Literature DB >> 19609930

The GD box: a widespread noncontiguous supersecondary structural element.

Vikram Alva1, Stanislaw Dunin-Horkawicz, Michael Habeck, Murray Coles, Andrei N Lupas.   

Abstract

Identification and characterization of recurrent supersecondary structural elements is central to understanding the rules governing protein tertiary structure. Here, we describe the GD box, a widespread noncontiguous supersecondary element, which we initially found in a group of topologically distinct but homologous beta-barrels--the cradle-loop barrels. The GD box is similar both in sequence and structure and comprises two short unpaired beta-strands connected by an orthogonal type-II beta-turn and a noncontiguous beta-strand forming hydrogen bonds with the beta-turn. Using structure-based analysis, we have detected 518 instances of the GD box in a nonredundant subset of the SCOP database comprising 3771 domains. Apart from the cradle-loop barrels, this motif is also found in a diverse set of nonhomologous folds including other topologically related beta-barrels. Since nonlocal interactions are fundamental in the formation of protein structure, systematic identification and characterization of other noncontiguous supersecondary structural elements is likely to prove valuable to protein structure modeling, validation, and prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19609930      PMCID: PMC2777370          DOI: 10.1002/pro.207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  22 in total

1.  Correlation of observed fold frequency with the occurrence of local structural motifs.

Authors:  G M Salem; E G Hutchinson; C A Orengo; J M Thornton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-04-16       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  On the evolution of protein folds: are similar motifs in different protein folds the result of convergence, insertion, or relics of an ancient peptide world?

Authors:  A N Lupas; C P Ponting; R B Russell
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.867

3.  HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information.

Authors:  Cyril Dominguez; Rolf Boelens; Alexandre M J J Bonvin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Prediction of local structure in proteins using a library of sequence-structure motifs.

Authors:  C Bystroff; D Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-08-21       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  PROMOTIF--a program to identify and analyze structural motifs in proteins.

Authors:  E G Hutchinson; J M Thornton
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  A procedure for determining rigid body transformation parameters.

Authors:  J H Challis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  A revised set of potentials for beta-turn formation in proteins.

Authors:  E G Hutchinson; J M Thornton
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins.

Authors:  I K McDonald; J M Thornton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-05-20       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Context-dependent secondary structure formation of a designed protein sequence.

Authors:  D L Minor; P S Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-04-25       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Calculation of protein structures with ambiguous distance restraints. Automated assignment of ambiguous NOE crosspeaks and disulphide connectivities.

Authors:  M Nilges
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-02-03       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  5 in total

1.  Delineation of structural domains and identification of functionally important residues in DNA repair enzyme exonuclease VII.

Authors:  Katarzyna Poleszak; Katarzyna H Kaminska; Stanislaw Dunin-Horkawicz; Andrei Lupas; Krzysztof J Skowronek; Janusz M Bujnicki
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  ECOD: an evolutionary classification of protein domains.

Authors:  Hua Cheng; R Dustin Schaeffer; Yuxing Liao; Lisa N Kinch; Jimin Pei; Shuoyong Shi; Bong-Hyun Kim; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  The Urfold: Structural similarity just above the superfold level?

Authors:  Cameron Mura; Stella Veretnik; Philip E Bourne
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Confidence-guided local structure prediction with HHfrag.

Authors:  Ivan Kalev; Michael Habeck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Fold Evolution before LUCA: Common Ancestry of SH3 Domains and OB Domains.

Authors:  Claudia Alvarez-Carreño; Petar I Penev; Anton S Petrov; Loren Dean Williams
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 16.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.