Literature DB >> 19630548

Bumblebees learn to forage like Bayesians.

Jay M Biernaskie1, Steven C Walker, Robert J Gegear.   

Abstract

Bayesian foraging in patchy environments requires that foragers have information about the distribution of resources among patches (prior information), either set by natural selection or learned from past experience. We test the hypothesis that bumblebee foragers can rapidly learn prior information from past experience in two very different experimental environments. In the high-variance environment (patches of low and high quality), stochastic optimality models predicted that finding rewards should sometimes sharply increase an optimal forager's tendency to stay in a patch (an incremental response), whereas in the uniform environment, finding rewards should always decrease the tendency to stay (a decremental response). We use Cox regression models to show that, in a matter of hours, bees learned to match both predicted responses, resulting in a reward intake rate that averaged 80% of the predicted maximum. Following training in either environment, bees' adaptive behavior carried over to a common test environment, thus confirming the influence of memorized prior information. Although Bayesian foraging by learning is often presumed, this study is the first to clearly isolate the adaptive use of a learned prior expectation. More generally, it highlights the remarkable adaptive plasticity of an important generalist pollinator and agent of selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19630548     DOI: 10.1086/603629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  23 in total

1.  Resource diversity and landscape-level homogeneity drive native bee foraging.

Authors:  Shalene Jha; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sure enough: efficient Bayesian learning and choice.

Authors:  Brad R Foley; Paul Marjoram
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  The evolution of signal-reward correlations in bee- and hummingbird-pollinated species of Salvia.

Authors:  Santiago Benitez-Vieyra; Juan Fornoni; Jessica Pérez-Alquicira; Karina Boege; César A Domínguez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Experience matters: context-dependent decisions explain spatial foraging patterns in the deposit-feeding crab Scopimera intermedia.

Authors:  T Y Hui; Gray A Williams
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Sampling and tracking a changing environment: persistence and reward in the foraging decisions of bumblebees.

Authors:  Aimee S Dunlap; Daniel R Papaj; Anna Dornhaus
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Pollination system and the effect of inflorescence size on fruit set in the deceptive orchid Cephalanthera falcata.

Authors:  Kenji Suetsugu; Risa S Naito; Shigeki Fukushima; Atsushi Kawakita; Makoto Kato
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.629

7.  Learning capabilities enhanced in harsh environments: a common garden approach.

Authors:  Timothy C Roth; Lara D LaDage; Vladimir V Pravosudov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Failures of perception in the low-prevalence effect: Evidence from active and passive visual search.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen C Walenchok; Stephen D Goldinger; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Exposure to multiple cholinergic pesticides impairs olfactory learning and memory in honeybees.

Authors:  Sally M Williamson; Geraldine A Wright
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Unpacking chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) patch use: Do individuals respond to food patches as predicted by the marginal value theorem?

Authors:  Lisa R O'Bryan; Susan P Lambeth; Steven J Schapiro; Michael L Wilson
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.371

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.