Literature DB >> 16084433

A unique method by which to quantitate synchrony with equilibrium radionuclide angiography.

J William O'Connell1, Carole Schreck, Michael Moles, Nitish Badwar, Theresa DeMarco, Jeffrey Olgin, Byron Lee, Zian Tseng, Uday Kumar, Elias H Botvinick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves symptoms and the survival rate in patients with advanced heart failure by improving synchrony. However, CRT is not always successful, is costly, and is applied without individualization. There is no specific measure of synchrony. The goal of this study was to analyze new quantitative parameters of synchrony and compare them with established measures. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Equilibrium radionuclide angiography, phase angle (Ø), and amplitude quantitate regional contraction timing and magnitude and are the basis for new synchrony (S) and entropy (E) parameters. S is the vector sum of all amplitudes based on the angular distribution of Ø divided by the scalar sum of the length of all vectors. Complete S equals 1, and its absence equals 0. E measures the disorder in the region of interest, is 1 with random contraction and 0 with full synchrony, and differentiates among differing contraction patterns. Left ventricular S and E were measured in 22 normal equilibrium radionuclide angiography studies, where regions of interest were drawn from the left ventricle, left atrium, and background to analyze model ventricles with normal wall motion (N), ventricles with aneurysm (An), ventricles with severe diffuse dysfunction (Diff), and ventricles with severe regional dysfunction (Reg). The new S and E parameters were highly reproducible and well differentiated among N, An, Diff, and Reg, which were not separated by SD Ø (SD of ventricular phase), which has gained popularity as a measure of synchrony.
CONCLUSION: Unique scintigraphic parameters for the evaluation of ventricular synchrony were derived, and their added value was determine compared with established measures. Indications for pacemaker therapy now include the treatment of severe congestive heart failure (CHF). Atrial triggered biventricular pacemakers reduce CHF symptoms and prolong life in patients with cardiomyopathy, severe CHF, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) lower than 35%, and QRS greater than 120 milliseconds. Such pacing, or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), seeks to reduce the heterogeneity and increase the synchrony of ventricular activation, conduction, and contraction. CRT has improved hemodynamics, increased exercise tolerance, reduced symptoms and the need for hospitalization, reversed ventricular remodeling, and reduced the all-cause mortality rate in CHF. However, CRT is costly, fails to improve symptoms or activity level in more than 30% of patients, and is applied blindly without individualization or consideration of lead placement sight. A variety of echocardiographic methods have sought to measure synchrony and its serial changes with CRT. A recent study presented evidence of the poor reproducibility of several widely applied echocardiographic measurements by which to determine ventricular synchrony. Magnetic resonance imaging has excellent resolution of regional wall motion and has been applied to assess ventricular synchrony and its response to pacing therapy. However, these methods are complex and are not well established or widely available, and magnetic resonance imaging has not been widely applied after pacing. An accurate and reproducible method is needed by which to objectively measure regional ventricular synchrony. Phase image analysis, a functional method based on the first Fourier harmonic fit of the gated blood pool time versus radioactivity curve, generates the parameters of amplitude (A), which parallels the extent of regional ventricular contraction or stroke volume, and phase angle (Ø), which represents the timing of regional contraction. It was applied early with demonstrated reproducibility to show the linkage between electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony and to characterize the contraction pattern in heart failure and its alteration with CRT. The SD of ventricular Ø, applied as a marker of synchrony, has been shown to demonstrate the beneficial effects of biventricular pacing, and its strong prognostic value has been shown in patients with congestive cardiomyopathy and CHF, superior to LVEF. The SD Ø may not be optimal for synchrony evaluation. We sought improved, more sensitive parameters to better differentiate synchrony among the spectrum of possible patterns of dyssynergy. We derived, initially evaluated, and here present new synchrony (S) and entropy (E) parameters, based on the phase method, to quantitate regional and global ventricular synchrony and applied them in simulation and clinical protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16084433     DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2005.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  25 in total

1.  Biventricular pacing in severe heart failure patients reverses electromechanical dyssynchronization from apex to base.

Authors:  J F Toussaint; T Lavergne; J Ollitraut; C Hignette; J M Darondel; B De Dieuleveult; M Froissart; J Y Le Heuzey; L Guize; M Paillard
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure before pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  Jeroen J Bax; Thomas H Marwick; Sander G Molhoek; Gabe B Bleeker; Lieselot van Erven; Eric Boersma; Paul Steendijk; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  William T Abraham; Westby G Fisher; Andrew L Smith; David B Delurgio; Angel R Leon; Evan Loh; Dusan Z Kocovic; Milton Packer; Alfredo L Clavell; David L Hayes; Myrvin Ellestad; Robin J Trupp; Jackie Underwood; Faith Pickering; Cindy Truex; Peggy McAtee; John Messenger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-06-13       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Ventricular coupling of electrical and mechanical dyssynchronization in heart failure patients.

Authors:  Jean-François Toussaint; Thomas Lavergne; Khaldoun Kerrou; Barbara de Dieuleveult; Felizardo Ponce; Marc Froissart; Jean-Yves Le Heuzey; Louis Guize; Michel Paillard
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.976

5.  New method for evaluating left ventricular wall motion by color-coded tissue Doppler imaging: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  K Miyatake; M Yamagishi; N Tanaka; M Uematsu; N Yamazaki; Y Mine; A Sano; M Hirama
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  Retiming the failing heart: principles and current clinical status of cardiac resynchronization.

Authors:  Christophe Leclercq; David A Kass
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-01-16       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  The CARE-HF study (CArdiac REsynchronisation in Heart Failure study): rationale, design and end-points.

Authors:  J G Cleland; J C Daubert; E Erdmann; N Freemantle; D Gras; L Kappenberger; W Klein; L Tavazzi
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 15.534

8.  Use of left ventricular pacing in heart failure: evaluation by gated blood pool imaging.

Authors:  C Le Rest; O Couturier; A Turzo; P Guillo; Y Bizais; Y Etienne; J J Blanc; J Narula
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Phase image characterization of ventricular contraction in left and right bundle branch block.

Authors:  M A Frais; E H Botvinick; D W Shosa; W J O'Connell; M M Scheinman; R S Hattner; F Morady
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Augmented preexcitation assessed by scintigraphic phase analysis during atrial pacing.

Authors:  E Botvinick; N Schechtmann; M Dae; M Scheinman; J Davis; J Herre; T Iskikian; J Abbott
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.749

View more
  34 in total

1.  Cardiac dyssynchrony: we have the tools. It is time to use them.

Authors:  Steven Port
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  SPECT blood pool phase analysis can accurately and reproducibly quantify mechanical dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Michel Lalonde; David Birnie; Terrence D Ruddy; Robert A deKemp; Richard W Wassenaar
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Ventricular asynchrony: A shift to the right?

Authors:  Andrew Van Tosh; Kenneth J Nichols
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Comparison of left ventricular contraction homogeneity index using SPECT gated blood pool imaging and planar phase analysis.

Authors:  François Harel; Vincent Finnerty; Jean Grégoire; Bernard Thibault; Paul Khairy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Timing is everything.

Authors:  Steven C Port
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Optimization and validation of radionuclide angiography phase analysis parameters for quantification of mechanical dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Richard Wassenaar; David O'Connor; Barbora Dej; Terrence David Ruddy; David Birnie
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Normal limits of gated blood pool SPECT count-based regional cardiac function parameters.

Authors:  Kenneth J Nichols; Andrew Van Tosh; Pieter De Bondt; Steven R Bergmann; Christopher J Palestro; Nathaniel Reichek
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Role of cardiac MRI and nuclear imaging in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Niti R Aggarwal; Matthew W Martinez; Bernard J Gersh; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 9.  Nonechocardiographic imaging in evaluation for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Wael AlJaroudi; Ji Chen; Wael A Jaber; Steven G Lloyd; Manuel D Cerqueira; Thomas Marwick
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.792

10.  Imaging synchrony.

Authors:  Elias H Botvinick; J William O'Connell; Nitish Badhwar
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.