Literature DB >> 18639435

Variability in hip range of motion on clinical examination.

Christophe J Chevillotte1, Mir H Ali, Robert T Trousdale, Mark W Pagnano.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of physical examination in determining hip range of motion. Twenty normal hips, 21 hips with osteoarthritis, and 21 hips of patients more than 12 months after a total hip arthroplasty were examined for visual passive range of motion. These 62 hips were examined by 2 experienced surgeons and by 3 trainees. The 2 experienced examiners repeated their clinical examinations in 19 patients to determine the intraobserver reliability. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicated moderate interobserver agreement in estimates of clinical hip motion (ICC for hip flexion, 0.56 +/- 0.12; for hip abduction, 0.48 +/- 0.13). Intraclass correlation coefficients also suggest only moderate intraobserver reliability in measurements of hip motion (ICC for hip flexion, 0.62 +/- 0.14; hip abduction, 0.44 +/- 0.20). More reliable and accurate methods are needed to measure clinical hip motion before and after total hip arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18639435     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  6 in total

1.  What is the impingement-free range of motion of the asymptomatic hip in young adult males?

Authors:  Brian Larkin; Marnix van Holsbeeck; Denise Koueiter; Ira Zaltz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  No clinical difference between large metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and 28-mm-head total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Wierd P Zijlstra; Inge van den Akker-Scheek; Mark J M Zee; Jos J A M van Raay
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Validity and test-retest reliability of manual goniometers for measuring passive hip range of motion in femoroacetabular impingement patients.

Authors:  Silvio Nussbaumer; Michael Leunig; Julia F Glatthorn; Simone Stauffacher; Hans Gerber; Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Inter-rater reliability of three musculoskeletal physical examination techniques used to assess motion in three planes while standing.

Authors:  Heidi Prather; Devyani Hunt; Karen Steger-May; Marcie Harris Hayes; Evan Knaus; John Clohisy
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Discrepancy in the Responsiveness to Hip Range of Motion Between Harris and Oxford Hip Scores.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Kawai; Koji Goto; Yutaka Kuroda; Yaichiro Okuzu; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-01-20

6.  Is digital photography an accurate and precise method for measuring range of motion of the hip and knee?

Authors:  Russell R Russo; Matthew B Burn; Sabir K Ismaily; Brayden J Gerrie; Shuyang Han; Jerry Alexander; Christopher Lenherr; Philip C Noble; Joshua D Harris; Patrick C McCulloch
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2017-09-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.