Literature DB >> 30343410

Outcomes of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia prophylaxis with biosimilar filgrastim (Zarzio®) initiated "same-day" (< 24 h), "per-guidelines" (24-72 h), and "late" (> 72 h): findings from the MONITOR-GCSF study.

Heinz Ludwig1, Pere Gascón2, Carsten Bokemeyer3, Matti Aapro4, Mario Boccadoro5, Kris Denhaerynck6,7, Andriy Krendyukov8, Karen MacDonald6, Ivo Abraham9,10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) are indicated for prophylaxis or management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and febrile neutropenia (FN). Guidelines recommend G-CSF 24-72 h following chemotherapy; however, some evidence suggests that G-CSF initiated < 24 h may benefit some patients.
METHODS: MONITOR-GCSF was a prospective, observational, multicenter, pan-European study of 1447 chemotherapy-treated patients receiving daily biosimilar (standard) filgrastim (Zarzio®/Zarxio®, filgrastim-sndz, Hexal AG, Sandoz Inc.). In this analysis, cycles were classified as same-day, per-guidelines, or late if G-CSF support was initiated < 24 h, 24-72 h, and > 72 h after chemotherapy. Outcomes included occurrence of CIN of any grade (CIN1/4), grade 3 or 4 (CIN3/4), grade 4 (CIN4), or FN: CIN/FN-related hospitalization or CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance.
RESULTS: A total of 5930 chemotherapy cycles from 1423 evaluable patients from MONITOR-GCSF had data for day of G-CSF initiation: 795 cycles (13.4%) classified as same-day, 3320 (56.0%) as per-guidelines, and 1815 (30.6%) as late. Groups did not differ as to CIN1/4 and FN episodes, or CIN/FN-related hospitalizations or chemotherapy disturbances. Patients in the same-day and per-guidelines groups had statistically similar odds of not experiencing any outcomes of interest in any given cycle. Patients in the late group had worse odds of experiencing CIN1/4, CIN3/4, and CIN4 episodes in any given cycle. Proportions of patients reporting clinical events of interest were generally similar.
CONCLUSIONS: This real-world evidence indicates that CIN/FN prophylaxis initiated with biosimilar filgrastim within 24-72 h post-chemotherapy is effective and safe. Filgrastim administration on the day of chemotherapy may be appropriate in some patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biosimilar; Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; Febrile neutropenia; Filgrastim; Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30343410     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4513-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  17 in total

1.  2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours.

Authors:  M S Aapro; J Bohlius; D A Cameron; Lissandra Dal Lago; J Peter Donnelly; N Kearney; G H Lyman; R Pettengell; V C Tjan-Heijnen; J Walewski; Damien C Weber; C Zielinski
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Same-day pegfilgrastim and chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jake Lokich
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  Update on the MONITOR-GCSF study of biosimilar filgrastim to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients: Protocol amendments.

Authors:  Pere Gascón; Matti Aapro; Heinz Ludwig; Nadia Rosencher; M Boccadoro; Matthew Turner; Karen MacDonald; Michael Muenzberg; Ivo Abraham
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.312

4.  Same day Pegfilgrastim and CHOP chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Jacob J Lokich
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.339

5.  Pegfilgrastim dosing on same day as myelosuppressive chemotherapy for ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer.

Authors:  Samer I Schuman; Nicholas Lambrou; Katie Robson; Stefan Glück; Nikolaos Myriounis; J Matt Pearson; Joseph A Lucci
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec

6.  Background and methodology of MONITOR-GCSF, a pharmaco-epidemiological study of the multi-level determinants, predictors, and clinical outcomes of febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with biosimilar granulocyte-colony stimulating factor filgrastim.

Authors:  Pere Gascón; Matti Aapro; Heinz Ludwig; Nadia Rosencher; Matthew Turner; MinKyoung Song; Karen MacDonald; Christopher Lee; Michael Muenzberg; Ivo Abraham
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 6.312

7.  Pegfilgrastim on the Same Day Versus Next Day of Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer, Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Results of Four Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Phase II Studies.

Authors:  Howard A Burris; Chandra P Belani; Peter A Kaufman; Alan N Gordon; Lee S Schwartzberg; Warren S Paroly; Seta Shahin; Lyndah Dreiling; Alan Saven
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Pegfilgrastim administered on the same day with dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer is associated with a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia as compared to conventional growth factor support: matched case-control study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  Dimosthenis V Skarlos; Eleni Timotheadou; Eleni Galani; Epaminondas Samantas; Irene Grimani; Evangelos Lianos; Gerasimos Aravantinos; Ioannis Xanthakis; George Pentheroudakis; Dimitrios Pectasides; George Fountzilas
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 2.935

9.  Rates of febrile neutropenia with pegfilgrastim on same day versus next day of CHOP with or without rituximab.

Authors:  Connie Cheng; Erika M Gallagher; Jun-Yen Yeh; Marc A Earl
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.248

10.  The safety and efficacy of day 1 versus day 2 administration of pegfilgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Jenny M Whitworth; Kellie S Matthews; Kimberly A Shipman; T Michael Numnum; James E Kendrick; Larry C Kilgore; J Michael Straughn
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of concomitant use of G-CSF and myelosuppressive chemotherapy on bone marrow and peripheral granulocytes in a mouse model.

Authors:  Yuki Endo; Takeshi Ishikawa; Kaname Oka; Tomoki Sakakida; Shinya Matsumura; Katsura Mizushima; Toshifumi Doi; Tetsuya Okayama; Kazuhiro Katada; Kazuhiro Kamada; Kazuhiko Uchiyama; Tomohisa Takagi; Hitoshi Fujiwara; Hideyuki Konishi; Yuji Naito; Yoshito Itoh
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Effects of Prophylactic Administration of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor on Peripheral Leukocyte and Neutrophil Counts Levels After Chemotherapy in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Wei Tian; Yali Wang; Yunxiang Zhou; Yihan Yao; Yongchuan Deng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 5.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.