BACKGROUND: Previous uncontrolled studies have suggested that there is late cognitive decline after coronary artery bypass grafting that may be attributable to use of the cardiopulmonary bypass pump. METHODS: In this prospective, nonrandomized, longitudinal study, we compared cognitive outcomes after on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (n = 152) with off-pump bypass surgery patients (n = 75); nonsurgical cardiac comparison subjects (n = 99); and 69 heart-healthy comparison (HHC) subjects. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline to 72 months in the following cognitive domains: verbal memory, visual memory, visuoconstruction, language, motor speed, psychomotor speed, attention, executive function, and a composite global score. RESULTS: There were no consistent differences in 72-month cognitive outcomes among the three groups with coronary artery disease (CAD). The CAD groups had lower baseline performance, and a greater degree of decline compared with HHC. The degree of change was small, with none of the groups having more than 0.5 SD decline. None of the groups was substantially worse at 72 months compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with subjects with no vascular disease risk factors, the CAD patients had lower baseline cognitive performance and greater degrees of decline over 72 months, suggesting that in these patients, vascular disease may have an impact on cognitive performance. We found no significant differences in the long-term cognitive outcomes among patients with various CAD therapies, indicating that management strategy for CAD is not an important determinant of long-term cognitive outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Previous uncontrolled studies have suggested that there is late cognitive decline after coronary artery bypass grafting that may be attributable to use of the cardiopulmonary bypass pump. METHODS: In this prospective, nonrandomized, longitudinal study, we compared cognitive outcomes after on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (n = 152) with off-pump bypass surgery patients (n = 75); nonsurgical cardiac comparison subjects (n = 99); and 69 heart-healthy comparison (HHC) subjects. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline to 72 months in the following cognitive domains: verbal memory, visual memory, visuoconstruction, language, motor speed, psychomotor speed, attention, executive function, and a composite global score. RESULTS: There were no consistent differences in 72-month cognitive outcomes among the three groups with coronary artery disease (CAD). The CAD groups had lower baseline performance, and a greater degree of decline compared with HHC. The degree of change was small, with none of the groups having more than 0.5 SD decline. None of the groups was substantially worse at 72 months compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with subjects with no vascular disease risk factors, the CAD patients had lower baseline cognitive performance and greater degrees of decline over 72 months, suggesting that in these patients, vascular disease may have an impact on cognitive performance. We found no significant differences in the long-term cognitive outcomes among patients with various CAD therapies, indicating that management strategy for CAD is not an important determinant of long-term cognitive outcomes.
Authors: M F Newman; J L Kirchner; B Phillips-Bute; V Gaver; H Grocott; R H Jones; D B Mark; J G Reves; J A Blumenthal Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-02-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A M Jette; A R Davies; P D Cleary; D R Calkins; L V Rubenstein; A Fink; J Kosecoff; R T Young; R H Brook; T L Delbanco Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 1986 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Ola A Selnes; Maura A Grega; Louis M Borowicz; Richard M Royall; Guy M McKhann; William A Baumgartner Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Charles W Hogue; Robert Fucetola; Tamara Hershey; Kenneth Freedland; Victor G Dávila-Román; Alison M Goate; Richard E Thompson Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Miles Berger; Jacob W Nadler; Jeffrey Browndyke; Niccolo Terrando; Vikram Ponnusamy; Harvey Jay Cohen; Heather E Whitson; Joseph P Mathew Journal: Anesthesiol Clin Date: 2015-07-16
Authors: Unni Dokkedal; Tom G Hansen; Lars S Rasmussen; Jonas Mengel-From; Kaare Christensen Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Ling Zheng; Wendy J Mack; Helena C Chui; Lara Heflin; Dan Mungas; Bruce Reed; Charles DeCarli; Michael W Weiner; Joel H Kramer Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-01-27 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Elizabeth L Whitlock; L Grisell Diaz-Ramirez; Alexander K Smith; W John Boscardin; Michael S Avidan; M Maria Glymour Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Sharon K Inouye; Edward R Marcantonio; Cyrus M Kosar; Douglas Tommet; Eva M Schmitt; Thomas G Travison; Jane S Saczynski; Long H Ngo; David C Alsop; Richard N Jones Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: James R Bateman; Christopher M Filley; Rini I Kaplan; Kate S Heffernan; Brianne M Bettcher Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 2.475