Literature DB >> 3810866

Psychologic effects and esthetic results of breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

A Filiberti, M Tamburini, L Murru, G F Lovo, V Ventafridda, N Arioli, A Grisotti.   

Abstract

A survey was conducted on 84 patients who chose to have breast reconstruction after mastectomy. A self-rating questionnaire was sent to each patient by mail to collect as much information about the patient as possible: individual status, reasons for requesting breast reconstruction, acceptance and advantages of having the new breast, satisfaction with the overall esthetic results, amount of patient information regarding breast reconstruction, and the source of this information. Once the questionnaire was completely filled out, it was returned by mail to the persons conducting this study. Fourty-three patients (51% of sample) replied with a completed questionnaire. When all the data for this survey were collected, an interesting factor emerged: 33 patients (76.7% of those who replied) reported being substantially satisfied with the esthetic results of their operation. When asked about the reasons for requesting breast reconstruction, 16 patients asserted their request was based on the desire to prove to themselves that they had overcome the disease, and 16 to improve body image. When asked about the advantages of breast reconstruction, 17 patients believed the operation would help improve inner feelings about the loss of the breast. Thus breast reconstruction is indeed an element of prime importance to mastectomized women, especially for their physical and psychological rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3810866     DOI: 10.1177/030089168607200608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumori        ISSN: 0300-8916


  7 in total

Review 1.  Management of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  A Melville; A Liberati; R Grilli; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-12

2.  Postmastectomy attitudes in women who wear external breast prostheses compared to those who have undergone breast reconstructions.

Authors:  L L Reaby; L K Hort
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1995-02

3.  Nipple-areolar complex reconstruction and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ellen S Satteson; Benjamin J Brown; Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

4.  Breast reconstructive surgery in medically underserved women with breast cancer: the role of patient-physician communication.

Authors:  Rose C Maly; Yihang Liu; Elaine Kwong; Amardeep Thind; Allison L Diamant
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Body image dissatisfaction in patients undergoing breast reconstruction: Examining the roles of breast symmetry and appearance investment.

Authors:  Irene Teo; Gregory P Reece; Sheng-Cheng Huang; Kanika Mahajan; Johnny Andon; Pujjal Khanal; Clement Sun; Krista Nicklaus; Fatima Merchant; Mia K Markey; Michelle Cororve Fingeret
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Variation in physician-patient discussion of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Judy Y Chen; Jennifer Malin; Patricia A Ganz; Clifford Ko; Diana Tisnado; May Lin Tao; Martha Timmer; John L Adams; Katherine L Kahn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical outcomes and cost of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap versus implants for breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Ankur Khajuria; Oliver J Smith; Maxim Prokopenko; Maximillian Greenfield; Afshin Mosahebi
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.