Literature DB >> 33118192

Unpacking chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) patch use: Do individuals respond to food patches as predicted by the marginal value theorem?

Lisa R O'Bryan1,2, Susan P Lambeth3, Steven J Schapiro3, Michael L Wilson1,4.   

Abstract

The marginal value theorem is an optimal foraging model that predicts how efficient foragers should respond to both their ecological and social environments when foraging in food patches, and it has strongly influenced hypotheses for primate behavior. Nevertheless, experimental tests of the marginal value theorem have been rare in primates and observational studies have provided conflicting support. As a step towards filling this gap, we test whether the foraging decisions of captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) adhere to the assumptions and qualitative predictions of the marginal value theorem. We presented 12 adult chimpanzees with a two-patch foraging environment consisting of both low-quality (i.e., low-food density) and high-quality (i.e., high-food density) patches and examined the effect of patch quality on their search behavior, foraging duration, marginal capture rate, and its proxy measures: giving-up density and giving-up time. Chimpanzees foraged longer in high-quality patches, as predicted. In contrast to predictions, they did not depress high-quality patches as thoroughly as low-quality patches. Furthermore, since chimpanzees searched in a manner that fell between systematic and random, their intake rates did not decline at a steady rate over time, especially in high-quality patches, violating an assumption of the marginal value theorem. Our study provides evidence that chimpanzees are sensitive to their rate of energy intake and that their foraging durations correlate with patch quality, supporting many assumptions underlying primate foraging and social behavior. However, our results question whether the marginal value theorem is a constructive model of chimpanzee foraging behavior, and we suggest a Bayesian foraging framework (i.e., combining past foraging experiences with current patch sampling information) as a potential alternative. More work is needed to build an understanding of the proximate mechanisms underlying primate foraging decisions, especially in more complex socioecological environments.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chimpanzee; gain curve; giving-up density; giving-up time; marginal value theorem

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33118192      PMCID: PMC7962466          DOI: 10.1002/ajp.23208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Primatol        ISSN: 0275-2565            Impact factor:   2.371


  21 in total

Review 1.  Feeding rate as valuable information in primate feeding ecology.

Authors:  Naofumi Nakagawa
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 2.163

2.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.

Authors:  E L Charnov
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  Bumblebees learn to forage like Bayesians.

Authors:  Jay M Biernaskie; Steven C Walker; Robert J Gegear
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  How do foragers decide when to leave a patch? A test of alternative models under natural and experimental conditions.

Authors:  Harry H Marshall; Alecia J Carter; Alexandra Ashford; J Marcus Rowcliffe; Guy Cowlishaw
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Macronutrient balancing affects patch departure by guerezas (Colobus guereza).

Authors:  Caley A Johnson; David Raubenheimer; Colin A Chapman; Kaia J Tombak; Andrea J Reid; Jessica M Rothman
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.371

6.  Testing optimal foraging theory in a penguin-krill system.

Authors:  Yuuki Y Watanabe; Motohiro Ito; Akinori Takahashi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Ecological constraints on group size in three species of neotropical primates.

Authors:  C A Chapman
Journal:  Folia Primatol (Basel)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  Patch depletion behavior differs between sympatric folivorous primates.

Authors:  Kaia J Tombak; Andrea J Reid; Colin A Chapman; Jessica M Rothman; Caley A Johnson; Rafael Reyna-Hurtado
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 2.163

9.  Dietary generalists and nutritional specialists: Feeding strategies of adult female blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis) in the Kakamega Forest, Kenya.

Authors:  Maressa Q Takahashi; Jessica M Rothman; David Raubenheimer; Marina Cords
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 2.371

10.  The social function of food-associated calls in male chimpanzees.

Authors:  Pawel Fedurek; Katie E Slocombe
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 2.371

View more
  2 in total

1.  Playbacks of food-associated calls attract chimpanzees towards known food patches in a captive setting.

Authors:  Lisa R O'Bryan; Susan P Lambeth; Steven J Schapiro; Michael L Wilson
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 2.163

2.  A Food for All Seasons: Stability of Food Preferences in Gorillas across Testing Methods and Seasons.

Authors:  Jennifer Vonk; Jordyn Truax; Molly C McGuire
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.