Literature DB >> 19610306

Commissioning a passive-scattering proton therapy nozzle for accurate SOBP delivery.

M Engelsman1, H M Lu, D Herrup, M Bussiere, H M Kooy.   

Abstract

Proton radiotherapy centers that currently use passively scattered proton beams do field specific calibrations for a non-negligible fraction of treatment fields, which is time and resource consuming. Our improved understanding of the passive scattering mode of the IBA universal nozzle, especially of the current modulation function, allowed us to re-commission our treatment control system for accurate delivery of SOBPs of any range and modulation, and to predict the output for each of these fields. We moved away from individual field calibrations to a state where continued quality assurance of SOBP field delivery is ensured by limited system-wide measurements that only require one hour per week. This manuscript reports on a protocol for generation of desired SOBPs and prediction of dose output.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19610306      PMCID: PMC2832065          DOI: 10.1118/1.3121489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  12 in total

1.  AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.

Authors:  P R Almond; P J Biggs; B M Coursey; W F Hanson; M S Huq; R Nath; D W Rogers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Monitor unit calculations for range-modulated spread-out Bragg peak fields.

Authors:  Hanne M Kooy; Matthew Schaefer; Skip Rosenthal; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-09-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Accurate Monte Carlo simulations for nozzle design, commissioning and quality assurance for a proton radiation therapy facility.

Authors:  H Paganetti; H Jiang; S Y Lee; H M Kooy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The prediction of output factors for spread-out proton Bragg peak fields in clinical practice.

Authors:  Hanne M Kooy; Stanley J Rosenthal; Martijn Engelsman; Alejandro Mazal; Roelf L Slopsema; Harald Paganetti; Jacob B Flanz
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Determination of output factors for small proton therapy fields.

Authors:  Jonas D Fontenot; Wayne D Newhauser; Charles Bloch; R Allen White; Uwe Titt; George Starkschall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Sensitivities in the production of spread-out Bragg peak dose distributions by passive scattering with beam current modulation.

Authors:  Hsiao-Ming Lu; Robert Brett; Martijn Engelsman; Roelf Slopsema; Hanne Kooy; Jay Flanz
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Monte Carlo investigation of collimator scatter of proton-therapy beams produced using the passive scattering method.

Authors:  Uwe Titt; Yuanshui Zheng; Oleg N Vassiliev; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Comparison between the lateral penumbra of a collimated double-scattered beam and uncollimated scanning beam in proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sairos Safai; Thomas Bortfeld; Martijn Engelsman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Field size dependence of the output factor in passively scattered proton therapy: influence of range, modulation, air gap, and machine settings.

Authors:  J Daartz; M Engelsman; Harald Paganetti; M R Bussière
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  An analytical approximation of depth-dose distributions for therapeutic proton beams.

Authors:  T Bortfeld; W Schlegel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  8 in total

1.  Dosimetric accuracy of planning and delivering small proton therapy fields.

Authors:  Bryan Bednarz; Juliane Daartz; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Golden beam data for proton pencil-beam scanning.

Authors:  Benjamin Clasie; Nicolas Depauw; Maurice Fransen; Carles Gomà; Hamid Reza Panahandeh; Joao Seco; Jacob B Flanz; Hanne M Kooy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Uncertainties and correction methods when modeling passive scattering proton therapy treatment heads with Monte Carlo.

Authors:  Bryan Bednarz; Hsiao-Ming Lu; Martijn Engelsman; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Recommendations for the referral of patients for proton-beam therapy, an Alberta Health Services report: a model for Canada?

Authors:  S Patel; X Kostaras; M Parliament; I A Olivotto; R Nordal; K Aronyk; N Hagen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 5.  Proton therapy in clinical practice.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Joe Y Chang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2011-05

6.  Implementation of an improved dose-per-MU model for double-scattered proton beams to address interbeamline modulation width variability.

Authors:  Liyong Lin; JiaJian Shen; Christopher G Ainsley; Timothy D Solberg; James E McDonough
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Development of Optical Fiber Based Measurement System for the Verification of Entrance Dose Map in Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Beam.

Authors:  Jaeman Son; Se Byeong Lee; Youngkyung Lim; Sung Yong Park; Kwanho Cho; Myonggeun Yoon; Dongho Shin
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 8.  Advances in proton therapy in lung cancer.

Authors:  Melissa A L Vyfhuis; Nasarachi Onyeuku; Tejan Diwanji; Sina Mossahebi; Neha P Amin; Shahed N Badiyan; Pranshu Mohindra; Charles B Simone
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.