OBJECTIVE: Recombinant human granulocyte-colony-stimulating factors such as filgrastim and pegfilgrastim have been employed as primary and secondary prophylaxis against neutropenia in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. This study was conducted to evaluate the rate of febrile neutropenia in patients with high-risk early breast cancer receiving dose-dense chemotherapy and, as primary prophylaxis, either pegfilgrastim 6 mg fixed dose on the same day as chemotherapy or filgrastim on days 2-10 of each cycle. Secondary objectives included the rate of severe neutropenia, treatment delays and dose reductions. METHODS: This was a nonrandomized matched case-control study with 214 patients receiving dose-dense chemotherapy. Each group receiving supportive therapy included 107 patients (pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups). RESULTS: Fourteen patients (13%) in the pegfilgrastim group developed febrile neutropenia as compared to 1 patient (1%) in the filgrastim group (p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences regarding the rate of severe neutropenia, treatment delays and dose reductions were observed. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that pegfilgrastim administered as primary prophylaxis on the same day as dose-dense chemotherapy is less efficacious than filgrastim administered on days 2-10 of each chemotherapy cycle. For the particular regimens given in this retrospective matched case-control study, the current recommendation for administering pegfilgrastim at least 24 h after chemotherapy completion seems justified. However, further randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify this finding. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.
OBJECTIVE: Recombinant human granulocyte-colony-stimulating factors such as filgrastim and pegfilgrastim have been employed as primary and secondary prophylaxis against neutropenia in cancerpatients receiving chemotherapy. This study was conducted to evaluate the rate of febrile neutropenia in patients with high-risk early breast cancer receiving dose-dense chemotherapy and, as primary prophylaxis, either pegfilgrastim 6 mg fixed dose on the same day as chemotherapy or filgrastim on days 2-10 of each cycle. Secondary objectives included the rate of severe neutropenia, treatment delays and dose reductions. METHODS: This was a nonrandomized matched case-control study with 214 patients receiving dose-dense chemotherapy. Each group receiving supportive therapy included 107 patients (pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups). RESULTS: Fourteen patients (13%) in the pegfilgrastim group developed febrile neutropenia as compared to 1 patient (1%) in the filgrastim group (p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences regarding the rate of severe neutropenia, treatment delays and dose reductions were observed. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that pegfilgrastim administered as primary prophylaxis on the same day as dose-dense chemotherapy is less efficacious than filgrastim administered on days 2-10 of each chemotherapy cycle. For the particular regimens given in this retrospective matched case-control study, the current recommendation for administering pegfilgrastim at least 24 h after chemotherapy completion seems justified. However, further randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify this finding. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors: Sarah Marion; Spiros Tzivelekis; Christina Darden; Mark A Price; Bintu Sherif; Jacob Garcia; James A Kaye; David Chandler Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-04-23 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Derek Weycker; Xiaoyan Li; Spiros Tzivelekis; Mark Atwood; Jacob Garcia; Yanli Li; Maureen Reiner; Gary H Lyman Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-10-12 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Georgia Kourlaba; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Dimitrios Pectasides; Dimosthenis V Skarlos; Helen Gogas; George Pentheroudakis; Angelos Koutras; George Fountzilas; Nikos Maniadakis Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Mehmet Asim Bilen; Diana H Cauley; Bradley J Atkinson; Hsiang-Chun Chen; Diana H Kaya; Xuemei Wang; Raghu Vikram; Shi-Ming Tu; Paul G Corn; Jeri Kim Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Date: 2016-12-13 Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Matteo Lambertini; Paolo Bruzzi; Francesca Poggio; Simona Pastorino; Giovanni Gardin; Matteo Clavarezza; Claudia Bighin; Paolo Pronzato; Lucia Del Mastro Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Heinz Ludwig; Pere Gascón; Carsten Bokemeyer; Matti Aapro; Mario Boccadoro; Kris Denhaerynck; Andriy Krendyukov; Karen MacDonald; Ivo Abraham Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-10-20 Impact factor: 3.603