L-C Gerhardt1, A Lenz, N D Spencer, T Münzer, S Derler. 1. Laboratory for Protection and Physiology, Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research, St. Gallen CH-9014, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: The mechanical properties of human skin are known to change with ageing, rendering skin less resistant to friction and shear forces, as well as more vulnerable to wounds. Until now, only few and contradictory results on the age-dependent friction properties of skin have been reported. This study has investigated in detail the influence of age on the friction of human skin against textiles. METHODS: In vivo skin-friction measurements on a force plate were combined with skin analyses concerning elasticity, hydration, pH value and sebum content. Thirty-two young and 28 aged persons rubbed their volar forearm in a reciprocating motion against various textiles on the force plate, using defined normal loads and sliding velocities, representing clinically relevant contact conditions. RESULTS: Mean friction coefficients ranged from 0.30 +/- 0.04 (polytetrafluoroethylene) to 0.43 +/- 0.04 (cotton/polyester). No significant differences in the friction properties of skin were found between the age groups despite skin elasticity being significantly lower in the aged persons. Skin hydration was significantly higher in the elderly, whereas no significant differences were observed in either skin pH value or sebum content. CONCLUSION: Adhesion is usually assumed to be the dominant factor in skin friction, but our observations imply that deformation is also an important factor in the friction of aged skin. In the elderly, lower skin elasticity and skin turgor are associated with more pronounced skin tissue displacements and greater shear forces during frictional contact, emphasizing the importance of friction reduction in wound-prevention programmes.
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: The mechanical properties of human skin are known to change with ageing, rendering skin less resistant to friction and shear forces, as well as more vulnerable to wounds. Until now, only few and contradictory results on the age-dependent friction properties of skin have been reported. This study has investigated in detail the influence of age on the friction of human skin against textiles. METHODS: In vivo skin-friction measurements on a force plate were combined with skin analyses concerning elasticity, hydration, pH value and sebum content. Thirty-two young and 28 aged persons rubbed their volar forearm in a reciprocating motion against various textiles on the force plate, using defined normal loads and sliding velocities, representing clinically relevant contact conditions. RESULTS: Mean friction coefficients ranged from 0.30 +/- 0.04 (polytetrafluoroethylene) to 0.43 +/- 0.04 (cotton/polyester). No significant differences in the friction properties of skin were found between the age groups despite skin elasticity being significantly lower in the aged persons. Skin hydration was significantly higher in the elderly, whereas no significant differences were observed in either skin pH value or sebum content. CONCLUSION: Adhesion is usually assumed to be the dominant factor in skin friction, but our observations imply that deformation is also an important factor in the friction of aged skin. In the elderly, lower skin elasticity and skin turgor are associated with more pronounced skin tissue displacements and greater shear forces during frictional contact, emphasizing the importance of friction reduction in wound-prevention programmes.
Authors: Ranjith Babu; Jong G Park; Ankit I Mehta; Tony Shan; Peter M Grossi; Christopher R Brown; William J Richardson; Robert E Isaacs; Carlos A Bagley; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Oren N Gottfried Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Joonoh Myoung; Eui Taek Jeong; Mina Kim; Jun Man Lim; Nae Gyu Kang; Sun Gyoo Park Journal: Skin Res Technol Date: 2021-06-03 Impact factor: 2.240
Authors: Maria F Leyva-Mendivil; Jakub Lengiewicz; Anton Page; Neil W Bressloff; Georges Limbert Journal: Tribol Lett Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 3.106
Authors: Stéphanie F Bernatchez; Golie E Mengistu; Bruce P Ekholm; Shilpi Sanghi; Steven D Theiss Journal: Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 4.730