Literature DB >> 19627956

Inter-rater reliability of three musculoskeletal physical examination techniques used to assess motion in three planes while standing.

Heidi Prather1, Devyani Hunt, Karen Steger-May, Marcie Harris Hayes, Evan Knaus, John Clohisy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to measure the reliability between examiners of 3 basic maneuvers of the Total Body Functional Profile physical examination test. The hypothesis was musculoskeletal health care providers of different disciplines could reliably use the 3 basic maneuvers as part of the musculoskeletal physical examination.
DESIGN: A prospective observational study was conducted. Twenty-eight adult volunteers were measured on both the left and right side by 2 independent raters on a single occasion.
SETTING: The subjects were recruited through advertisements placed by the orthopedic department at a tertiary university. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight volunteers were recruited and completed the study. The volunteers were between the ages of 18 and 51 years of age, had no symptoms in the lower extremity or spine, had no previous history of surgery or tumor involving the lower extremity, and no medical conditions that would preclude participation.
METHODS: On a single occasion, 2 examiners per 1 volunteer were blinded to their own and each others' measurements. Each examiner assessed the distance of frontal and sagittal plane lunge and angle of motion for transverse plane testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Inter-rater agreement is expressed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The difference between raters is reported with 95% CIs. Baseline demographics, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), and Harris hip questionnaires were completed by all participants.
RESULTS: The UCLA and Harris hip scores showed no significant activity restrictions or pain limitations in all participants. The inter-rater reliability for sagittal, frontal, and transverse plane matrix testing was good with ICCs of 0.86 (95% CI 0.77-0.91), 0.90 (95% CI 0.84-0.94), and 0.85 (95% CI 0.75-0.91), respectively. The rater reliability between disciplines for transverse, sagittal, and frontal plane matrix testing was good with ICCs of 0.89 (95% CI 0.80-0.94), 0.88 (95% CI 0.79-0.94), and 0.90 (95% CI 0.81-0.95), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The inter-rater reliability for 3 basic maneuvers of the Total Body Functional Profile is good among musculoskeletal health care providers of different disciplines. These 3 maneuvers may be used consistently as part of the musculoskeletal physical examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19627956      PMCID: PMC3433850          DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PM R        ISSN: 1934-1482            Impact factor:   2.298


  12 in total

1.  Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance.

Authors:  P W Duncan; D K Weiner; J Chandler; S Studenski
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1990-11

2.  Variability in hip range of motion on clinical examination.

Authors:  Christophe J Chevillotte; Mir H Ali; Robert T Trousdale; Mark W Pagnano
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 3.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies.

Authors:  S D Walter; M Eliasziw; A Donner
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  H C Amstutz; B J Thomas; R Jinnah; W Kim; T Grogan; C Yale
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument.

Authors:  K O Berg; S L Wood-Dauphinee; J I Williams; B Maki
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug

9.  Balance in elderly patients: the "get-up and go" test.

Authors:  S Mathias; U S Nayak; B Isaacs
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons.

Authors:  D Podsiadlo; S Richardson
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  3 in total

1.  Reliability and agreement of hip range of motion and provocative physical examination tests in asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  Heidi Prather; Marcie Harris-Hayes; Devyani M Hunt; Karen Steger-May; Vinta Mathew; John C Clohisy
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.298

2.  Impact of prone, supine and oblique patient positioning on CBCT image quality, contrast-to-noise ratio and figure of merit value in the maxillofacial region.

Authors:  Juha Koivisto; Maureen van Eijnatten; Jorma Järnstedt; Kirsi Holli-Helenius; Prasun Dastidar; Jan Wolff
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Simplifying the upper limb peripheral motor screen: Proposing the "K" sign.

Authors:  A P Kurmis; T P Kurmis
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.476

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.