GOALS OF WORK: This study aims to describe a pilot study of the feasibility, acceptability and likely impact of a nurse-delivered, telephone intervention to reduce unmet need and improve quality of life for surgical patients with colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CONNECT intervention comprises five standardised calls over 6 months commencing on day 3 post-discharge. A prospective non-randomised control trial with patients who had surgery for colorectal cancer at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney between July and December 2006 was conducted. Patients completed a telephone interview with an independent researcher at 1, 3 and 6 months to assess study outcomes, including unmet need (Supportive Care Needs Survey), psychological distress and quality of life (FACT-C). Patients' views of the intervention were ascertained. MAIN RESULTS: Forty-one patients participated, 20 in the intervention period. Intervention calls were successfully completed with 85% or more of patients at each of the five time points. Mean call duration ranged from 14-19 min with the highest number of needs (27 for 20 patients) identified on day 3. Patients indicated that the timing of the calls was appropriate and the majority (85%) felt the number of calls was sufficient. There were promising trends in outcomes. For both patient groups, there were clinically meaningful improvements in FACT-C scores over time, with a larger improvement in the intervention group (20.4 points) than the control group (11.7). CONCLUSIONS: The CONNECT intervention was found to be feasible and acceptable to patients. A larger randomised trial is underway to establish its effectiveness to improve patient outcomes.
GOALS OF WORK: This study aims to describe a pilot study of the feasibility, acceptability and likely impact of a nurse-delivered, telephone intervention to reduce unmet need and improve quality of life for surgical patients with colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CONNECT intervention comprises five standardised calls over 6 months commencing on day 3 post-discharge. A prospective non-randomised control trial with patients who had surgery for colorectal cancer at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney between July and December 2006 was conducted. Patients completed a telephone interview with an independent researcher at 1, 3 and 6 months to assess study outcomes, including unmet need (Supportive Care Needs Survey), psychological distress and quality of life (FACT-C). Patients' views of the intervention were ascertained. MAIN RESULTS: Forty-one patients participated, 20 in the intervention period. Intervention calls were successfully completed with 85% or more of patients at each of the five time points. Mean call duration ranged from 14-19 min with the highest number of needs (27 for 20 patients) identified on day 3. Patients indicated that the timing of the calls was appropriate and the majority (85%) felt the number of calls was sufficient. There were promising trends in outcomes. For both patient groups, there were clinically meaningful improvements in FACT-C scores over time, with a larger improvement in the intervention group (20.4 points) than the control group (11.7). CONCLUSIONS: The CONNECT intervention was found to be feasible and acceptable to patients. A larger randomised trial is underway to establish its effectiveness to improve patient outcomes.
Authors: Michelle L Macvean; Victoria M White; Sarah Pratt; Suzanne Grogan; Robert Sanson-Fisher Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2006-09-01 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Corrie A M Marijnen; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Hein Putter; Mandy van den Brink; Cornelis P Maas; Hendrik Martijn; Harm J Rutten; Theo Wiggers; Elma Klein Kranenbarg; Jan-Willem H Leer; Anne M Stiggelbout Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-03-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: James D Harrison; Jane M Young; Melanie A Price; Phyllis N Butow; Michael J Solomon Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-03-25 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Jean A McDougall; Cindy K Blair; Charles L Wiggins; Michael B Goodwin; Vi K Chiu; Ashwani Rajput; Anita Y Kinney Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-05-20 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Bojoura Schouten; Bert Avau; Geertruida Trudy E Bekkering; Patrick Vankrunkelsven; Jeroen Mebis; Johan Hellings; Ann Van Hecke Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-03-26
Authors: Markus Schuler; Stephan Richter; Gerhard Ehninger; Martin Bornhäuser; Leopold Hentschel Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 2.692