Elzbieta Wolny1, Robert Hasterok. 1. Department of Plant Anatomy and Cytology, University of Silesia, Jagiellonska 28, 40-032 Katowice, Poland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Brachypodium is a small genus of temperate grasses that comprises 12-15 species. Brachypodium distachyon is now well established as a model species for temperate cereals and forage grasses. In contrast to B. distachyon, other members of the genus have been poorly investigated at the chromosome level or not at all. METHODS: Twenty accessions comprising six species and two subspecies of Brachypodium were analysed cytogenetically. Measurements of nuclear genome size were made by flow cytometry. Chromosomal localization of 18-5.8-25S rDNA and 5S rDNA loci was performed by dual-colour fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on enzymatically digested root-tip meristematic cells. For comparative phylogenetic analyses genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) applied to somatic chromosome preparations was used. KEY RESULTS: All Brachypodium species examined have rather small genomes and chromosomes. Their chromosome numbers and genome sizes vary from 2n = 10 and 0.631 pg/2C in B. distachyon to 2n = 38 and 2.57 pg/2C in B. retusum, respectively. Genotypes with 18 and 28 chromosomes were found among B. pinnatum accessions. GISH analysis revealed that B. pinnatum with 28 chromosomes is most likely an interspecific hybrid between B. distachyon (2n = 10) and B. pinnatum (2n = 18). Two other species, B. phoenicoides and B. retusum, are also allopolyploids and B. distachyon or a close relative seems to be one of their putative ancestral species. In chromosomes of all species examined the 45S rDNA loci are distally distributed whereas loci for 5S rDNA are pericentromeric. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing significance of B. distachyon as a model grass emphasizes the need to understand the evolutionary relationships in the genus Brachypodium and to ensure consistency in the biological nomenclature of its species. Modern molecular cytogenetic techniques such as FISH and GISH are suitable for comparative phylogenetic analyses and may provide informative chromosome- and/or genome-specific landmarks.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Brachypodium is a small genus of temperate grasses that comprises 12-15 species. Brachypodium distachyon is now well established as a model species for temperate cereals and forage grasses. In contrast to B. distachyon, other members of the genus have been poorly investigated at the chromosome level or not at all. METHODS: Twenty accessions comprising six species and two subspecies of Brachypodium were analysed cytogenetically. Measurements of nuclear genome size were made by flow cytometry. Chromosomal localization of 18-5.8-25S rDNA and 5S rDNA loci was performed by dual-colour fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on enzymatically digested root-tip meristematic cells. For comparative phylogenetic analyses genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) applied to somatic chromosome preparations was used. KEY RESULTS: All Brachypodium species examined have rather small genomes and chromosomes. Their chromosome numbers and genome sizes vary from 2n = 10 and 0.631 pg/2C in B. distachyon to 2n = 38 and 2.57 pg/2C in B. retusum, respectively. Genotypes with 18 and 28 chromosomes were found among B. pinnatum accessions. GISH analysis revealed that B. pinnatum with 28 chromosomes is most likely an interspecific hybrid between B. distachyon (2n = 10) and B. pinnatum (2n = 18). Two other species, B. phoenicoides and B. retusum, are also allopolyploids and B. distachyon or a close relative seems to be one of their putative ancestral species. In chromosomes of all species examined the 45S rDNA loci are distally distributed whereas loci for 5S rDNA are pericentromeric. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing significance of B. distachyon as a model grass emphasizes the need to understand the evolutionary relationships in the genus Brachypodium and to ensure consistency in the biological nomenclature of its species. Modern molecular cytogenetic techniques such as FISH and GISH are suitable for comparative phylogenetic analyses and may provide informative chromosome- and/or genome-specific landmarks.
Authors: Martin A Lysak; Alexandre Berr; Ales Pecinka; Renate Schmidt; Kim McBreen; Ingo Schubert Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-03-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Robert Hasterok; Agnieszka Marasek; Iain S Donnison; Ian Armstead; Ann Thomas; Ian P King; Elzbieta Wolny; Dominika Idziak; John Draper; Glyn Jenkins Journal: Genetics Date: 2006-02-19 Impact factor: 4.562
Authors: Pilar Catalán; Jochen Müller; Robert Hasterok; Glyn Jenkins; Luis A J Mur; Tim Langdon; Alexander Betekhtin; Dorota Siwinska; Manuel Pimentel; Diana López-Alvarez Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2012-01-01 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Lu Ma; Giang T H Vu; Veit Schubert; Koichi Watanabe; Nils Stein; Andreas Houben; Ingo Schubert Journal: Chromosome Res Date: 2010-11-23 Impact factor: 5.239
Authors: Melanie Febrer; Jose Luis Goicoechea; Jonathan Wright; Neil McKenzie; Xiang Song; Jinke Lin; Kristi Collura; Marina Wissotski; Yeisoo Yu; Jetty S S Ammiraju; Elzbieta Wolny; Dominika Idziak; Alexander Betekhtin; Dave Kudrna; Robert Hasterok; Rod A Wing; Michael W Bevan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 3.240