Literature DB >> 19621966

Physical basis of metal-binding specificity in Escherichia coli NikR.

Christine M Phillips1, Paul S Nerenberg, Catherine L Drennan, Collin M Stultz.   

Abstract

In Escherichia coli and other bacteria, nickel uptake is regulated by the transcription factor NikR. Nickel binding at high-affinity sites in E. coli NikR (EcNikR) facilitates EcNikR binding to the nik operon, where it then suppresses transcription of genes encoding the nickel uptake transporter, NikABCDE. A structure of the EcNikR-DNA complex suggests that a second metal-binding site is also present when NikR binds to the nik operon. Moreover, this co-crystal structure raises the question of what metal occupies the second site under physiological conditions: K(+), which is present in the crystal structure, or Ni(2+), which has been proposed to bind to low- as well as high-affinity sites on EcNikR. To determine which ion is preferred at the second metal-binding site and the physical basis for any preference of one ion over another in both the second metal-binding site and the high-affinity sites, we conducted a series of detailed molecular simulations on the EcNikR structure. Simulations that place Ni(2+) at high-affinity sites lead to stable trajectories with realistic ion-ligand distances and geometries, while simulations that place K(+) at these sites lead to conformational changes in the protein that are likely unfavorable for ion binding. By contrast, simulations on the second metal site in the EcNikR-DNA complex lead to stable trajectories with realistic geometries regardless of whether K(+) or Ni(2+) occupies this site. Electrostatic binding free energy calculations, however, suggest that EcNikR binding to DNA is more favorable when the second metal-binding site contains K(+). An analysis of the energetic contributions to the electrostatic binding free energy suggests that, while the interaction between EcNikR and DNA is more favorable when the second site contains Ni(2+), the large desolvation penalty associated with moving Ni(2+) from solution to the relatively buried second site offsets this favorable interaction term. Additional free energy simulations that account for both electrostatic and non-electrostatic effects argue that EcNikR binding to DNA is most favorable when the second site contains a monovalent ion the size of K(+). Taken together, these data suggest that the EcNikR structure is most stable when Ni(2+) occupies high-affinity sites and that EcNikR binding to DNA is more favorable when the second site contains K(+).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19621966      PMCID: PMC3579654          DOI: 10.1021/ja9026314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  43 in total

1.  Dynamic ligand design and combinatorial optimization: designing inhibitors to endothiapepsin.

Authors:  C M Stultz; M Karplus
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-08-01

2.  Crystallization and preliminary crystallographic analysis of the nickel-responsive regulator NikR from Pyrococcus horikoshii.

Authors:  Tomoe Kitao; Chizu Kuroishi; Tahir H Tahirov
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun       Date:  2004-10-16

3.  Crystal structure of the nickel-responsive transcription factor NikR.

Authors:  Eric R Schreiter; Michael D Sintchak; Yayi Guo; Peter T Chivers; Robert T Sauer; Catherine L Drennan
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2003-09-14

Review 4.  Microbial nickel metalloregulation: NikRs for nickel ions.

Authors:  Nuvjeevan S Dosanjh; Sarah L J Michel
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 5.  Alternative respiratory pathways of Escherichia coli: energetics and transcriptional regulation in response to electron acceptors.

Authors:  G Unden; J Bongaerts
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1997-07-04

6.  Structure, dynamics and electrostatics of the active site of glutaredoxin 3 from Escherichia coli: comparison with functionally related proteins.

Authors:  N Foloppe; J Sagemark; K Nordstrand; K D Berndt; L Nilsson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-07-06       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Metal-ligand geometry relevant to proteins and in proteins: sodium and potassium.

Authors:  Marjorie M Harding
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2002-04-26

8.  Coordination geometries of selected transition metal ions (Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, and Hg2+) in metalloproteins.

Authors:  L Rulísek; J Vondrásek
Journal:  J Inorg Biochem       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.155

9.  Computational and experimental probes of symmetry mismatches in the Arc repressor-DNA complex.

Authors:  Shari Spector; Robert T Sauer; Bruce Tidor
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-07-02       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 10.  Nickel uptake and utilization by microorganisms.

Authors:  Scott B Mulrooney; Robert P Hausinger
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 16.408

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Metal site occupancy and allosteric switching in bacterial metal sensor proteins.

Authors:  Alfredo J Guerra; David P Giedroc
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 4.013

2.  Structural basis of low-affinity nickel binding to the nickel-responsive transcription factor NikR from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Christine M Phillips; Eric R Schreiter; Collin M Stultz; Catherine L Drennan
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Apo and nickel-bound forms of the Pyrococcus horikoshii species of the metalloregulatory protein: NikR characterized by molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Daniel J Sindhikara; Adrian E Roitberg; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Molecular Mechanism for Attractant Signaling to DHMA by E. coli Tsr.

Authors:  Asuka A Orr; Jingyun Yang; Nitesh Sule; Ravi Chawla; Kenneth G Hull; Mingzhao Zhu; Daniel Romo; Pushkar P Lele; Arul Jayaraman; Michael D Manson; Phanourios Tamamis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Searching for the Nik operon: how a ligand-responsive transcription factor hunts for its DNA binding site.

Authors:  Christine M Phillips; Collin M Stultz; Catherine L Drennan
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Structural and mechanistic insights into Helicobacter pylori NikR activation.

Authors:  C Bahlawane; C Dian; C Muller; A Round; C Fauquant; K Schauer; H de Reuse; L Terradot; I Michaud-Soret
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 16.971

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.