Literature DB >> 19633355

Model-free estimation of the psychometric function.

Kamila Zychaluk1, David H Foster.   

Abstract

A subject's response to the strength of a stimulus is described by the psychometric function, from which summary measures, such as a threshold or a slope, may be derived. Traditionally, this function is estimated by fitting a parametric model to the experimental data, usually the proportion of successful trials at each stimulus level. Common models include the Gaussian and Weibull cumulative distribution functions. This approach works well if the model is correct, but it can mislead if not. In practice, the correct model is rarely known. Here, a nonparametric approach based on local linear fitting is advocated. No assumption is made about the true model underlying the data, except that the function is smooth. The critical role of the bandwidth is identified, and its optimum value is estimated by a cross-validation procedure. As a demonstration, seven vision and hearing data sets were fitted by the local linear method and by several parametric models. The local linear method frequently performed better and never worse than the parametric ones. Supplemental materials for this article can be downloaded from app.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19633355      PMCID: PMC2826188          DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.6.1414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  12 in total

1.  Fitting the psychometric function.

Authors:  B Treutwein; H Strasburger
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-01

2.  Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary.

Authors:  S A Klein
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

3.  Invariance of the psychometric function for character recognition across the visual field.

Authors:  H Strasburger
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

4.  The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

5.  Modeling psychometric functions in R.

Authors:  Rosa Yssaad-Fesselier; Kenneth Knoblauch
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2006-02

6.  Is the ability to identify deviations in multiple trajectories compromised by amblyopia?

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; Srimant P Tripathy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Asymmetric transfer of the dynamic motion aftereffect between first- and second-order cues and among different second-order cues.

Authors:  Andrew J Schofield; Timothy Ledgeway; Claire V Hutchinson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Failure to find asymmetry in auditory gap detection.

Authors:  Richard J Baker; Deanne Jayewardene; Claire Sayle; Shahad Saeed
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2008-01

9.  Contrast thresholds of the human eye.

Authors:  H R BLACKWELL
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1946-11

10.  On the visibility of radiation at the human fovea.

Authors:  W J CROZIER
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1950-09       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  23 in total

1.  Long-term music training tunes how the brain temporally binds signals from multiple senses.

Authors:  Hweeling Lee; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Adaptive bandwidth measurements of importance functions for speech intelligibility prediction.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Whitmal; Kristina DeRoy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Oscillatory phase shapes syllable perception.

Authors:  Sanne ten Oever; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Contextual influence on the tilt after-effect in foveal and para-foveal vision.

Authors:  Cheng Chen; Xianghui Chen; Min Gao; Qiong Yang; Hongmei Yan
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 5.203

5.  Rhythmicity and cross-modal temporal cues facilitate detection.

Authors:  Sanne ten Oever; Charles E Schroeder; David Poeppel; Nienke van Atteveldt; Elana Zion-Golumbic
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  A MATLAB toolbox for the efficient estimation of the psychometric function using the updated maximum-likelihood adaptive procedure.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Wei Dai; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2015-03

7.  Conjoint psychometric field estimation for bilateral audiometry.

Authors:  Dennis L Barbour; James C DiLorenzo; Kiron A Sukesan; Xinyu D Song; Jeff Y Chen; Eleanor A Degen; Katherine L Heisey; Roman Garnett
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-06

8.  Development of Neural Sensitivity to Face Identity Correlates with Perceptual Discriminability.

Authors:  Vaidehi S Natu; Michael A Barnett; Jake Hartley; Jesse Gomez; Anthony Stigliani; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Low-Frequency Cortical Oscillations Entrain to Subthreshold Rhythmic Auditory Stimuli.

Authors:  Sanne Ten Oever; Charles E Schroeder; David Poeppel; Nienke van Atteveldt; Ashesh D Mehta; Pierre Mégevand; David M Groppe; Elana Zion-Golumbic
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Action affects perception through modulation of attention.

Authors:  Wladimir Kirsch; Tim Kitzmann; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.