OBJECTIVES: The Weight Loss Maintenance Trial (WLM) was a multicenter, randomized trial comparing two weight loss maintenance interventions, a personal contact (PC) program with primarily telephone-based monthly contacts, and an Internet-based program (interactive technology, IT), to a self-directed control group, among overweight or obese individuals at high cardiovascular risk. This study describes implementation costs of both interventions as well as IT development costs. METHODS: Resources were micro-costed in 2006 dollars from the primary perspective of a sponsoring healthcare system considering adopting an extant intervention, rather than developing its own. Costs were discounted at 3 percent annually. Length of trial participation was 30 months (randomization during February-November 2004). IT development costs were assessed over 36 months. Univariate and multivariate, including probabilistic, sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS:Total discounted IT development costs over 36 months were $839,949 ($2,414 per IT participant). Discounted 30-month implementation costs for 342 PC participants were $537,242 ($1,571 per participant), and for 348 IT participants, were $214,879 ($617 per participant). Under all plausible scenarios, PC implementation costs exceeded IT implementation costs. CONCLUSIONS:Costs of implementing and operating an Internet-based intervention for weight loss maintenance were substantially less than analogous costs of an intervention using standard phone and in-person contacts and are of a magnitude that would be attractive to many health systems, subject to demonstration of cost-effectiveness.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The Weight Loss Maintenance Trial (WLM) was a multicenter, randomized trial comparing two weight loss maintenance interventions, a personal contact (PC) program with primarily telephone-based monthly contacts, and an Internet-based program (interactive technology, IT), to a self-directed control group, among overweight or obese individuals at high cardiovascular risk. This study describes implementation costs of both interventions as well as IT development costs. METHODS: Resources were micro-costed in 2006 dollars from the primary perspective of a sponsoring healthcare system considering adopting an extant intervention, rather than developing its own. Costs were discounted at 3 percent annually. Length of trial participation was 30 months (randomization during February-November 2004). IT development costs were assessed over 36 months. Univariate and multivariate, including probabilistic, sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Total discounted IT development costs over 36 months were $839,949 ($2,414 per IT participant). Discounted 30-month implementation costs for 342 PCparticipants were $537,242 ($1,571 per participant), and for 348 IT participants, were $214,879 ($617 per participant). Under all plausible scenarios, PC implementation costs exceeded IT implementation costs. CONCLUSIONS: Costs of implementing and operating an Internet-based intervention for weight loss maintenance were substantially less than analogous costs of an intervention using standard phone and in-person contacts and are of a magnitude that would be attractive to many health systems, subject to demonstration of cost-effectiveness.
Authors: R W Jeffery; A Drewnowski; L H Epstein; A J Stunkard; G T Wilson; R R Wing; D R Hill Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Lawrence J Appel; Catherine M Champagne; David W Harsha; Lawton S Cooper; Eva Obarzanek; Patricia J Elmer; Victor J Stevens; William M Vollmer; Pao-Hwa Lin; Laura P Svetkey; Sarah W Stedman; Deborah R Young Journal: JAMA Date: 2003 Apr 23-30 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Margaret A McDowell; Carolyn J Tabak; Katherine M Flegal Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-04-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Russell E Glasgow; Candace C Nelson; Kathleen A Kearney; Robert Reid; Debra P Ritzwoller; Victor J Strecher; Mick P Couper; Beverly Green; Kevin Wildenhaus Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2007-05-09 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Elizabeth Anne Bennett; Rachel Pearl Kolko; Lichun Chia; Jennifer Padden Elliott; Melissa Ann Kalarchian Journal: West J Nurs Res Date: 2017-03-28 Impact factor: 1.967
Authors: Richard T Meenan; Scott P Stumbo; Micah T Yarborough; Michael C Leo; Bobbi Jo H Yarborough; Carla A Green Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2016-07
Authors: L Susan Wieland; Louise Falzon; Chris N Sciamanna; Kimberlee J Trudeau; Suzanne Brodney; Joseph E Schwartz; Karina W Davidson Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2012-08-15
Authors: Kristine L Funk; Victor J Stevens; Lawrence J Appel; Alan Bauck; Phillip J Brantley; Catherine M Champagne; Janelle Coughlin; Arlene T Dalcin; Jean Harvey-Berino; Jack F Hollis; Gerald J Jerome; Betty M Kennedy; Lillian F Lien; Valerie H Myers; Carmen Samuel-Hodge; Laura P Svetkey; William M Vollmer Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2010-07-27 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Saskia M Kelders; Robin N Kok; Hans C Ossebaard; Julia E W C Van Gemert-Pijnen Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 5.428