Deborah F Tate1, Elizabeth H Jackvony, Rena R Wing. 1. Brown University School of Medicine/Miriam Hospital, Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center, Providence, RI 02906, USA. dtate@lifespan.org
Abstract
CONTEXT: Weight loss programs on the Internet appear promising for short-term weight loss but have not been studied for weight loss in individuals at risk of type 2 diabetes; thus, the longer-term efficacy is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of an Internet weight loss program alone vs with the addition of behavioral counseling via e-mail provided for 1 year to individuals at risk of type 2 diabetes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A single-center randomized controlled trial conducted from September 2001 to September 2002 in Providence, RI, of 92 overweight adultswhose mean (SD) age was 48.5 (9.4) years and body mass index, 33.1 (3.8). INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to a basic Internet (n = 46) or to an Internet plus behavioral e-counseling program (n = 46). Both groups received 1 face-to-face counseling session and the same core Internet programs and were instructed to submit weekly weights. Participants in e-counseling submitted calorie and exercise information and received weekly e-mail behavioral counseling and feedback from a counselor. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measured weight and waist circumference at 0 and 12 months. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analyses showed the behavioral e-counseling group lost more mean (SD) weight at 12 months than the basic Internet group (-4.4 [6.2] vs -2.0 [5.7] kg; P =.04), and had greater decreases in percentage of initial body weight (4.8% vs 2.2%; P =.03), body mass index (-1.6 [2.2] vs -0.8 [2.1]; P =.03), and waist circumference (-7.2 [7.5] vs -4.4 [5.7] cm; P =.05). CONCLUSION: Adding e-mail counseling to a basic Internet weight loss intervention program significantly improved weight loss in adults at risk of diabetes.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Weight loss programs on the Internet appear promising for short-term weight loss but have not been studied for weight loss in individuals at risk of type 2 diabetes; thus, the longer-term efficacy is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of an Internet weight loss program alone vs with the addition of behavioral counseling via e-mail provided for 1 year to individuals at risk of type 2 diabetes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A single-center randomized controlled trial conducted from September 2001 to September 2002 in Providence, RI, of 92 overweight adults whose mean (SD) age was 48.5 (9.4) years and body mass index, 33.1 (3.8). INTERVENTIONS:Participants were randomized to a basic Internet (n = 46) or to an Internet plus behavioral e-counseling program (n = 46). Both groups received 1 face-to-face counseling session and the same core Internet programs and were instructed to submit weekly weights. Participants in e-counseling submitted calorie and exercise information and received weekly e-mail behavioral counseling and feedback from a counselor. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measured weight and waist circumference at 0 and 12 months. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analyses showed the behavioral e-counseling group lost more mean (SD) weight at 12 months than the basic Internet group (-4.4 [6.2] vs -2.0 [5.7] kg; P =.04), and had greater decreases in percentage of initial body weight (4.8% vs 2.2%; P =.03), body mass index (-1.6 [2.2] vs -0.8 [2.1]; P =.03), and waist circumference (-7.2 [7.5] vs -4.4 [5.7] cm; P =.05). CONCLUSION: Adding e-mail counseling to a basic Internet weight loss intervention program significantly improved weight loss in adults at risk of diabetes.
Authors: Kate Lambourne; Richard A Washburn; Cheryl Gibson; Debra K Sullivan; Jeannine Goetz; Robert Lee; Bryan K Smith; Matthew S Mayo; Joseph E Donnelly Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2012-06-01 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Lisa B Hightow-Weidman; Emily Pike; Beth Fowler; Derrick M Matthews; Jessica Kibe; Regina McCoy; Adaora A Adimora Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2012-01-24
Authors: Rebecca A Krukowski; Jean Harvey-Berino; Takamaru Ashikaga; Colleen S Thomas; Nicci Micco Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Bonnie Spring; Jennifer M Duncan; E Amy Janke; Andrea T Kozak; H Gene McFadden; Andrew DeMott; Alex Pictor; Leonard H Epstein; Juned Siddique; Christine A Pellegrini; Joanna Buscemi; Donald Hedeker Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-01-28 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Gwen L Alexander; Jennifer B McClure; Josephine H Calvi; George W Divine; Melanie A Stopponi; Sharon J Rolnick; Jerianne Heimendinger; Dennis D Tolsma; Kenneth Resnicow; Marci K Campbell; Victor J Strecher; Christine Cole Johnson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 9.308