Literature DB >> 20394654

Remating in Drosophila melanogaster: are indirect benefits condition dependent?

Tristan A F Long1, Alison Pischedda, William R Rice.   

Abstract

By measuring the direct and indirect fitness costs and benefits of sexual interactions, the feasibility of alternate explanations for polyandry can be experimentally assessed. This approach becomes more complicated when the relative magnitude of the costs and/or benefits associated with multiple mating (i.e., remating with different males) vary with female condition, as this may influence the strength and direction of sexual selection. Here, using the model organism Drosophila melanogaster, we test whether the indirect benefits that a nonvirgin female gains by remating (“trading-up”) are influenced by her condition (body size). We found that remating by small-bodied, low-fecundity females resulted in the production of daughters of relatively higher fecundity, whereas the opposite pattern was observed for large-bodied females. In contrast, remating had no measurable effect on the relative reproductive success of sons from dams of either body size. These results are consistent with a hypothesis based on sexually antagonistic genetic variation. The implications of these results to our understanding of the evolution and consequences of polyandry are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20394654      PMCID: PMC2930934          DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00997.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  46 in total

Review 1.  Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits.

Authors:  M D Jennions; M Petrie
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2000-02

2.  Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  The influence of male and female body size on copulation duration and fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A Lefranc; J Bundgaard
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  The cost of mating rises nonlinearly with copulation frequency in a laboratory population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B Kuijper; A D Stewart; W R Rice
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Estimating the heritability of female lifetime fecundity in a locally adapted Drosophila melanogaster population.

Authors:  T A F Long; P M Miller; A D Stewart; W R Rice
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Adult male nutrition and reproductive success in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Claudia Fricke; Amanda Bretman; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation.

Authors:  Jonathan R Gibson; Adam K Chippindale; William R Rice
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  INFERENCE OF SPERM COMPETITION FROM BROODS OF FIELD-CAUGHT DROSOPHILA.

Authors:  Lawrence G Harshman; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection.

Authors:  Alison Pischedda; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Role of sexual selection in speciation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Akanksha Singh; Bashisth N Singh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Sexual selection has minimal impact on effective population sizes in species with high rates of random offspring mortality: An empirical demonstration using fitness distributions.

Authors:  Alison Pischedda; Urban Friberg; Andrew D Stewart; Paige M Miller; William R Rice
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Does sexual experience affect the strength of male mate choice for high-quality females in Drosophila melanogaster?

Authors:  Chelsea S Sinclair; Suriya F Lisa; Alison Pischedda
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 2.912

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.