Literature DB >> 19630112

Clinical application of subjective global assessment in Chinese patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Bei-Wen Wu1, Tao Yin, Wei-Xin Cao, Zhi-Dong Gu, Xiao-Jin Wang, Min Yan, Bing-Ya Liu.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the role of subjective global assessment (SGA) in nutritional assessment and outcome prediction of Chinese patients with gastrointestinal cancer.
METHODS: A total of 751 patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer between August 2004 and August 2006 were enrolled in this study. Within 72 h after admission, SGA, anthropometric parameters, and laboratory tests were used to assess the nutritional status of each patient. The outcome variables including hospital stay, complications, and in-hospital medical expenditure were also obtained.
RESULTS: Based on the results of SGA, 389 (51.8%), 332 (44.2%), and 30 (4.0%) patients were classified into well nourished group (SGA-A), mildly to moderately malnourished group (SGA-B), and severely malnourished group (SGA-C), respectively. The prevalence of malnutrition classified by SGA, triceps skinfold thickness (TSF), mid-upper arm muscle circumference (MAMC), albumin (ALB), prealbumin (PA), and body mass index (BMI) was 48.2%, 39.4%, 37.7%, 31.3%, 21.7%, and 9.6%, respectively. In addition, ANOVA tests revealed significant differences in body mass index (BMI), TSF, PA, and ALB of patients in different SGA groups. The more severely malnourished the patient was, the lower the levels of BMI, TSF, PA, and ALB were (P < 0.05). Chi2 tests showed a significant difference in SGA classification between patients receiving different types of treatment (surgery vs chemotherapy/radiotherapy). As the nutritional status classified by SGA deteriorated, the patients stayed longer in hospital and their medical expenditures increased significantly. Furthermore, multiple regression analysis showed that SGA and serum ALB could help predict the medical expenditures and hospital stay of patients undergoing surgery. The occurrence of complications increased in parallel with the increasing grade of SGA, and was the highest in the SGA-C group (23.3%) and the lowest in the SGA-A group (16.8%).
CONCLUSION: SGA is a reliable assessment tool and helps to predict the hospital stay and medical expenditures of Chinese surgical gastrointestinal cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19630112      PMCID: PMC2715983          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.15.3542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  43 in total

1.  Use of subjective global assessment to identify nutrition-associated complications and death in geriatric long-term care facility residents.

Authors:  G S Sacks; K Dearman; W H Replogle; V L Cora; M Meeks; T Canada
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Nutritional status of patients with advanced cancer: the value of using the subjective global assessment of nutritional status as a screening tool.

Authors:  Lene Thoresen; Irene Fjeldstad; Knut Krogstad; Stein Kaasa; Ursula G Falkmer
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.762

3.  Malnutrition in geriatric patients: a neglected problem?

Authors:  S Elmståhl; M Persson; M Andrén; V Blabolil
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Nutritional assessment: a comparison of clinical judgement and objective measurements.

Authors:  J P Baker; A S Detsky; D E Wesson; S L Wolman; S Stewart; J Whitewell; B Langer; K N Jeejeebhoy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-04-22       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Is serum albumin a good marker for malnutrition in the physically impaired elderly?

Authors:  Masafumi Kuzuya; Sachiko Izawa; Hiromi Enoki; Kiwako Okada; Akihisa Iguchi
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 7.324

6.  ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Intensive care.

Authors:  K G Kreymann; M M Berger; N E P Deutz; M Hiesmayr; P Jolliet; G Kazandjiev; G Nitenberg; G van den Berghe; J Wernerman; C Ebner; W Hartl; C Heymann; C Spies
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 7.324

7.  ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Liver disease.

Authors:  M Plauth; E Cabré; O Riggio; M Assis-Camilo; M Pirlich; J Kondrup; P Ferenci; E Holm; S Vom Dahl; M J Müller; W Nolte
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 7.324

8.  Nutritional deterioration in cancer: the role of disease and diet.

Authors:  P Ravasco; I Monteiro-Grillo; P M Vidal; M E Camilo
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.126

Review 9.  At which body mass index and degree of weight loss should hospitalized elderly patients be considered at nutritional risk?

Authors:  A M Beck; L Ovesen
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.324

10.  Outcome of protein-energy malnutrition in elderly medical patients.

Authors:  T Cederholm; C Jägrén; K Hellström
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  12 in total

1.  Nutrition support in surgical patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yang Chen; Bao-Lin Liu; Bin Shang; Ai-Shan Chen; Shi-Qing Liu; Wei Sun; Hong-Zhuan Yin; Jian-Qiao Yin; Qi Su
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  The relationship between nutritional status and handgrip strength in adult cancer patients: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Şenay Burçin Alkan; Mehmet Artaç; Neslişah Rakıcıoğlu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Quality of life and nutritional status among cancer patients on chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nunilon Vergara; Jose Enrique Montoya; Herdee Gloriane Luna; Jose Roberto Amparo; Gloria Cristal-Luna
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2013-07

Review 4.  [Preoperative management for malnourished patients in abdominal surgery. Practical treatment regimen for reduction of perioperative morbidity].

Authors:  K Khatib-Chahidi; A Troja; M Kramer; M Klompmaker; H-R Raab; D Antolovic
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  The Determination of a Consensus Nutritional Approach for Cancer Patients in Spain Using the Delphi Methodology.

Authors:  José Pablo Suárez-Llanos; Ruth Vera-García; Jorge Contreras-Martinez
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 6.  Malnutrition: laboratory markers vs nutritional assessment.

Authors:  Shishira Bharadwaj; Shaiva Ginoya; Parul Tandon; Tushar D Gohel; John Guirguis; Hiren Vallabh; Andrea Jevenn; Ibrahim Hanouneh
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2016-05-11

7.  Parenteral nutrition including an omega-3 fatty-acid-containing lipid emulsion for intensive care patients in China: a pharmacoeconomic analysis.

Authors:  Yufei Feng; Chao Li; Tian Zhang; Lorenzo Pradelli
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2017-09-05

8.  The determinants of reduced dietary intake in hospitalised colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Anne van der Werf; Katherine Arthey; Michael Hiesmayr; Isabella Sulz; Karin Schindler; Alessandro Laviano; Jacqueline Langius; Marian de van der Schueren
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Nutritional status deteriorates as the severity of diabetic foot ulcers increases and independently associates with prognosis.

Authors:  Shan-Shan Zhang; Zheng-Yi Tang; Ping Fang; Hong-Jie Qian; Lei Xu; Guang Ning
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Factors associated with malnutrition in hospitalized cancer patients: a croos-sectional study.

Authors:  Fernanda Rafaella de Melo Silva; Mirella Gondim Ozias Aquino de Oliveira; Alex Sandro Rolland Souza; José Natal Figueroa; Carmina Silva Santos
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.