. Cleavage of this hairpin results in a recombinogenic DSB. We show that DSB formation at FS2 does not require Mre11p, Sae2p, Rad1p, Slx4p, Pso2p, Exo1p, Mus81p, Yen1p, or Rad27p. Also, repair of DSBs by homologous recombination is efficient in mre11 and sae2 mutants. Homologous recombination is impaired at FS2 in rad52 mutants and most aberrations reflect either joining of two broken chromosomes in a "half crossover" or telomere capping of the break. In support of hairpin formation precipitating DSBs at FS2, two telomere-capped deletions had a breakpoint near the center of the IR. In summary, Mre11p and Sae2p are not required for DSB formation at FS2 or the subsequent repair of these DSBs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19635935      PMCID: PMC2766307          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.109.106385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  59 in total

Review 1.  Palindromes and genomic stress fractures: bracing and repairing the damage.

Authors:  Susanna M Lewis; Atina G Coté
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2006-06-30

Review 2.  Break-induced replication: what is it and what is it for?

Authors:  Bertrand Llorente; Catherine E Smith; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Local DNA sequence control of deletion formation in Escherichia coli plasmid pBR322.

Authors:  U DasGupta; K Weston-Hafer; D E Berg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Effect of base composition at the center of inverted repeated DNA sequences on cruciform transitions in DNA.

Authors:  G X Zheng; R R Sinden
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1988-04-15       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  F Pâques; J E Haber
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.056

6.  Chromosomal translocations in yeast induced by low levels of DNA polymerase a model for chromosome fragile sites.

Authors:  Francene J Lemoine; Natasha P Degtyareva; Kirill Lobachev; Thomas D Petes
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 11.056

8.  Rad52-independent mitotic gene conversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae frequently results in chromosomal loss.

Authors:  J E Haber; M Hearn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Alteration of N-terminal phosphoesterase signature motifs inactivates Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11.

Authors:  D A Bressan; H A Olivares; B E Nelms; J H Petrini
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Mutations in POL1 increase the mitotic instability of tandem inverted repeats in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  B Ruskin; G R Fink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  17 in total

1.  The Ty1 LTR-retrotransposon of budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M Joan Curcio; Sheila Lutz; Pascale Lesage
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2015-04-01

Review 2.  Pathways and Mechanisms that Prevent Genome Instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Christopher D Putnam; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genome rearrangements caused by depletion of essential DNA replication proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Edith Cheng; Jessica A Vaisica; Jiongwen Ou; Anastasia Baryshnikova; Yong Lu; Frederick P Roth; Grant W Brown
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Remarkably Long-Tract Gene Conversion Induced by Fragile Site Instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Shahana A Chumki; Mikael K Dunn; Thomas F Coates; Jeanmarie D Mishler; Ellen M Younkin; Anne M Casper
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Mechanism of replicative DNA polymerase delta pausing and a potential role for DNA polymerase kappa in common fragile site replication.

Authors:  Erin Walsh; Xiaoxiao Wang; Marietta Y Lee; Kristin A Eckert
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  A genetic and structural study of genome rearrangements mediated by high copy repeat Ty1 elements.

Authors:  Jason E Chan; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Replication stress-induced chromosome breakage is correlated with replication fork progression and is preceded by single-stranded DNA formation.

Authors:  Wenyi Feng; Sara C Di Rienzi; M K Raghuraman; Bonita J Brewer
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Meiotic recombination initiation in and around retrotransposable elements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Mariko Sasaki; Sam E Tischfield; Megan van Overbeek; Scott Keeney
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Fragile site instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae causes loss of heterozygosity by mitotic crossovers and break-induced replication.

Authors:  Danielle M Rosen; Ellen M Younkin; Shaylynn D Miller; Anne M Casper
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the green microalga Lobosphaera (Parietochloris) incisa reveals a new type of palindromic repetitive repeat.

Authors:  Nicolas J Tourasse; Nastassia Shtaida; Inna Khozin-Goldberg; Sammy Boussiba; Olivier Vallon
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.