Literature DB >> 19629607

Does an arthroscopic suture bridge technique maintain repair integrity?: a serial evaluation by ultrasonography.

Jin-Young Park1, Hawa Tahir Siti, Jung-Sup Keum, Sung-Gyu Moon, Kyung-Soo Oh.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Biomechanical studies suggest a suture bridge technique enhances rotator cuff tendon footprint contact area, holding strength, and mean contact pressure. Based on these studies, we asked whether (1) the suture bridge technique would provide a high rate of cuff integrity after surgery, (2) the status of the repaired cuff would change with time, (3) preoperative factors could predict postoperative cuff integrity, and (4) patients with retears had less favorable pain, functional scores, range of motion (ROM), and muscle strength compared with those with intact repairs. We prospectively followed 78 patients with arthroscopic repairs in whom we used the suture bridge technique. The integrity of the rotator cuff repair was determined using ultrasonographic evaluation at 4.5 and 12 months after surgery. Ultrasonography revealed intact cuffs in 91% at 4.5 months postoperatively, all of which were maintained at the 12-month followup. Failure rates were 17.6% (three of 17) for massive tears, 11.1% (two of 18) for large tears, 6.3% (two of 32) for medium tears, and no failures for small tears. Preoperative fatty degeneration of the supraspinatus muscle was a strong predictor of cuff integrity. We found no correlation between the integrity and clinical outcomes except for a temporary decrease of abduction strength at 6 months. Arthroscopic repair using suture bridge technique can achieve a low retear rate in shoulders treated for rotator cuff tears, but the occurrence of retear did not influence the outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19629607      PMCID: PMC2865619          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0990-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  35 in total

1.  Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness supraspinatus tears (small-to-medium): A prospective study with 2- to 4-year follow-up.

Authors:  William F Bennett
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 2.  All-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: A long-term retrospective outcome comparison.

Authors:  Erik L Severud; Charles Ruotolo; Douglas D Abbott; Wesley M Nottage
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Mechanical strength of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Alberto G Schneeberger; Andreas von Roll; Fabian Kalberer; Hilaire A C Jacob; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Arthroscopic repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Christopher K Jones; Felix H Savoie
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Six surgery-correlated sonographic signs for rotator cuff tears: emphasis on partial-thickness tear.

Authors:  Chao-Hsuan Yen; Hong-Jen Chiou; Yi-Hong Chou; Chuang-Chuen Hsu; Jinn-Jer Wu; Hsiao-Li Ma; Cheng-Yen Chang
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.605

6.  The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Leesa M Galatz; Craig M Ball; Sharlene A Teefey; William D Middleton; Ken Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Repair site integrity after arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent suture-bridge rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Joshua B Frank; Neal S ElAttrache; Joshua S Dines; Allie Blackburn; John Crues; James E Tibone
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff: 2- to 14-year follow-up.

Authors:  Franklin Wilson; Viktor Hinov; Gayl Adams
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Arthroscopic revision of failed rotator cuff repairs: technique and results.

Authors:  Ian K Y Lo; Stephen S Burkhart
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Influence of cuff muscle fatty degeneration on anatomic and functional outcomes after simple suture of full-thickness tears.

Authors:  Daniel Goutallier; Jean-Marie Postel; Pascal Gleyze; Pierre Leguilloux; Stéphane Van Driessche
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  16 in total

1.  The effect of multiple channeling on the structural integrity of repaired rotator cuff.

Authors:  Chris Hyunchul Jo; Kang Sup Yoon; Ji Ho Lee; Seung Baik Kang; Jae Hyup Lee; Hyuk Soo Han; Seung Hwan Rhee; Ji Sun Shin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Prognostic factors influencing the outcome of rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Gianpiero Cazzato; Fabrizio Donati; Pietro Randelli; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Clinical outcomes and structural integrity of arthroscopic double-row versus suture-bridge repair for rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hashiguchi; Satoshi Iwashita; Kentaro Sonoki; Kazumasa Abe; Minoru Yoneda; Shinro Takai
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-17

4.  In vivo blood flow after rotator cuff reconstruction in a sheep model: comparison of single versus double row.

Authors:  Dennis Liem; Nicolas J Dedy; Gregor Hauschild; Georg Gosheger; Shirin Meier; Maurice Balke; Hans-Ulrich Spiegel; Bjoern Marquardt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  A Systematic Review of Preoperative Fatty Infiltration and Rotator Cuff Outcomes.

Authors:  M Michael Khair; Jason Lehman; Nicholas Tsouris; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-09-25

6.  Influence of patient and diagnostic parameters on reported retear rates after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Andreas M Müller; Matthias Flury; Hasan N Alsayed; Laurent Audigé
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Clinical and structural evaluation of arthroscopic double-row suture-bridge rotator cuff repair: early results of a novel technique.

Authors:  H El-Azab; S Buchmann; K Beitzel; S Waldt; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Arthroscopic management of massive rotator cuff tears: an evaluation of debridement, complete, and partial repair with and without force couple restoration.

Authors:  Philipp R Heuberer; Roman Kölblinger; Stefan Buchleitner; Leo Pauzenberger; Brenda Laky; Alexander Auffarth; Philipp Moroder; Sylvia Salem; Bernhard Kriegleder; Werner Anderl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Primary arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears results in significant improvements with low rate of re-tear.

Authors:  Ahmed Haleem; Chetan Gohal; Timothy Leroux; Patrick Henry; Bashar Alolabi; Moin Khan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Defining massive rotator cuff tears: a Delphi consensus study.

Authors:  Adam Schumaier; David Kovacevic; Christopher Schmidt; Andrew Green; Andrew Rokito; Charles Jobin; Ed Yian; Frances Cuomo; Jason Koh; Mohit Gilotra; Miguel Ramirez; Matthew Williams; Robert Burks; Rodney Stanley; Samer Hasan; Scott Paxton; Syed Hasan; Wesley Nottage; William Levine; Uma Srikumaran; Brian Grawe
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.019

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.