Literature DB >> 19616436

Kinematics and kinetics with an adaptive ankle foot system during stair ambulation of transtibial amputees.

Merkur Alimusaj1, Laetitia Fradet, Frank Braatz, Hans J Gerner, Sebastian I Wolf.   

Abstract

Conventional prosthetic feet cannot adapt to specific conditions such as walking on stairs or ramps. Amputees are therefore forced to compensate their prosthetic deficits by modifying the kinematics and kinetics of their lower limbs. The Proprio-Foot (Ossur) intends to reduce these compensation mechanisms by automatically increasing dorsiflexion during stair ambulation thanks to an adaptive microprocessor-controlled ankle. The present investigation proposes to analyze the biomechanical effects of the dorsiflexion adaptation in transtibial (TT) amputees during stair ambulation. Sixteen TT amputees and sixteen healthy controls underwent conventional 3D gait analysis. Kinematics and kinetics of the lower limbs were compared during stair ascent and descent performed by patients with the prosthetic foot set to a neutral ankle angle and with an adapted dorsiflexion ankle angle of 4 degrees . Norm distance as well as minimum and maximal values of sagittal kinematics and kinetics were calculated for comparisons between patients and control subjects. For both stair ascent and descent, an improvement of the knee kinematics and kinetics could particularly be noticed on the involved side with an increase of the knee flexion and an increase of the knee moment during stance. Therefore, despite its additional weight compared to a conventional prosthetic ankle, the Proprio-Foot should be beneficial to active TT amputees whose knee musculature strength does not constitute a handicap.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19616436     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  15 in total

1.  Trunk kinetic effort during step ascent and descent in patients with transtibial amputation using angular momentum separation.

Authors:  Brecca M M Gaffney; Cory L Christiansen; Amanda M Murray; Bradley S Davidson
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  A Compact, Lightweight Robotic Ankle-Foot Prosthesis: Featuring a Powered Polycentric Design.

Authors:  Lukas Gabert; Sarah Hood; Minh Tran; Marco Cempini; Tommaso Lenzi
Journal:  IEEE Robot Autom Mag       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 5.143

3.  Energetic consequences of using a prosthesis with adaptive ankle motion during slope walking in persons with a transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Benjamin J Darter; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Biomechanical compensations of the trunk and lower extremities during stepping tasks after unilateral transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Amanda M Murray; Brecca M Gaffney; Bradley S Davidson; Cory L Christiansen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Design and Validation of a Semi-Active Variable Stiffness Foot Prosthesis.

Authors:  Evan M Glanzer; Peter G Adamczyk
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Movement asymmetry during low and high demand mobility tasks after dysvascular transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Jesse C Christensen; Paul W Kline; Amanda M Murray; Cory L Christiansen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Patients' Satisfaction with Lower-limb Prosthetic and Orthotic Devices and Service delivery in Sierra Leone and Malawi.

Authors:  Lina Magnusson; Gerd Ahlström
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Electroencephalogram-Based Brain-Computer Interface and Lower-Limb Prosthesis Control: A Case Study.

Authors:  Douglas P Murphy; Ou Bai; Ashraf S Gorgey; John Fox; William T Lovegreen; Brian W Burkhardt; Roozbeh Atri; Juan S Marquez; Qi Li; Ding-Yu Fei
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Subject-specific responses to an adaptive ankle prosthesis during incline walking.

Authors:  Erik P Lamers; Maura E Eveld; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Effects of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis on kinetic loading of the unaffected leg during level-ground walking.

Authors:  Alena M Grabowski; Susan D'Andrea
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.