Literature DB >> 9328889

Effects of age, speech rate, and type of test on temporal auditory processing.

N E Vaughan1, T Letowski.   

Abstract

Cognitive slowing that accompanies aging may be reflected in temporal aspects of auditory processing. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of age, type of test, and rate of speech on temporal auditory processing. Listeners were divided into three groups: young (25- to 35-year-olds), middle aged (45- to 55-year-olds), and older (65- to 75-year-olds). A method of time compression known as Synchronized Overlap Add (SOLA) was used to increase the rate of speech. This method provides a high-quality speech signal and limits the distortions that may confound the temporal effects on time-compressed tests of speech intelligibility. Listeners performed four speech understanding tasks: sentence repetition, sentence intelligibility rating, connected discourse intelligibility rating, and connected discourse comprehension question and answers at three time compression rates (60%, 70%, and 80%). Although the older group performed more poorly on all tests, only the connected discourse intelligibility rating test was sensitive to age differences among all three groups. This difference did not appear to increase with rate increases but was present only at the 70% compression rate. In addition, variability was especially high in the oldest group of participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9328889     DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4005.1192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  12 in total

1.  Recognition of synthesized vowel sequences in steady-state and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Dylan V Pearson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Time-Compressed Speech Identification Is Predicted by Auditory Neural Processing, Perceptuomotor Speed, and Executive Functioning in Younger and Older Listeners.

Authors:  James W Dias; Carolyn M McClaskey; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-19

3.  Hearing Impairment in Relation to Severity of Diabetes in a Veteran Cohort.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Kelly M Reavis; Donald Austin; Nicholas Reed; Jane Gordon; Dan McDermott; Marilyn F Dille
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Speech recognition and temporal processing in middle-aged women.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Megan Vargo
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Age effects in temporal envelope processing: speech unmasking and auditory steady state responses.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  Improving older adults' understanding of challenging speech: Auditory training, rapid adaptation and perceptual learning.

Authors:  Rebecca E Bieber; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Speech perception in older listeners with normal hearing:conditions of time alteration, selective word stress, and length of sentences.

Authors:  Soojin Cho; Jyaehyoung Yu; Hyungi Chun; Hyekyung Seo; Woojae Han
Journal:  Korean J Audiol       Date:  2014-04-14

8.  Auditory Temporal Processing and Aging: Implications for Speech Understanding of Older People.

Authors:  S Gordon-Salant; P J Fitzgibbons; G H Yeni-Komshian
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2011-03-07

9.  Effect of Repetition Rate on Speech Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response in Younger and Middle Aged Individuals.

Authors:  Anuj Kumar Neupane; Krithika Gururaj; Garvita Mehta; Sujeet Kumar Sinha
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2014-09-18

10.  The development and standardization of Self-assessment for Hearing Screening of the Elderly.

Authors:  Gibbeum Kim; Wondo Na; Gungu Kim; Woojae Han; Jinsook Kim
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.